Measuring semantic relatedness using multilingual representations

*SEM 2012 - 1st Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 20-29

  Hassan, Samer ^a   Banea, Carmen ^a   Mihalcea, Rada ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MONOLINGUAL BASELINE; MULTILINGUAL APPROACH; MULTILINGUAL SPACE; SEMANTIC RELATEDNESS; STATE OF THE ART;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84887438692     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. C. Banea and R. Mihalcea. 2011. Word sense disambiguation with multilingual features. In International Conference on Semantic Computing, Oxford, UK.
2. C. Banea, R.Mihalcea, and J.Wiebe. 2010. Multilingual subjectivity: Are more languages better? In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), pages 28-36, Beijing, China, August.
3. R. Besançon and M. Rajman. 2002. Evaluation of a vector space similarity measure in a multilingual framework. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resource and Evaluation (LREC 2002), Las Palmas, Spain.
4. S. Brin, J. Davis, and H. Garcia-Molina. 1995. Copy detection mechanisms for digital documents. In ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD 1995).
5. A. Z. Broder, S. C. Glassman, M. S. Manasse, and G. Zweig. 1997. Syntactic clustering of the web. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst., 29(8-13):1157-1166.
6. A Z. Broder, P. Ciccolo, M. Fontoura, E. Gabrilovich, V. Josifovski, and L. Riedel. 2008. Search advertising using web relevance feedback. In CIKM '08: Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 1013-1022, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
7. C. Burgess, K. Livesay, and K. Lund. 1998. Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes, 25(2):211-257.
8. K. Church and P. Hanks. 1990. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1):22-29.
9. T. Cohn and M. Lapata. 2007. Machine translation by triangulation: making effective use of multi-parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 728-735, Prague, Czech Republic.
10. I. Dagan, O. Glickman, and B.Magnini. 2005. The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Workshop.
11. D. Davidov and A. Rappoport. 2009. Enhancement of lexical concepts using cross-lingual web mining. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 852- 861, Singapore.
12. L. Finkelstein, E. Gabrilovich, Y. Matias, E. Rivlin, Z. Solan, G. Wolfman, and E. Ruppin. 2001. Placing search in context: The concept revisited. In ACM Press, editor, The Tenth International World Wide Web Conference, pages 406-414, Hong Kong.
13. E. Gabrilovich and S. Markovitch. 2007. Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1606-1611, Hyderabad, India.
14. A. Goodrum. 2000. Image information retrieval: An overview of current research. Informing Science, 3(2):63-66.
15. S. Hassan and R. Mihalcea. 2009. Cross-lingual semantic relatedness using encyclopedic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1192- 1201, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. S. Hassan and R. Mihalcea. 2011. Measuring semantic relatedness using salient encyclopedic concepts. Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue, xx(xx).
17. N. Heintze. 1996. Scalable document fingerprinting. In In Proc. USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce.
18. T. C. Hoad and J. Zobel. 2003. Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarized documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 54(3):203-215.
19. A. Islam and D. Inkpen. 2006. Second order cooccurrence PMI for determining the semantic similarity of words. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, volume 2, Genoa, Italy, July.
20. M. Jarmasz and S. Szpakowicz. 2003. Roget's thesaurus and semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing RANLP-2003, Borovetz, Bulgaria, September.
21. J. Kazama, S. De Saeger, K. Kuroda, M. Murata, and K. Torisawa. 2010. A bayesian method for robust estimation of distributional similarities. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden.
22. T. K. Landauer, D. Laham, B. Rehder, and M. E. Schreiner. 1991. How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of latent semantic analysis and humans. In Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 412-417, Mawhwah, N. Erlbaum.
23. C. Leacock and M. Chodorow, 1998. Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification, pages 305-332.
24. M. D. Lee and M. Welsh. 2005. An empirical evaluation of models of text document similarity. In Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 1254-1259, Stresa, Italy.
25. C. W. Leong and R. Mihalcea. 2009. Explorations in automatic image annotation using textual features. In Proceedings of the Third Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pages 56-59, Suntec, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
26. M. Lesk. 1986. Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries. In Proceedings of the 5th annual international conference on Systems documentation - SIGDOC '86, pages 24-26, Toronto, Ontario. ACM Press.
27. W. Li, Q. Lu, and R. Xu. 2005. Similarity based chinese synonym collocation extraction. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 10(1).
28. Y. Li, D. McLean, Z. A. Bandar, J. D. O'Shea, and K. Crockett. 2006. Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18(8):1138- 1150, August.
29. D. Lin. 1998. An information-Theoretic definition of similarity. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 296- 304, Madison, Wisconsin.
30. U. Manber. 1994. Finding similar files in a large file system. In USENIX WINTER 1994 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, pages 1-10.
31. D. Metzler, Y. Bernstein, W. Bruce Croft, A. Moffat, and J. Zobel. 2005. Similarity measures for tracking information flow. In CIKM '05: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 517-524, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
32. D. Metzler, S. T. Dumais, and C. Meek. 2007. Similarity measures for short segments of text. In Giambattista Amati, Claudio Carpineto, and Giovanni Romano, editors, ECIR, volume 4425 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 16-27. Springer.
33. G. A. Miller and W. G. Charles. 1991. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(1):1-28.
34. G. A. Miller. 1995. WordNet: A Lexical database for english. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 38(11):39-41.
35. T. Mitchell, T. Russell, P. Broomhead, and N. Aldridge. 2002. Towards robust computerised marking of freetext responses. In roceedings of the 6th International Computer Assisted Assessment (CAA) Conference, Loughborough, UK. Loughborough University.
36. M. Mohler and R. Mihalcea. 2009a. Text-To-Text semantic similarity for automatic short answer grading. In EACL, pages 567-575. The Association for Computer Linguistics.
37. M. Mohler and R. Mihalcea. 2009b. Text-To-Text semantic similarity for automatic short answer grading. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 567-575, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
38. T. Pedersen, S. Patwardhan, and J. Michelizzi. 2004. WordNet::Similarity - measuring the relatedness of concepts. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-04), demonstrations, San Jose, CA.
39. J. Ponte and W. Croft. 1998. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Annual International SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 275- 281, Melbourne, Australia.
40. S. G. Pulman and J. Z. Sukkarieh. 2005. Automatic short answer marking. In EdAppsNLP 05: Proceedings of the second workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, pages 9-16, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
41. H. Rubenstein and J. B. Goodenough. 1965. Contextual correlates of synonymy. Communications of the ACM, 8(10):627-633, October.
42. M. Sahami and T. D. Heilman. 2006. A web-based kernel function for measuring the similarity of short text snippets. In WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 377- 386, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
43. N. Shivakumar and H. Garcia-Molina. 1995. Scam: A copy detection mechanism for digital documents. In 2nd International Conference in Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (DL 1995).
44. J. Sinclair. 2001. Collins cobuild English dictionary for advanced learners. Harper Collins, 3rd edition.
45. P. D. Turney. 2001. Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 491-502, Freiburg, Germany.
46. Z.Wu and M. Palmer. 1994. Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 133-138, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
47. W. T. Yih and C. Meek. 2007. Improving similarity measures for short segments of text. In AAAI'07: Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 1489-1494. AAAI Press.
48. T. Zesch, I. Gurevych, and M. Mühlhäuser. 2007. Comparing Wikipedia and German Wordnet by Evaluating Semantic Relatedness on Multiple Datasets. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.