Integrated information visualization to support decision making for use of antibiotics in intensive care: Design and usability evaluation

Informatics for Health and Social Care

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 330-353

  Forsman, Johanna ^a   Anani, Nadim ^a   Eghdam, Aboozar ^a   Falkenhav, Magnus ^a,b   Koch, Sabine ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bacterial infections; Decision making; Eye tracking; Information visualization; Usability evaluation

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL INFECTION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MEDICAL STAFF; PILOT STUDY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SWEDEN; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; DATA DISPLAY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SWEDEN; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84887880742     PISSN: 17538157     EISSN: 17538165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2013.812649     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Fish D, Ohlinger M. Antimicrobial resistance: factors and outcomes. Crit Care Clin 2006;22:291-311
2. Giske C, Monnet D, Cars O, Carmeli Y. Clinical and economic impact of common multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52: 813-21
3. Cars O. Meeting the challenge of antibiotic resistance. BMJ 2008;337:726-8
4. Sintchenko V, Coiera E, Gilbert G. Decision support systems for antibiotic prescribing. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2008;21:573-9
5. Sintchenko V, Iredell J, Gilbert G, Coiera E. What do physicians think about evidence-based antibiotic use in critical care? A survey of Australian intensivists and infectious disease practitioners. Int Med J 2001;31:462-9
6. Harbarth S, Samore M. Antimicrobial resistance determinants and future control. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11:794-801
7. Clemmer TP. Computers in the ICU: where we started and where we are now. J Crit Care 2004;19:201-7
8. Elson RB, Faughnan JG, Connelly DP. An industrial process view of information delivery to support clinical decision making: implications for systems design and process measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:266-78
9. Thursky K. Use of computerized decision support systems to improve antibiotic prescribing. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2006;4:491-507
10. Sittig D, Wright A, Osheroff J, et al. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inf 2008;41:387-92
11. Patel V, Kushniruk A. Interface design for health care environments: the role of cognitive science. Proc AMIA Symp 1998:29-37
12. Maurer D. What is usability? 2004 [cited 2012 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.steptwo.com.au/files/kmc-whatisusability.pdf.
13. Bundschuh BB, Majeed RW, Bu rkle T, et al. Quality of human-computer interaction - results of a national usability survey of hospital-IT in Germany. BMC Med Inform Decis 2011;11:1-12
14. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Guappone KP, et al. Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis 2012;12:1-19
15. Ozel D, Bilge U, Zayim N, Cengiz M. A web-based intensive care clinical decision support system: from design to evaluation. Inform Health Soc Care 2012;38:79-92
16. Wright P, Jansen C, Wyatt JC. How to limit clinical errors in interpretation of data. Lancet 1998;352:1539-43
17. Horn W. AI in medicine on its way from knowledge-intensive to data-intensive systems. Artif Intell Med 2001;23:5-12
18. Khajouei R, Jaspers MWM. The impact of CPOE medication systems design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders. Methods Inf Med [Review article] 2010;49:3-19
19. openEHR. [cited 2011 Jul 05]. Available from: www.openEHR.org .
20. Patton MQ. Fieldwork strategies and observation methods. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2002
21. Malterud K. Analys av kvalitativa data. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning. 1:7 ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1998
22. Graneheim U, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurs Educ Today 2004;24:105-12
23. JFreeChart [cited 2011 Jul 05]; Available from: http://www.jfree.org/ jfreechart/
24. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals, Part 11: guidance on usability. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization; 1998
25. Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. JUS 2009;4:114-23
26. Anani N, Chen R, Koch S. Exchanging data via openEHR for patient-specific overviews in intensive care: a case study. Short communication at MIE2011 - 23rd International Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics; 2011 August 28-31; Oslo, Norway.
27. Eghdam A, Forsman J, Falkenhav M, et al. Combining usability testing with eyetracking technology: evaluation of a visualization support for antibiotic use in intensive care. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;169:945-9
28. Bevan N. Measuring usability as quality of use. Software Qual J 1995;4:115-30
29. Sauro J. Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS). 2011 February 2 [2012 Mar 14]. Available from: http://www.measuringusability.com/sus. php.
30. Green C, Gilhooly K, Logie R, Ross D. Human factors and computerisation in intensive care units: a review. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1991;8:167-78
31. Elson RB, Connelly DP. The impact of anticipatory patient data displays on physician decision making: a pilot study. AMIA 1997:233-7
32. Zhang Y, Drews FA, Westenskow DR, et al. Effects of integrated graphical displays on situation awareness in anaesthesiology. Cogn Tech Work 2002;4:82-90
33. Bade R, Schlechtweg S, Miksch S, eds. Connecting time-oriented data and information to a coherent interactive visualization. In: Proceedings of CHI 04, ACM Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vienna, Austria: ACM Press; 2004
34. Miller A, Scheinkestel C, Steele C. The effects of clinical information presentation on physicians and nurses decision-making in ICUs. Appl Ergon 2009;40:753-61
35. Koch S, Staggers N, Weir C, et al., eds. Integrated information displays for ICU nurses: field observations, display design, and display evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Vol. 54. San Francisco (CA): Sage; 2010:932-6
36. Steurbaut K, Colpaert K, Gadeyne B, et al. COSARA: integrated service platform for infection survelliance and antibiotic management in the ICU. J Med Syst 2012;36:3765-75
37. Chittaro L. Information visualization and its application to medicine. Artif Intell Med 2001;22:81-8
38. Law AS, Freer Y, Hunter J, et al. A comparison of graphical and textual presentations of time series data to support medical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Monit Comput 2005;19:183-94
39. Speier C. The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance. Int J Hum-Comput St 2006;64:1115-31
40. Workman M, Lesser MF, Kim J. An exploratory study of cognitive load in diagnosing patient conditions. Int J Qual Health C 2007;19:127-33
41. Hawley ST, Zikmund-Fisher B, Ubel P, et al. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:448-55
42. Bauer DT, Guerlain S, Brown PJ. The design and evaluation of a graphical display for laboratory data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:416-24
43. Kawamoto K, Houlihan C, Balas E, Lobach D. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765
44. Bruins MJ, Ruijs GJ, Wolfhagen MJ, et al. Does electronic clinical microbiology results reporting influence medical decision making: a pre- and post-interview study of medical specialists. BMC Med Inform Decis 2011;11:1-7
45. Virzi RA. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum Factors 1992;34:457-68
46. Nielsen J. Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test. Int J Hum-Comput St 1994;41:385-97.