Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of french chefs

Organization Science

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 187-201

  Fauchart, Emmanuelle ^a   Von Hippel, Eric ^b  

^a Bioinformatique et Chimie Moléculaire   (France)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Copyrights; Intellectual property systems; Patents; Recipes; Social norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 61349203966     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0314     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. AIPLA. 2005. Report of the Economic Survey. American Intellectual Property Association Law Practice Management Committee, Arlington, VA.
2. Allen, R. C. 1983. Collective invention. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 4(1) 1-24.
3. Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York.
4. Axlerod, R. 1986. An evolutionary approach to norms. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 80(4) 1095-1111.
5. Bendor, J., P. Swistak. 2001. The evolution of norms. Amer. J. Social. 106(6) 1493-1545.
6. Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
7. Bernstein, L. 1992. Opting out of the legal system: Extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry. J. Legal Stud. 21 115-157.
8. Bessen, J., M. J. Meurer. 2008. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Forthcoming.
9. Bouty, I. 2000. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Acad. Management J. 43(1) 50-65.
10. Buccafusco, C. J. 2007. On the legal consequences of sauces: Should Thomas Keller's recipes be per se copyrightable? Cardozo Arts Entertainment Law J. 24(3) 1121-1156.
11. Cox, C., J. Jenkins. 2005. Between the seams, a fertile commons: An overview of the relationship between fashion and intellectual property. Norman Lear Center Publication, Duke University Law School, Durham, NC, 4-20.
12. Dasgupta, P., P. A. David. 1994. Toward a new economics of science. Policy Res. 23 487-521.
13. eGForums. The eGullet Society for Culinary Arts and Letters. http://forums.egullet.org/index.php?showtopic=84509&st=0&p= 1149705&#entry 1149705.
14. Ellickson, R. C. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Elster, J. 1989. Social norms and economic theory. J. Econom. Perspectives 3(4) 99-117.
16. Feldman, D. 1984. The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. 9(1) 47-53.
17. Gibbs, J. 1965. Norms: The problem of definition and classification. Amer. J. Social. 70(5) 586-594.
18. Greif, A. 1993. Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders' coalition. AER 83(3) 525-548.
19. Hackman, J. R. 1976. Group influences on individuals. M. Dunnette, ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1455-1525.
20. Hall, B. H., D. Harhoff. 2004. Post grant review systems at the U.S. patent office: Design parameters and expected impact. Berkeley Law Tech. J. 19(1)1-27.
21. Hansmann, H., M. Santilli. 1997. Authors and artists moral rights: A comparative legal and economic analysis. J. Legal Stud. 26(January) 95-143.
22. Harhoff, D., J. Henkel, E. von Hippel. 2003. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy 32(10) 1753-1769.
23. Jaffe, A. B., J. Lerner. 2004. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress and What to do About It. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
24. Johnson, C., B. Surlemont, P. Nicod, F. Revaz. 2005. Behind the stars: A concise typology of Michelin restaurants in Europe. Cornell Hotel Restaurant Admin. Quart. 46(2) 170-187.
25. Kesan, J. P., G. G. Ball. 2006. How are patent cases resolved? An empirical examination of the adjudication and settlement of patent disputes. Washington University, Law Rev. 84 237-312.
26. Kreiner, K., M. Schultz. 1993. Informal collaboration in R&D. The formation of networks across organizations. Organ. Stud. 14(2) 189-209.
27. Lerner, J., J. Tirole. 2002. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2) 197-234.
28. Macaulay, S. 1963. Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. Amer. Social. Rev. 28(55).
29. Merges, R. 1996a. Contracting into liability rules: Intellectual property rights and collective rights organizations. Californial Law Rev. 84(October) 1293-1393.
30. Merges, R. 1996b. Property rights and the commons: The case of scientific research. Soc. Philosophy Policy 13 145-153.
31. Merges, R. 2004. From medieval guilds to open source software: Informal norms, appropriability institutions, and innovation. Univ. Wisconson Law School Inst. Legal Stud. Conf. Legal Hist. Intellectual Property (November 13).
32. Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
33. Nguyen, K. 2006. The good feud guide. TheAge.com.au (March 26). http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/03/25/1143084055425.html#.
34. Nouvel Observateur. 2005. Michelin 2005: 3 étoiles pour Régis Marcon.
35. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
36. Rai, A. K. 1999. Regulating scientific research: Intellectual property rights and the norms of science. Northwestern University Law Rev. 94(1) 77-152.
37. Raustiala, K., C. Sprigman. 2006. The piracy paradox: Innovation and intellectual property in fashion design. Virginia Law Rev. 92(8) 1687-1777.
38. Rimal, R., K. Real. 2003. Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Comm. Theory 13 184-203.
39. Schrader, S. 1991. Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading. Res. Policy 20 153-169.
40. Simoni, C. 2003. Mastering the Dynamics of Apparel Innovation. Firenze University Press, Firenze, Italy.
41. Sitkin, S. B. 1995. On the positive effect of the legalization of trust. R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, eds. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 5. JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT, 185-217.
42. Strandburg, K. 2008. Users as innovators: Implications for patent doctrine. Univ. Colorado Law Rev. Forthcoming.
43. Veblen, T 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Republished in Penguin 20th Century Classics, Penguin Books (1994).
44. von Hippel, E. 1987. Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Res. Policy 16 291-302.
45. von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
46. Walsh, J. P., C. Cho, W. M. Cohen. 2005. View from the bench: Patents and materials transfers. Science 309(September 23) 2002-2003.
47. Zhou, K. Z., L. Poppo. 2005. Relational contracts in China: Relational governance and contract assurance. Working paper, Virginia Tech.