Communication in the operating theatre

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 100, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 1677-1688

  Weldon, S M ^a   Korkiakangas, T ^a   Bezemer, J ^b   Kneebone, R ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COOPERATION; GENERAL SURGERY; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; META ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPERATING ROOM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; REVIEW; STANDARD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GENERAL SURGERY; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AS TOPIC; OPERATING ROOMS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SAFETY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84887831531     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9332     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008; 372: 139-144.
2. Makary MA, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB, Syin D, Goodrich E, Hartmann E, et al. Operating room briefings and wrong-site surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 236-243.
3. Lingard L, Regehr G, Espin S, Whyte S,. A theory-based instrument to evaluate team communication in the operating room: balancing measurement authenticity and reliability. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 422-426.
4. World Health Organization. 10 Facts on Patient Safety; 2012. http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/patient-safety/en/index.html [accessed 5 September 2012].
5. Adams JG, Bohan JS,. System contributions to error. Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7: 1189-1193.
6. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, Badihi Y, Biesky M, Sprung CL, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 294-300.
7. Schaefer HG, Helmreich RL,. The importance of human factors in the operating room. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 479.
8. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD,. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1995; 163: 458-471.
9. Spafford MM, Lingard L, Schryer CF, Hrynchak PK,. Tensions in the field: teaching standards of practice in optometry case presentations. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 800-806.
10. Knifed E, Goyal A, Bernstein M,. Moral angst for surgical residents: a qualitative study. Am J Surg 2010; 199: 571-576.
11. Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM, Lipsitz SR, Rogers SO, Zinner MJ, et al. Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 533-540.
12. Lingard L, Reznick R, Espin S, Regehr G, DeVito I,. Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Acad Med 2002; 77: 232-237.
13. Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker GR, Reznick R, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13: 330-334.
14. Critical Appraisals Skills Programme. Qualitative Research: Appraisal Tool. 10 Questions to Help You Make Sense of Qualitative Research. Public Health Resource Unit: Oxford, 2006.
15. Thomson Reuters. EndNote® X5; 2011. http://endnote.com/ [accessed 21 September 2013]
16. Noblit GW, Hare RD,. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. SAGE Publications: Newbury Park, 1988.
17. Hindmarsh J, Pilnick A,. The tacit order of teamwork: collaboration and embodied conduct in anesthesia. The Sociological Quarterly 2002; 43: 139-164.
18. Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM, Sheridan TB, Gandhi TK, Dwyer K, et al. A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 2006; 139: 159-173.
19. Riley R, Manias E,. Governing time in operating rooms. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15: 546-553.
20. Riley RG, Manias E,. Governance in operating room nursing: nurses' knowledge of individual surgeons. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 1541-1551.
21. Riley R, Manias E, Polglase A,. Governing the surgical count through communication interactions: implications for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 369-374.
22. Riley R, Forsyth R, Manias E, Iedema R,. Whiteboards: mediating professional tensions in clinical practice. Commun Med 2007; 4: 165-175.
23. Sanchez Svensson M, Heath C, Luff P,. Instrumental action: the timely exchange of implements during surgical operations. In ECSCW 2007: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Limerick, Ireland, 24-28 September 2007, Bannon LJ, Wagner I, Gutwin C, Harper THR, Schmidt K, (eds). Springer: London, 2007; 41-60.
24. Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA,. Distracting communications in the operating theatre. J Eval Clin Pract 2007; 13: 390-394.
25. Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Darzi A, Vincent CA,. Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery. World J Surg 2007; 31: 1373-1381.
26. Finn R., The language of teamwork: reproducing professional divisions in the operating theatre. Human Relations 2008; 61: 103-130.
27. Gardezi F, Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Orser B, Baker GR,. Silence, power and communication in the operating room. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 1390-1399.
28. Riley R, Manias E,. Gatekeeping practices of nurses in operating rooms. Soc Sci Med 2009; 69: 215-222.
29. Zheng B, Swanström LL,. Video analysis of anticipatory movements performed by surgeons during laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1494-1498.
30. Zheng B, Taylor MD, Swanström LL,. An observational study of surgery-related activities between nurses and surgeons during laparoscopic surgery. Am J Surg 2009; 197: 497-502.
31. Bahl R, Murphy DJ, Strachan B,. Non-technical skills for obstetricians conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries: qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 150: 147-151.
32. Collin K, Paloniemi S, Mecklin J-P,. Promoting inter-professional teamwork and learning-the case of a surgical operating theatre. Journal of Education and Work 2010; 23: 43-63.
33. Finn R, Learmonth M, Reedy P,. Some unintended effects of teamwork in healthcare. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70: 1148-1154.
34. Moore A, Butt D, Ellis-Clarke J, Cartmill J,. Linguistic analysis of verbal and non-verbal communication in the operating room. ANZ J Surg 2010; 80: 925-929.
35. Bezemer J, Cope A, Kress G, Kneebone R,. 'Do you have another Johan?' Negotiating meaning in the operating theatre. Applied Linguistics Review 2011; 2: 313-334.
36. Bezemer J, Murtagh G, Cope A, Kress G, Kneebone R,. 'Scissors, please': the practical accomplishment of surgical work in the operating theater. Symbolic Interaction 2011; 34: 398-414.
37. Koschmann T, Zemel A,. 'So that's the ureter.' The informal logic of discovering work. Ethnographic Studies 2011; 12: 31-46.
38. Koschmann T, LeBaron C, Goodwin C, Feltovich P,. 'Can you see the cystic artery yet?' A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics 2011; 43: 521-541.
39. Mondada L,. [ Coordinating actions in the operating theatre. The creation of a common space of vision, action and participation in the interaction.] Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa 2011; 4: 9-38.
40. Mondada L., Operating together through videoconference: members' procedures for accomplishing a common space of action. In Orders of Ordinary Action: REspecting Sociological Knowledge, Hester A, Francis D, (eds). Ashgate: Aldershot, 2011; 51-67.
41. Schraagen JM,. Dealing with unforeseen complexity in the OR: the role of heedful interrelating in medical teams. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2011; 12: 256-272.
42. Koschmann T, LeBaron C, Goodwin C, Zemel A, Dunnington G,. Formulating the Triangle of Doom: Le Geste dans son Contexte. 2nd Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies (ISGS), Lyons, 2004.
43. Timmons S, Tanner J,. A disputed occupational boundary: operating theatre nurses and operating department practitioners. Sociol Health Illn 2004; 26: 645-666.
44. Hazlehurst B, McMullen CK, Gorman PN,. Distributed cognition in the heart room: how situation awareness arises from coordinated communications during cardiac surgery. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40: 539-551.
45. Hindmarsh J, Pilnick A,. Knowing bodies at work: embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies 2007; 28: 1395-1416.
46. ElBardissi AW, Wiegmann DA, Henrickson S, Wadhera R, Sundt TM III,. Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 1027-1033.
47. Manser T, Howard SK, Gaba DM,. Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: a study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics 2008; 51: 1153-1178.
48. Zheng B, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, Swanström LL,. A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2171-2177.
49. Undre S, Sevdalis N, McDermott J, Giddie J, Dinner L, Smith G,. Interruptions, teamwork, and safety in the operating room: a prospective quantitative study in urological surgery. Eur Urol Suppl 2011; 10: 60.
50. Zemel A, Koschmann T, LeBaron C,. Pursuing a response: prodding recognition and expertise within a surgical team. In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, Streeck J, Goodwin C, LeBaron C, (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2011; 227-242.
51. Svensson MS, Luff P, Heath C,. Embedding instruction in practice: contingency and collaboration during surgical training. Sociol Health Illn 2009; 31: 889-906.
52. Belyansky I, Martin TR, Prabhu AS, Tsirline VB, Howley LD, Phillips R, et al. Poor resident-attending intraoperative communication may compromise patient safety. J Surg Res 2011; 171: 386-394.