Different roles of similarity and predictability in auditory stream segregation

Learning and Perception

Volumn 5, Issue , 2013, Pages 37-54

  Bendixen, Alexandra ^a,b   Bohm, Tamás M ^c,d   Szalárdy, Orsolya ^c   Mill, Robert ^e   Denham, Susan L ^e   Winkler, István ^c,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^d BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Auditory object formation; Auditory scene analysis; Feature proximity; Higher order sound feature; Perceptual Bi stability; Perceptual switching; Primary sound features; Sound patterns; Sound perception; Streaming

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887409363     PISSN: 17893186     EISSN: 20609175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/LP.5.2013.Suppl2.4     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Akeroyd, M. A., Carlyon, R. P., Deeks, J. M. (2005): Can dichotic pitches form two streams? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 977-981.
2. Andreou, L.-V., Kashino, M., Chait, M. (2011): The role of temporal regularity in auditory segregation. Hearing Research, 280, 228-235.
3. Anstis, S., Saida, S. (1985): Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 257-271.
4. Bendixen, A., Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Winkler, I. (2010): Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 3658-3666.
5. Bendixen, A., Prinz, W., Horváth, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., Schröger, E. (2008): Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Neuroimage, 41, 1111-1119.
6. Bregman, A. S. (1978): Auditory streaming is cumulative. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 380-387.
7. Bregman, A. S. (1990): Auditory scene analysis. The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Bregman, A. S. (1993): Auditory scene analysis: Hearing in complex environments. In: McAdams, S., Bigand, E. (eds.): Thinking in Sound. The Cognitive Psychology of Human Audition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 10-36.
9. Cusack, R., Deeks, J., Aikman, G., Carlyon, R. P. (2004): Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 643-656.
10. Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winkler, I. (2010): Stability of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming. In: Lopez-Poveda, E. A., Palmer, A. R., Meddis, R. (eds.): The neurophysiological bases of auditory perception. Springer, New York, pp. 477-488.
11. Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winkler, I. (2013): Perceptual bistability in auditory streaming: How much do stimulus features matter? Learning and Perception, 5(Suppl. 2), 73-100. (this issue)
12. Denham, S. L., Winkler, I. (2006): The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 100, 154-170.
13. French-St. George, M., Bregman, A. S. (1989): Role of predictability of sequence in auditory stream segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 384-386.
14. Griffiths, T. D., Warren, J. D. (2004): What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 887-892.
15. Grimault, N., Bacon, S. P., Micheyl, C. (2002): Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1340-1348.
16. Haywood, N. R., Roberts, B. (2010): Build-up of the tendency to segregate auditory streams: Resetting effects evoked by a single deviant tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 3019-3031.
17. Hung, J., Jones, S. J., Vaz Pato, M. (2001): Scalp potentials to pitch change in rapid tone sequences - A correlate of sequential stream segregation. Experimental Brain Research, 140, 56-65.
18. Jones, M. R. (1976): Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83, 323-355.
19. Jones, M. R., Boltz, M. (1989): Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459-491.
20. Jones, M. R., Boltz, M., Kidd, G. (1982): Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 211-218.
21. Jones, M. R., Kidd, G., Wetzel, R. (1981): Evidence for rhythmic attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1059-1073.
22. Kondo, H. M., Kashino, M. (2009): Involvement of the thalamocortical loop in the spontaneous switching of percepts in auditory streaming. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 12695-12701.
23. Kubovy, M., Van Valkenburg, D. (2001): Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80, 97-126.
24. Moore, B. C. J., Gockel, H. (2002): Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 88, 320-333.
25. Moreno-Bote, R., Shpiro, A., Rinzel, J., Rubin, N. (2010): Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. Journal of Vision, 10, 1.1-18.
26. Müller, D., Widmann, A., Schröger, E. (2005): Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. Psychophysiology, 42, 668-676.
27. Pressnitzer, D., Hupé, J. M. (2006): Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology, 16, 1351-1357.
28. Rahne, T., Sussman, E. (2009): Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment. European Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 205-211.
29. Roberts, B., Glasberg, B. R., Moore, B. C. J. (2002): Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2074-2085.
30. Roberts, B., Glasberg, B. R., Moore, B. C. J. (2008): Effects of the build-up and resetting of auditory stream segregation on temporal discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance, 34, 992-1006.
31. Rogers, W. L., Bregman, A. S. (1993): An experimental evaluation of three theories of auditory stream segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 179-189.
32. Rogers, W. L., Bregman, A. S. (1998): Cumulation of the tendency to segregate auditory streams: Resetting by changes in location and loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1216-1227.
33. Schröger, E. (2007): Mismatch negativity: A microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 138-146.
34. Shinozaki, N., Yabe, H., Sato, Y., Sutoh, T., Hiruma, T., Nashida, T., Kaneko, S. (2000): Mismatch negativity (MMN) reveals sound grouping in the human brain. Neuroreport, 11, 1597-1601.
35. Snyder, J. S., Alain, C., Picton, T. W. (2006): Effects of attention on neuroelectric correlates of auditory stream segregation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1-13.
36. Snyder, J. S., Carter, O. L., Hannon, E. E., Alain, C. (2009a): Adaptation reveals multiple levels of representation in auditory stream segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1232-1244.
37. Snyder, J. S., Holder, W. T., Weintraub, D. M., Carter, O. L., Alain, C. (2009b): Effects of prior stimulus and prior perception on neural correlates of auditory stream segregation. Psychophysiology, 46, 1208-1215.
38. Sussman, E. (2005): Integration and segregation in auditory scene analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 1285-1298.
39. Sussman, E., Bregman, A. S., Wang, W. J., Khan, F. J. (2005): Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds within multistream auditory environments. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 93-110.
40. Sussman, E., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1998): Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Research, 789, 130-138.
41. Sussman, E., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1999): An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 36, 22-34.
42. Sussman, E., Steinschneider, M. (2006): Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex. Brain Research, 1075, 165-174.
43. Szalárdy, O., Bendixen, A., Tóth, D., Denham, S. L., Winkler, I. (2013): Modulation frequency acts as a primary cue for auditory stream segregation. Learning and Perception, 5(Suppl. 2), 149-161. (this issue)
44. Van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975): Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven.
45. Vliegen, J., Oxenham, A. J. (1999): Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 339-346.
46. Wertheimer, M. (1923): Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II [Laws of organization in perceptual forms II]. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350.
47. Winkler, I. (2007): Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147-163.
48. Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., Nelken, I. (2009): Modeling the auditory scene: Predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 532-540.
49. Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., Mill, R., Bo hm, T. M., Bendixen, A. (2012): Multistability in auditory stream segregation: A predictive coding view. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367, 1001-1012.
50. Winkler, I., Kushnerenko, E., Horváth, J., Ceponiene, R., Fellman, V., Huotilainen, M., Näätänen, R., Sussman, E. (2003a): Newborn infants can organize the auditory world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 11812-11815.
51. Winkler, I., Sussman, E., Tervaniemi, M., Horváth, J., Ritter, W., Näätänen, R. (2003b): Preattentive auditory context effects. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 57-77.
52. Winkler, I., Takegata, R., Sussman, E. (2005): Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 291-299.
53. Winkler, I., Van Zuijen, T. L., Sussman, E., Horváth, J., Näätänen, R. (2006): Object representation in the human auditory system. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 625-634.