Joint area constraint had no influence on bone loss in proximal tibia 5 years total knee replacement

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 798-803

  Saari, Tuuli ^a   Uvehammer, Johan ^a   Carlsson, Lons ^a   Regnér, Lons ^a   Kärrholm, Johan ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE LIGAMENT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; BONE RESORPTION; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIBIA;

EID: 34249691321     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20358     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Li MG, Nilsson KG. 2000. Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: A 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Orthop Res 18:40-47.
2. Li MG, Nilsson KG. 2001. No relationship between post-operative changes in bone density at the proximal tibia and the migration of the tibial component 2 years after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:893-900.
3. Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C, et al. 2001. Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty 16:107-111.
4. Soininvaara T, Kroger H, Jurvelin JS, et al. 2000. Measurement of bone density around total knee arthroplasty using fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 67:267-272.
5. Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, et al. 2004. Periprosthetic femoral bone loss after total knee arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Knee 11:297-302.
6. Soininvaara. TA, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, et al. 2004. Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:600-605.
7. van Lenthe GH, de Waal MaleflJt MC, Huiskes R. 1997. Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79:117-122.
8. Saari T, Uvehammer J, Carlsson LV, et al. 2003. Kinematics of three variations of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 410:235-247.
9. Uvehammer J, Kärrholm J, Brandsson S. 2000. In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty, concave versus posterior-stabilised tibial joint surface. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:499-505.
10. Uvehammer J, Kärrhohn J, Brandsson S, et al. 2000. In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty: Flat compared with concave tibial joint surfaces. J Orthop Res 18:856-864.
11. Hagstedt B, Norman O, Ohlsson TH, et al. 1980. Technical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 51:963-970.
12. Pocock SJ. 1983. Clinical trials. A practical approach. Chichester: Wiley.
13. Saari T, Uvehammer J, Carlsson LV, et al. 2006. Influence of polyethylene constraint on tibial component fixation total knee arthroplasty. Follow-up report after 5 years. J Arthroplasty 21:1032-1037.
14. Uvehammer J, Kärrholm J, Regnér L, et al. 200 1. Concave versus posterior-stabilized tibial joint surface in total knee arthroplasty. Randomized evaluation of 47 knees. J Arthroplasty 16:25-32.
15. Uvehammer J, Regnér L, Kärrholm J. 2001. Flat vs. Concave tibial joint surface in total knee arthroplasty. Randomized evaluation of 39 cases using radiostereometry. Acta Orthop Scand 72:257-265.
16. Nilsson KG, Björnebrink J, Hietala SO, et al. 1992. Scintimetry after total knee arthroplasty. Prospective 2-year study of 18 cases of arthrosis and 15 cases of rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Orthop Scand 63:159-165.
17. Regner LR, Carlsson LV, Karrholm JN, et al. 1999. Bone mineral and migratory patterns in uncemented total knee arthroplasties: a randomized 5-year follow-up study of 38 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 70:603-608.
18. Muller S, Irgens F, Aamodt A. 2005. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of bone remodeling around custom uncemented femoral stems: a five-year DEXA follow-up. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20:277-282.
19. Li MG, Nilsson KG. 2000. The effect of the preoperative bone quality on the fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:744-753.
20. Spittlehouse AJ, Getty CJ, Eastell R. 1999. Measurement of bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry around an uncemented knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 14:957-963.
21. Trevisan C, Bigoni M, Randelli G, et al. 1997. Periprosthetic bone density around fully hydroxyapatite coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 340:109-117.
22. Digas G. 2005. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 76:3-82.
23. Wilkinson JM, Peel NF, Elson RA, et al. 2001. Measuring bone mineral density of the pelvis and proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:283-288.
24. Li MG, Nilsson KG, Nivbrant B. 2004. Decreased precision for BMD measurements in the prosthetic knee using a non-knee-specific software. J Clin Densitom 7:319-325.