Porous tantalum tibial component prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty for five years-a matched cohort study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1760-1764

  Minoda, Yukihide ^a   Kobayashi, Akio ^a,b   Ikebuchi, Mitsuhiko ^a   Iwaki, Hiroyoshi ^a   Inori, Fumiaki ^a   Nakamura, Hiroaki ^a  

^a OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Shiraniwa Hosp   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Porous tantalum tibial component; Total knee prosthesis

Indexed keywords

LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE;

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CEMENTED COBALT CHROMIUM TIBIAL COMPONENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; POROUS TANTALUM TIBIAL COMPONENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TIBIAL KNEE PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

BONE MINERAL DENSITY; POROUS TANTALUM TIBIAL COMPONENT; TOTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE DENSITY; BONE RESORPTION; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TANTALUM; TIBIA;

EID: 84887616340     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.031     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Saari T., Uvehammer J., Carlsson L., et al. Joint area constraint had no influence on bone loss in proximal tibia 5years after total knee replacement. J Orthop Res 2007, 25:798.
2. Abu-Rajab R.B., Watson W.S., Walker B., et al. Periprosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:606.
3. Li M.G., Nilsson K.G. Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Orthop Res 2000, 18:40.
4. Petersen M.M., Gehrchen P.M., Ostgaard S.E., et al. Effect of hydroxyapatite-coated tibial components on changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:516.
5. Soininvaara T.A., Miettinen H.J., Jurvelin J.S., et al. Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2004, 75:600.
6. Petersen M.M., Nielsen P.T., Lauritzen J.B., et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 25 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 1995, 66:513.
7. Wang C.J., Wang J.W., Ko J.Y., et al. Three-year changes in bone mineral density around the knee after a six-month course of oral alendronate following total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:267.
8. Wang C.J., Wang J.W., Weng L.H., et al. The effect of alendronate on bone mineral density in the distal part of the femur and proximal part of the tibia after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:2121.
9. Levitz C.L., Lotke P.A., Karp J.S. Long-term changes in bone mineral density following total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 321:68.
10. Petersen M.M., Jensen N.C., Gehrchen P.M., et al. The relation between trabecular bone strength and bone mineral density assessed by dual photon and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in the proximal tibia. Calcif Tissue Int 1996, 59:311.
11. Sugita T., Umehara J., Sato K., et al. Influence of tibial bone quality on loosening of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: long-term results. Orthopedics 1999, 22:213.
12. Petersen M.M., Nielsen P.T., Lebech A., et al. Preoperative bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and migration of the tibial component after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:77.
13. Li M.G., Nilsson K.G. The effect of the preoperative bone quality on the fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:744.
14. Therbo M., Petersen M.M., Varmarken J.E., et al. Influence of preoperative bone mineral content of the proximal tibia on revision rate after uncemented knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:975.
15. DiGioia A.M., Rubash H.E. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. A literature review and treatment algorithm. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 271:135.
16. Haddad F.S., Masri B.A., Garbuz D.S., et al. The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1999, 30:191.
17. Felix N.A., Stuart M.J., Hanssen A.D. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997, 345:113.
18. Levine B., Della Valle C.J., Jacobs J.J. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006, 14:646.
19. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999, 81:907.
20. Minoda Y., Kobayashi A., Iwaki H., et al. Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:700.
21. Hernandez-Vaquero D., Garcia-Sandoval M.A., Fernandez-Carreira J.M., et al. Influence of the tibial stem design on bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: a prospective seven-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 2008, 32:47.
22. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
23. Kim Y.H., Sohn K.S., Kim J.S. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1470.