A model for integrated ethics consultation

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 307-313

  Gottlieb, Michael C ^a   Handelsman, Mitchell M ^b   Knapp, Samuel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c Pennsylvania Psychological Association   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict of interest; Consultation; Ethical decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887552905     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0033541     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from www.apa.org/ethics
2. Anderson, S. K., Wagoner, H., & Moore, G. K. (2006). Ethical choice: An outcome of being, blending, and doing. In P. Williams & S. K. Anderson (Eds.), Law and ethics in coaching: How to solve and avoid difficult problems in your practice (pp. 39-61). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3. Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. G. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what's right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Brown, D., Pryzwansky, W. B., & Schulte, A. C. (2006). Psychological consultation and collaboration (6th ed. ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Brown, R. P., Tamborski, M., Wang, X., Barnes, C. D., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2011). Moral credentialing and the rationalization of misconduct. Ethics & Behavior, 21, 1-12. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2011.537566
6. Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Lowenstein, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74-95). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511610332.006
7. Cooper, M. J., & Pullig, C. (2011). I'm number one! Does narcissism impair ethical judgment even for the highly religious? Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved from http://ts-si.org/files/doi101007s1055101212390.pdf. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1239-0
8. Cottone, R. R. (2012). Ethical decision making in mental health contexts: Representative models and an organizational framework. In S. Knapp, M. Gottlieb, M. M. Handelsman, & L. VandeCreek (Eds.), APA handbook of ethics in psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 99-121). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13271-004
9. Crowley, J., & Gottlieb, M. C. (2012). Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear: A primary prevention approach to ethical decision making. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43, 65-72. doi: 10.1037/a0026212
10. Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Gottlieb, M. C. (2006). A template for ethics consultation. Ethics & Behavior, 16, 151-162. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1602_5
12. Gottlieb, M. C. (2012, August). Conflict of interest: The elephant in the room. In K. Kitchener (Chair), Philosophical and psychological problems with ethical decision making models. Presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Psychological Association, Orlando, FL.
13. Haas, L. J., & Malouf, J. L. (2005). Keeping up the good work: A practitioner's guide to mental health ethics (4th ed. ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
14. Handelsman, M. M., Gottlieb, M. C., & Knapp, S. (2005). Training ethical psychologists: An acculturation model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 59-65. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.36.1.59
15. Handelsman, M. M., Knapp, S. J., & Gottlieb, M. C. (2009). Positive ethics: Themes and variations. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed. ed., pp. 105-113). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0011
16. Johnson, W. B., Barnett, J. E., Elman, N. S., Forrest, L., & Kaslow, N. J. (2012). The competent community: Toward a vital reformulation of professional ethics. American Psychologist, 67, 557-569. doi:10.1037/a0027206
17. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
18. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
19. Kampwith, T. J. (2005). Collaborative consultation in the schools (3rd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
20. Kern, M. C., & Chugh, D. (2009). Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psychological Science, 20, 378-384. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280 .2009.02296.x
21. Knapp, S., Gottlieb, M. C., Berman, J., & Handelsman, M. M. (2007). When law and ethics collide: What should psychologists do? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 54-59. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.1.54
22. Knapp, S. J., & VandeCreek, L. D. (2013). Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach. (2nd ed. ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Knapp, S., Younggren, J. N., VandeCreek, L., Harris, E., & Martin, J. (2013). Assessing and managing risk in psychological practice: An individualized approach. (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: The Trust.
24. Koekkoek, B., van Meijel, B., & Hutschemackers, G. (2006). "Difficult patients" in mental health care: A review. Psychiatric Services, 57, 795-802. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.6.795
25. Pomerantz, A. M. (2012). Ethical? Toward whom? American Psychologist, 67, 324-325. doi:10.1037/a0028119
26. Pope, K. S., & Vasquez, M. J. T. (2007). Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling. (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27. Pronin, E., & Kugler, M. B. (2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 565-578. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006 .05.011
28. Pronin, E., Puccio, C., & Ross, L. (2002). Understanding misunderstanding: Social psychological perspectives. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 636-665). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29. Rogerson, M. D., Gottlieb, M. C., Handelsman, M. M., Knapp, S., & Younggren, J. N. (2011). Nonrational processes in ethical decision making. American Psychologist, 66, 614-623. doi:10.1037/a0025215
30. Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 379-396). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808098.024
31. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511808098.025
32. Stark, A. (2005). Why are (some) conflicts of interest in medicine so uniquely vexing? In D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 152-180). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Thomas, J. T. (2005). Licensing board complaints: Minimizing the impact on the psychologist's defense and clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 426-433.
34. West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (in press). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
35. Wise, E. H., Hersh, M. A., & Gibson, C. M. (2012). Ethics, self-care and well-being for psychologists: Reenvisioning the stress-distress continuum. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43, 487-494.
36. Younggren, J. N., & Gottlieb, M. C. (2004). Managing risk when contemplating multiple relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 255-260.
37. Youssef, F. F., Dookeeram, K., Basdeo, V., Francis, E., Doman, M., Mamed, D., & Legall, G. (2012). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 491-498.