Second Order Co-occurrence PMI for determining the semantic similarity of words

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1033-1038

  Islam, Md Aminul ^a   Inkpen, Diana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORPUS-BASED METHODS; ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGES (ESL); ENGLISH-AS-A-FOREIGN-LANGUAGE; EVALUATION RESULTS; POINTWISE MUTUAL INFORMATION; SECOND ORDERS; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY OF WORDS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84962801931     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Brown, P. F., and DeSouza, P. V., Mercer, R. L., Watson, T. J., Della Pietra, V. J. and Lai, J. C. (1992). Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 18:467-479.
2. Budanitsky, Alexander and Hirst, Graeme. (2006). Evaluating WordNet-based measures of semantic distance. Computational Linguistics, 32(1).
3. Buckley, C., Salton, J. A. and Singhal, A. (1995). Automatic query expansion using Smart: TREC 3. In The third Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, MD.
4. Church, K.W. and Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1):22-29.
5. Dagan, I., Lee, L. and Pereira, F.C.N. (1999). Similarity based models of word cooccurrence probabilities. Machine Learning, 34(1-3):43-69.
6. Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19:61-74.
7. th Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New OED and Text Research.
8. Grefenstette, G. (1992). Finding Semantic Similarity in Raw Text: The Deese Antonyms. In: R. Goldman, P. Norvig, E. Charniak and B. Gale (eds.), Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language. AAAI Press, pp. 61-65.
9. Inkpen, Diana and Désilets, Alain. (2005). Semantic Similarity for Detecting Recognition Errors in Automatic Speech Transcripts. EMNLP 2005, Vancouver, Canada.
10. Jarmasz, M. and Szpakowicz, S. (2003). Roget's thesaurus and semantic similarity, International Conference RANLP-2003, Borovets, Bulgaria, pp. 212-219.
11. Landauer, T. K. and Dumais, S. T. (1997). A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of the Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2):211-240.
12. Lee, L. (1999). Measures of distributional similarity. In Proceedings of ACL-1999, pp. 23-32.
13. Lesk, M. E. (1969). Word-word associations in document retrieval systems. American Documentation, 20(1):27-38.
14. Lesk, M. E. (1986). Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone. In Proceedings of the SIGDOC Conference, Toronto.
15. Li, H. and Abe, N. (1998). Word clustering and disambiguation based on co-occurrence data. In COLING-ACL, pp. 749-755.
16. Lin, C. Y. and Hovy, E. H. (2003). Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL 2003), Edmonton, Canada.
17. Lin, D. (1998). Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In COLING-ACL, pp. 768-774.
18. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P., Doan, A. and Halevy, A. (2005). Corpus-based Schema Matching. In International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE-05).
19. Miller, G. A. and Charles, W. G. (1991). Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(1): 1-28.
20. Pantel, P. and Lin, D. (2002). Discovering word senses from text. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 613-619.
21. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S. and Michelizzi, J. (2004). WordNet:: Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts, in Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-04), July 25-29, San Jose, CA (Intelligent Systems Demonstration).
22. Rao, C. R. (1983). Diversity: Its measurement, decomposition, apportionment and analysis. Sankyha: Indian Journal of Statistics, 44(A):1-22.
23. th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, pp. 448-453.
24. Rosenfeld, R. (1996). A maximum entropy approach to adaptive statistical language modeling. Computer speech and language. 10:187-228.
25. Rubenstein, H. and Goodenough, J. B. (1965). Contextual correlates of synonymy. Communications of the ACM, 8(10): 627-633.
26. Salton, G. and McGill, M.J. (1983). Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill.
27. Turney, P. D. (2001). Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-2001), pp. 491-502.
28. nd Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research, Cambridge, England.
29. Weeds, J., Weir, D. and McCarthy, D. (2004). Characterising measures of lexical distributional similarity. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of Computational Linguistics, COLING-2004. Geneva, Switzerland. pp. 1015-1021
30. Xu, J. and Croft, B. (2000). Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 18(1):79-112.
31. Yarowsky, D. (1992). Word-sense disambiguation using statistical models of Roget's categories trained on large corpora. In Proceedings of COLING-92, Nantes, France, pp. 454-460.