The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry

Scientometrics

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 535-553

  Kato, Maki ^a   Ando, Asao ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Chemistry; International co authorship; Research collaboration; Research performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887994728     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1011-y     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011a). Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones? Scientometrics, 88(3), 915-928.
2. Abramo, G., D'angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011b). The relationship between scientists' research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629-643.
3. Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaboration: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34(3), 259-285.
4. Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377.
5. Bell, R. K., Hill, D., & Lehming, R. F. (2007). The changing research and publication environment in American research universities. NSF working paper. SRS 07-204. Retrieved September, 13 2010, from http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/srs07204/pdf/srs07204. pdf.
6. BIS. (2011). International comparative performance of the UK research base 2011. Retrieved August, 28 2012 from http://www. bis. gov. uk/assets/biscore/science/docs/i/11-p123-international-comparative-performance-uk-research-base-2011.
7. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. A. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.
8. Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7), 716-740.
9. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
10. Carayol, N., & Matt, M. (2006). Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists' productivity. Information Economics and Policy, 18(1), 55-72.
11. Choi, S. (2012). Core-periphery, new clusters, or rising stars?: International scientific collaboration among 'advanced' countries in the era of globalization. Scientometrics, 90(1), 25-41.
12. David, P. A. (1994). Positive feedbacks and research productivity in science: reopening another black box. In O. Grandstrand (Ed.), Economics of technology (pp. 65-89). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293-305.
14. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349-367.
15. Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 187-203.
16. Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M., Sooryamoorthy, R., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D. S., & Shrum, W. (2005). Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 755-785.
17. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
18. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.
19. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European union (1985-1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185-202.
20. Huang, M. H., Tang, M. C., & Chen, D. Z. (2011). Inequality of publishing performance and international collaboration in physics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1156-1165.
21. Kato, M. (2011). Analysis on career paths of the most highly cited scientists in Japan through international comparison. Discussion paper no. 78. NISTEP.
22. Kato, M., & Chayama, H. (2010). Analysis on research activities in developing countries and international networking of researchers. Research material 178. NISTEP.
23. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
24. Kretschmer, H. (1994). Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30(1), 363-369.
25. Laudel, G. (2002). Collaboration and reward: What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3-15.
26. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.
27. Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 114-132.
28. Muraoka, T., Nishina, K., Fukao, Y., Chinami, K., & Otani, S. (2003). The choice of language for international graduate students in scientific fields. Journal of Technical Japanese Education, 5, 55-60.
29. Nagpaul, P. S. (2003). Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 56(3), 403-416.
30. NISTEP. (2011). Japanese science and technology indicators 2011. Research material No. 198. NISTEP.
31. Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. (2008). International research collaboration, research team performance, and scientific and technological capabilities in Colombia-A bottom-up perspective. Paper presented in the IV Globelics Conference at Mexico City, September 22-24.
32. Regets, M. C. (2007). Research issues in the international migration of highly skilled workers: A perspective with data from the United States. NSF Working paper SRS 07-203. Retrieved 28, August 2012, from http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/srs07203/.
33. Sandström, U. (2009). Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: mobility, gender and research performance. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 135-142.
34. Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publication an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361-377.
35. Stephan, P. E. (2008). Job market effects on scientific productivity. Retrieved 28, August 2012, from http://www. cso. edu/upload/PDF_rencontres/SEM_ES_Paula-Stephan. pdf.
36. Ubfal, D., & Maffioli, A. (2011). The impact of funding on research collaboration: Evidence from developing country. Research Policy, 40(9), 1269-1279.
37. van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring science: capita selecta of current main issues. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies on S&T systems (pp. 19-50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38. Vinkler, P. (2011). Application of the distribution of citations among publications in scientometric evaluations. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1963-1978.
39. Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
40. Wuchty, S., Benjamin, J. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039.
41. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627-657.