Determination of expander apparatus displacements and contact pressures on the mucosa using FEM modelling considering mandibular asymmetries

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 954-962

  Braga, Iracema Utsch ^a   Rocha, Daniel Neves ^a   Utsch, Ricardo Luiz ^a   Las Casas, Estevam Barbosa ^a   Andrade, Roberto Márcio ^a   Jorge, Renato Natal ^b   Braga, Rafael Utsch ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c Universidade do Porto ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

contact pressure; expander apparatus; finite element method; malocclusion; mandibular asymmetry

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL MODELLING; CONSTRUCTIVE SOLID GEOMETRY; CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; CONTACT PRESSURES; EXPANDER APPARATUS; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBULAR ASYMMETRY; PIEZOELECTRIC SENSORS;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; DENTISTRY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; ITERATIVE METHODS; PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; SCREWS; TOMOGRAPHY;

EQUIPMENT;

ALGORITHM; ANATOMICAL CONCEPTS; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTACT PRESSURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; JOINT DISLOCATION; MALOCCLUSION; MEASUREMENT; MUCOSA; PREDICTION; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STRETCHING; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; THICKNESS;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MOUTH MUCOSA; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; PRESSURE; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84887874548     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.645227     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. BindoMJF, NakamaeAEM, SantosLB, IshikawaKH, GuarnieriTC, TamakiR. 2009. Study of the surface hardness and modulus of elasticity of conventional and microwave-cured acrylic resins. Braz Oral Res. 23(1):68-75.
2. BorchersL, ReichartP. 1983. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res.62:155-159.
3. BoryorAN, GeigerM, HohmannA, WunderlichA, SanderC, SanderMF, SanderGF. 2008. Stress distribution and displacement analysis during an intermaxillary disjunction - a three-dimensional FEM study of a human skull. J Biomech. 41:376-382.
4. BoryorAN, HohmannaA, WunderlichA, GeigerM, KilicF, SanderM, SanderC, BöckersT, GünterFS. 2010. In-vitro results of rapid maxillary expansion on adults compared with finite element simulations. J Biomech. 43:1237-1242.
5. BragaIMU, RochaDN, FilgueirasP, Las CasasEB, AndradeRM, JorgeRN, MartinsPALS. 2009. Biomechanical study of changes in buccal bone structure induced by expansion screw. In: Biodental engineering. Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema. p. 17-21.
6. CattaneoPM, DalstraM, MelsenB. 2005. The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res. 84(5):428-433.
7. CookSD, WeinsteinAM, KlawitterJJ. 1982. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implant. J Dent Res. 61:25-29.
8. CozzaP, BaccettiT, FranchiL, ToffolL, McNamaraJA. 2006. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Classe II malocclusions: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 129(5):599.el-599.e12.
9. EmrichRE, BrodieAG, BlayneyJR. 1965. Prevalence of Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusions (angle) in a urban population. An epidemiological study. J Dent Res. 44(5):947-953.
10. GengJP, TanKBC, LiuGR. 2001. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of literature. J Prosthet Dent. 85(6):585-598.
11. HaasAJ. 1970. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of the dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod. 57(3):219-255.
12. HamulaW. 1993. Modified mandibular Schwarz appliance. J Clin Orthod. 27:89-93.
13. HartRT, HemebelVV, ThongpredaN, BuskirkWC, AndersonRC. 2006. Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Biomech. 25:261-286.
14. HousleyJA, NandaRS, CurrierGF, McCuneDE. 2003. Stability of transverse expansion in the mandibular arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 124:184-188.
15. KatadaH, KatadaA, YasushigeI. 2005. Changes in orthodontic cephalometric reference points on application of orthopedic force to jaw: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 46(3):59-65.
16. KawasakiK, TakayamaT, YamadaEK, NotamiE. 2001. Relationship between the stress distribution and the shape of the alveolar residual ridge-three-dimensional behavior of a lower complete denture. J Rehabil. 28:950-957.
17. McNamaraJA, BrudonWL. 1993. Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in mixed dentition. Ann Arbor, MI: Needham Press. p. 171-178.
18. MiddletonJ, JonesM, WilsonA. 1996. The role of the periodontal ligament in bone modeling the initial development of a time-dependent finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 109:155-162.
19. Miguel NetoAB, NishioC, MuchaJN. 2010. Agreement evaluation of a newly proposed system for malocclusion classification. Int J Odontostomat. 4(1):33-41.
20. MotoyoshiM, HirabayashiM, ShimazakiT. 2002. An experimental study on mandibular expansion: increases in arch width and perimeter. Eur J Orthod. 24(2):125-130.
21. MotoyoshiM, ShiraiS, YanoS, NakanishiS. 2005. Permissible limits for mandibular expansion. Eur J Orthod. 27(2):115-120.
22. NordinM, FrankelVH. 1989. Biomechanics of bone (Chap. 1). In: NordinM, FrankelVH, editors. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger. p. 323-325.
23. OgiharaK, NakaharaR, KoyanagiS, SudaM. 1998. Treatment of a Brodie bite by lower lateral expansion: a case report and fourth year follow-up. J Clin Pediat Dent. 23:17-21.
24. OréficeRL, PereiraMM, MansurHS. 2005. Biomateriais: Fundamentos e Aplicações. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Cultura Médica. p. 538.
25. ÖzkayaN, NordinM. 1999. Fundamentals of biomechanics: equilibrium, motion, and deformation. 2nd ed.New York: Springer Verlag. p. 393-395.
26. PerilloL, CanavaleR, FerroF, MasucciC, ChiodinniP, BaccettiT. 2010. Meta analisys of skeletal mandibular changes during Frankell appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2:115-120.
27. PhillipsRW. 1993. Materiais Dentários de Skinner. 9th ed.Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan. p. 123-124.
28. ReitanK. 1960. Tissue behavior during orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 46:881-900.
29. SandyJR, FardaleRW, MeikleMC. 1993. Recent advances in understanding mechanically induced bone remodeling and their relevance to orthodontic theory and practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 103(3):212-222.
30. SchwarzAM. 1932. Tissue changes incidental to orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 18:331-352.
31. ShengyiT, YinghuaX. 1991. Biomechanical properties and collagen fiber orientation of TMJ disks in dogs: part 2. Tensile mechanical properties of the disks. J Cranio Disord. 5:107-114.
32. Silva FilhoOGS, OzawaTO, OkadaCH, OkadaHY, DahmenL. 2007. Intentional ankylosis of the deciduous canines to enhance maxillary protaction. A prospective cephalometric analysis. Rev Dent Press Orthod Orthop Facial. 11(6):63-72.
33. TauscheE, LuckO, HarzerW. 2004. Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Euro J Orthod. 26(3):237-244.
34. TurnerCH, AnneV, PidapartiRMV. 1997. An uniform strain criterion for trabecular bone adaptation: do continuum-level strain gradients drive adaptation. J Biomech. 30:555-563.
35. WatabayashiN, OnaM, SuzukiT, IgarashiY. 2008. Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications. J Dent. 36(7):463-471.
36. Xiao-naL, Yun-kaiS, Zhen-ChunL, Chao-yingS, Xiao-dongC, Zhen-qunG, HongG, Xiao-taoC. 2008. Three-dimensional finite element analisys of a maxillary central incisor restored with different post-cone materials. Int Chin J Dent. 8:21-27.