What's a name worth?: Experimental tests of the value of attribution in intellectual property

Boston University Law Review

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1389-1435

  Sprigman, Christopher Jon ^a   Buccafusco, Christopher ^b   Burns, Zachary ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b IIT Chicago Kent   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887779409     PISSN: 00068047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. KAL RAUSTIALA & CHRISTOPHER SPRIGMAN, THE KNOCKOFF ECONOMY: HOW IMITATION SPARKS INNOVATION 178-79, 185-88 (2012)
2. Christopher J. Buccafusco, On the Legal Consequences of Sauces: Should Thomas Keller's Recipes Be Per Se Copyrightable?, 24 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 1121, 1151-54
3. Emmanuelle Fauchart & Eric von Hipple, Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefts, 19 ORG. SCI. 187, 191-94 (2008)
4. Catherine L. Fisk, Credit Where It;s Due : The Law and Norms of Attribution, 95 GEO. L.J. 49, 76-101 (2006)
5. Christopher Buccafusco & Christopher Jon Sprigman, The Creativity Effect, 78 U. CHI. L. REV. 31, 31-32 (2011)
6. Christopher Buccafusco & Christopher Sprigman, Valuing Intellectual Property: An Experiment, 96 CORNELL L. REV. 1, 4-5 (2010)
7. Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Inspiration and Innovation: The Intrinsic Dimension of the Artistic Soul, 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1945, 1992-93 (2006)
8. R.H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J.L. & ECON. 1, 19 (1960)
9. RICHARD A. POSNER, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW 10,63-67 (8th ed. 2011)
10. WILLIAM M. LANDES & RICHARD A. POSNER, THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 71-84 (2003)
11. DAN ARIELY, PREDICTABLY IRRATIONAL 127-38 (2008)
12. Ziv Carmon & Dan Ariely, Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers, 27 J. CONSUMER RES. 360, 368-69 (2000)
13. Herbert Hovenkamp, Legal Policy and the Endowment Effect, 20 J. LEGAL STUD. 225, 238-47 (1991)
14. Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem, 98 J. POL. ECON. 1325, 1329-36 (1990)
15. Russell Korobkin, The Endowment Effect and Legal Analysis, 97 Nw. U. L. REV. 1227, 1229 (2003)
16. Richard Thaler, Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice, 1 J. ECON. BEHAV. & ORG. 39,43-47 (1980)
17. Gregory Klass & Kathryn Zeiler, Against Endowment Theory: Experimental Economics and Legal Scholarship 3-5 (Georgetown Pub. Law Research Paper No. 13-013, Georgetown Law and Econ. Research Paper No. 13-005, 2013), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2224105
18. Charles R. Plott & Kathryn Zeiler, The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the "Endowment Effect," Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations, 95 AM. ECON. REV. 530 (2005)
19. Katherine Burson, David Faro & Yuval Rottenstreich, Multiple-Unit Holdings Yield Attenuated Endowment Effects, 59 MGMT. SCI. 545,546(2013)
20. Nikolaus Franke et al., The "I Designed It Myself" Effect in Mass Customization, 56 MGMT. SCI. 125, 136-37 (2010)
21. Michael I. Norton et al., The "Ikea Effect": When Labor Leads to Love 2-3 (Harvard Bus. Sch. Working Paper No. 11-091,2011), available at http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/ll-091.pdf
22. ERIC S. RAYMOND, THE CATHEDRAL AND THE BAZAAR 64 (1999)
23. Laura A. Heymann, The Trademark/Copyright Divide, 60 SMU L. REV. 55, 65 (2007)
24. Henry Hansmann & Marina Santilli, Authors ' and Artists ' Moral Rights: A Comparative Legal and Economic Analysis, 26 J. LEGAL STUD. 95, 97 (1997)
25. Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Copyright and the Moral Right: Is an American Marriage Possible?, 38 VAND. L. REV. 1, 10 & n.38 (1985).
26. LIONEL BENTLY & BRAD SHERMAN, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 244-49 (3d ed. 2009).
27. Glenn Otis Brown, Announcing (and Explaining) Our New 2.0 Licenses, CREATIVE COMMONS (May 25,2004), http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4216.
28. Rebecca Tushnet, Naming Rights: Attribution and Law, 2007 UTAH L. REV. 789, 792-93.
29. Compare, e.g., Ghostwriting FAQ, DENNIS LOWERY, http://www.dennislowery. com/blog/ghostwriting-faq.html (last visited May 22, 2013)
30. AMAZON MECHANICAL TURK, https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome (last visited May 22, 2013)
31. QUALTRICS, http://www.qualtrics.com (last visited May 22,2013).
32. Institutional Review Board for Social & Behavioral Sciences, U. VA., http://www.virginia.edu/vpr/irb/sbs (last visited May 22, 2013).
33. Eric J. Johnson & Daniel Goldstein, Do Defaults Save Lives?, 302 SCIENCE 1338, 1338 (2003).
34. Richard H. McAdams, An Attitudinal Theory of Expressive Law, 79 OR. L. REV. 339, 340 (2000)
35. Cass R. Sunstein, On the Expressive Function of Law, 144 U. PA. L. REV. 2021,2032 (1996)
36. Russell B. Korobkin & Thomas S. Ulen, Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics, 88 CALIF. L. REV. 1051, 1107-10 (2000)
37. Marilynn B. Brewer, Research Design and Issues of Validity, in HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH METHODS IN SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY 3, 12 (Harry T. Reis & Charles M. Judd eds., 2000)
38. Russell Korobkin, Who Wins in Settlement Negotiations?, 11 AM. L. & ECON. REV. 162, 196 (2009)
39. Guido Calabresi & A. Douglas Melamed, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, 85 HARV. L. REV. 1089,1092 (1972).
40. Jeffrey J. Rachlinski & Forest Jourden, Remedies and the Psychology of Ownership, 51 VAND. L. REV. 1541, 1555 (1998)
41. Russell Korobkin, Policymaking and the Offer/Asking Price Gap: Toward a Theory of Efficient Entitlement Allocation, 46 STAN. L. REV. 663, 665 (1994).