Modulation-frequency acts as a primary cue for auditory stream segregation

Learning and Perception

Volumn 5, Issue , 2013, Pages 149-161

  Szalárdy, Orsolya ^a,b   Bendixen, Alexandra ^c,d   Tóth, Dénes ^a   Denham, Susan L ^e   Winkler, István ^a,f  

^a INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

^b BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Amplitude modulation; Auditory streaming; Perceptual bi stability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887407373     PISSN: 17893186     EISSN: 20609175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/LP.5.2013.Suppl2.9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anstis, S., Saida, S. (1985): Adaptation to Auditory Streaming of Frequency-Modulated Tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance, 11, 257-271.
2. Bendixen, A., Bohm, T. M., Szalárdy, O., Mill, R., Denham, S. L., Winkler, I. (2012): Different roles of similarity and predictability in auditory stream segregation. Learning and Perception, 4, 37-54.
3. Bendixen, A., Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Winkler, I. (2010): Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 3658-3666.
4. Blake, R., Logothetis, N. K. (2002): Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-23.
5. Bregman, A. S. (1990): Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Bregman, A. S., Abramson, J., Doehring, P., Darwin, C. J. (1985): Spectral integration based on common amplitude-modulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 483-493.
7. Ciocca, V. (2008): The auditory organization of complex sounds. Frontiers in Bioscience, 13, 148-169.
8. Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winkler, I. (2012): Perceptual bistability in auditory streaming: How much do stimulus features matter? Learning and Perception, 4, 73-96.
9. Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winkler, I. (2010): Stability of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming. In: Lopez-Poveda, E. A., Palmer, A. R., Meddis, R. (eds.): The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception. Springer, New York, pp. 477-487.
10. Denham, S. L., Winkler, I. (2006): The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 100, 154-70.
11. Dollezal, L. V., Beutelmann, R., Klump, G. M. (2012): Stream segregation in the perception of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Plos One, 7, e43615.
12. Du, Y., He, Y., Ross, B., Bardouille, T., Wu, X. H., Li, L. A., Alain, C. (2011): Human auditory cortex activity shows additive effects of spectral and spatial cues during speech segregation. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 698-707.
13. Griffiths, T. D., Warren, J. D. (2004): What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 887-892.
14. Grimault, N., Bacon, S. P., Micheyl, C. (2002): Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1340-1348.
15. Grimault, N., Micheyl, C., Carlyon, R. P., Arthaud, P., Collet, L. (2000): Influence of peripheral resolvability on the perceptual segregation of harmonic complex tones differing in fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 263-271.
16. Hartmann, W. M., Johnson, D. (1991): Stream segregation and peripheral channeling. Music Perception, 9, 155-184.
17. Leopold, D. A., Logothetis, N. K. (1999): Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254-264.
18. Moore, B. C. J., Gockel, H. (2002): Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 88, 320-333.
19. Moreno-Bote, R., Shpiro, A., Rinzel, J., Rubin, N. (2010): Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. Journal of Vision, 10, 1-18.
20. Pressnitzer, D., Hupe, J. M. (2006): Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology, 16, 1351-1357.
21. Rigby, R. A., Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005): Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Applied Statistics, 54, 507-554.
22. Roberts, B., Glasberg, B. R., Moore, B. C. J. (2002): Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2074-2085.
23. Schulze, H., Langner, G. (1997): Periodicity coding in the primary auditory cortex of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): two different coding strategies for pitch and rhythm? Journal of Comparative Physiology a-Neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology, 181, 651-663.
24. Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., Micheyl, C. (2011): Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends in Neurosciences, 34, 114-123.
25. Snyder, J. S., Alain, C. (2007): Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 780-799.
26. Therneau, T., Lumley, T. (2011): survival: Survival Analysis Including Penalised Likelihood. R package version 2.36-3, url: http://CRAN. R-project.org/package=survival.
27. van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975): Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven.
28. Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., Nelken, I. (2009): Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 532-540.