A modified Kennard-Stone algorithm for optimal division of data for developing artificial neural network models

Chemical Product and Process Modeling

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Saptoro, Agus ^a   Tadé, Moses O ^a   Vuthaluru, Hari ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

ANN models; Data division; Kennard Stone algorithm; MDKS

Indexed keywords

ANN MODELS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK MODELS; DATA DIVISION; DATA REPRESENTATIONS; KENNARD-STONE ALGORITHM; MAHALANOBIS DISTANCES; MDKS; VARIANCE-COVARIANCE MATRICES;

COVARIANCE MATRIX; NEURAL NETWORKS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84887622153     PISSN: 21946159     EISSN: 19342659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/1934-2659.1645     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Atkinson, A. C. 1995. Beyond response surfaces: recent developments in optimum experimental design. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 28, 35-47.
2. Bowden, G. J., Maier, H. R., & Dandy, G. C. 2002. Optimal data division for neural network models in water resources applications. Water Resources Research 38(2), 1-11.
3. De Aguiar, P. F., Bourguignon, B., Khots, M. S., Massart, D. L., & Phan-Than-Luu, R. 1995. D-optimal designs. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 30, 199-210.
4. Flood, I., & Kartam, N. 1994. Neural networks in civil engineering. I: Principles and understanding. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 8(2), 131-148.
5. Galvão, R. K. H., Araujo, M. C. U., José, G. E., Pontes, M. J. C., Silva, E. C. & Saldanha, T. C. B. 2005. A method for calibration and validation subset partitioning. Talanta 67, 736-740.
6. Hatch, J. R., Bullock Jr., J. H., & Finkelman, R. B. 2006. Chemical Analyses of Coal, Coal-Associated Rocks and Coal Combustion Products Collected for the National Coal Quality Inventory. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1162/ (retrieved on 3 April 2008).
7. Kennard, R. W. & Stone, L. A. 1969. Computer Aided Design of Experiments. Technometrics 11(1), 137-148.
8. Kocjančič, R., & Zupan, J. 2000. Modelling of the river flowrate: the influence of the training set selection. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 54, 21-34.
9. Maesschalck, R. D., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., & Massart, D. L. 2000. The Mahalanobis Distance. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 50(1), 1-18.
10. Maier, H. R., & Dandy, G. C. 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software 15, 101-124.
11. Maier, H. R., Jain, A., Dandy, G. C., & Sudheer, K. P. 2010. Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: Current status and future directions. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 891-909.
12. Minns, A. W., & Hall, M. J. 1996. Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrological Sciences Journal 41(3), 399-417.
13. Rajer-Kanduč, K., Zupan, J., & Majcen, N. 2003. Separation of data on the training and test set for modelling: a case study for modelling of five colour properties of a white pigment. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 65, 221-229.
14. Saptoro, A., Yao, H. M., Tadé, M. O., & Vuthaluru, H. B. 2008. Prediction of coal hydrogen content for combustion control in power utility using neural network approach. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 94, 149-159.
15. Shahin, M. A., Maier, H. R., & Jaksa, M. B. 2004. Data division for developing neural networks applied to geotechnical engineering. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 18(2), 105-114.
16. Wu, W., Walczak, B., Massart, D. L., Heuerding, S., Erni, F., Last, I. R., & Prebble, K. A. 1996. Artificial neural networks in classification of NIR spectral data: Design of the training set. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 33, 35-46.