The indirect effect of attention bias on memory via interpretation bias: Evidence for the combined cognitive bias hypothesis in subclinical depression

Cognition and Emotion

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1450-1459

  Everaert, Jonas ^a   Tierens, Marlies ^b   Uzieblo, Kasia ^b   Koster, Ernst H W ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b Thomas More University College   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive processing; Combined cognitive bias hypothesis; Depression; Interpretation; Memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; BOOTSTRAPPING; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; INTERPRETATION; INTERVENING VARIABLE; MALE; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COGNITION; CUES; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PRODROMAL SYMPTOMS;

EID: 84887859009     PISSN: 02699931     EISSN: 14640600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.787972     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baert, S., De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Depression-related attentional bias: The influence of symptom severity and symptom specificity. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1044-1052.
2. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory - II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
3. Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (1999). Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression. New York, NY: Wiley.
4. De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Understanding vulnerability for depression from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: A reappraisal of attentional factors and a new conceptual framework. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 50-70.
5. Ellis, A. J., Beevers, C. G., & Wells, T. T. (2011). Attention allocation and incidental recognition of emotional information in dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35, 425-433.
6. Everaert, J., Duyck, W., & Koster, E. H. W. (2013). Attention, interpretation, and memory biases in subclinical depression: A proof-of-principle test of the combined cognitive bias hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. Everaert, J., Koster, E. H. W., & Derakshan, N. (2012). The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 413-424.
8. Gotlib, I. H., & Joormann, J. (2010). Cognition and depression: Current status and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 285-312.
9. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.
10. Hertel, P. T., & Brozovich, F. (2010). Cognitive habits and memory distortions in anxiety and depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 155-160.
11. Hertel, P. T., & El-Messidi, L. (2006). Am I blue? Depressed mood and the consequences of self-focus for the interpretation and recall of ambiguous words. Behavior Therapy, 37, 259-268.
12. Hirsch, C. R., Clark, D. M., & Mathews, A. (2006). Imagery and interpretations in social phobia: Support for the combined cognitive biases hypothesis. Behavior Therapy, 37, 223-236.
13. Joormann, J., Yoon, K. L., & Zetsche, U. (2007). Cognitive inhibition in depression. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 12, 128-139.
14. Koster, E. H. W., De Raedt, R., Leyman, L., & De Lissnyder, E. (2010). Mood-congruent attention and memory bias in dysphoria: Exploring the coherence among information-processing biases. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 219-225.
15. Koster, E. H. W., Fox, E., & MacLeod, C. (2009). Introduction to the special section on cognitive bias modification in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 1-4.
16. Koster, E. H. W., Leyman, L., De Raedt, R., & Crombez, G. (2006). Cueing of visual attention by emotional facial expressions: The influence of individual differences in anxiety and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 329-339.
17. Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1031-1056.
18. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Hilt, L. M. (2009). Gender differences in depression. I. A. Goblib, & C. L. Hammen (Eds.), (2nd ed.). Handbook of depression (pp. 386-404). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
20. Rude, S. S., Wenzlaff, R. M., Gibbs, B., Vane, J., & Whitney, T. (2002). Negative processing biases predict subsequent depressive symptoms. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 423-440.
21. Salemink, E., Hertel, P., & Mackintosh, B. (2010). Interpretation training influences memory for prior interpretations. Emotion, 10, 903-907.
22. Tran, T. B., Hertel, P. T., & Joormann, J. (2011). Cognitive bias modification: Induced interpretive biases affect memory. Emotion, 11, 145-152.
23. Van der Does, A. J. W. (2002). Handleiding bij de Nederlandse versie van de Beck Depression Inventory - second edition (BDI-II-NL) [The Dutch version of the Beck Depresion Inventory-II]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
24. Wenzlaff, R. M., & Bates, D. E. (1998). Unmasking a cognitive vulnerability to depression: How lapses in mental control reveal depressive thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1559-1571.
25. Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. New York, NY: Wiley.