Greatest 'HITS': A new tool for tracking impacts at the national institute of environmental health sciences

Research Evaluation

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 307-315

  Drew, Christina H ^a   Pettibone, Kristianna G ^a   Ruben, Elizabeth ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887857434     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: 14715449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvt022     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Boyack, K. W. and Jordan, P. (2011) 'Metrics Associated with NIH Funding: A High-Level View', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18/4: 423-31.
2. Engel-Cox, J. A. et al. (2008) 'Conceptual Model of Comprehensive Research Metrics for Improved Human Health and Environment', Environmental Health Perspectives, 116/5: 583-92.
3. Graham, K. E. R. et al. (2012) 'Evaluating Health Research Impact: Development and Implementation of the Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions Impact Framework', Research Evaluation, 21: 354-67.
4. Guthrie, K. et al. (2005) 'The Challenge of Assessing Policy and Advocacy Activities: Strategies for a Prospective Evaluation Approach', The California Endowment, accessed 1 July 2013.
5. Haak, L. et al. (2012) 'The Electronic Scientific Portfolio Assistant: Integrating Scientific Knowledge Databases to Support Program Impact Assessment', Science and Public Policy, 39/4: 1-12.
6. Liebow, E. et al. (2009) 'Toward the Assessment of Scientific and Public Health Impacts of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Extramural Asthma Research Program Using Available Data', Environmental Health Perspectives, 117/7: 1147-54.
7. NIEHS. (2012) Partnerships for Environmental Public Health: Evaluation Metrics Manual, (NIH Publication No. 12-7825) accessed 14 May 2013.
8. NIH Office of Budget. (2011) Spending History by Institute/Center, Mechanism, accessed 18 May 2013.
9. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (1993) Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. Public Law, pp. 103-62. Washington, D.C.
10. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2009) 'Memorandum: Increased Emphasis on Program Evaluations (M-10-01)', Washington, D.C.
11. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2010) 'Government Performance and Results Modernization Act of 2010, H. R. 2142', Washington, D.C.
12. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2012) 'Memorandum: Use of Evidence and Evaluation in the 2014 Budget (M-12-14)', Washington, D.C.
13. Orians, C. et al. (2009) 'Scientific and Public Health Impacts of the NIEHS Extramural Asthma Research Program - Insights from Primary Data', Research Evaluation, 18/5: 375-85.
14. Sarli, C. et al. (2010) 'Beyond Citation Analysis: A Model for Assessment of Research Impact', Journal of the Medical Library Association, 98/1: 17-23.
15. Stuart, J. (2007) 'Necessity Leads to Innovative Evaluation Approach and Practice', Evaluation Exchange, XII/1: 2.
16. Teles, S. and Schmitt, M. (2011) 'The Elusive Craft of Evaluating Advocacy', Stanford Social Innovation, Review 4: 39-43.
17. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBCS). (2001) 'Guide for the Development of Results-based Management and Accountability Frameworks', accessed 14 May 2013.