Object Shape and Orientation Do Not Routinely Influence Performance During Language Processing

Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2218-2225

  Rommers, Joost ^a,b   Meyer, Antje S ^a,c   Huettig, Falk ^a,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

language; psycholinguistics

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

LANGUAGE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887389043     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797613490746     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baayen R. H.,Davidson D. J.,Bates D. M.Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59:390-412.
2. Barsalou L. W.Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 1999;22:577-609.
3. Biederman I.,Cooper E. E.Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming.Perception. 1991;20:585-593.
4. Connell L.Representing object colour in language comprehension.Cognition. 2007;102:476-485.
5. Connell L.,Lynott D.Is a bear white in the woods? Parallel representation of implied object color during language comprehension.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2009;16:573-577.
6. Dahan D.,Tanenhaus M. K.Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2005;12:453-459.
7. Huettig F.,Altmann G. T. M.Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness.Visual Cognition. 2007;15:985-1018.
8. Huettig F.,McQueen J. M.The nature of the visual environment induces implicit biases during language-mediated visual search.Memory & Cognition. 2011;39:1068-1084.
9. Kang S. H. K.,Yap M. J.,Tse C. S.,Kurby C. A.Semantic size does not matter: "Bigger" words are not recognized faster.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2011;64:1041-1047.
10. Keller F.,Gunasekharan S.,Mayo N.,Corley M.Timing accuracy of Web experiments: A case study using the WebExp software package.Behavior Research Methods. 2009;41:1-12.
11. Kintsch W.Symbols and embodiment. De Vega M.Glenberg A.Graesser A., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2008:145-164.
12. Kosslyn S. M.Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994:.
13. Mahon B. Z.,Caramazza A.A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content.Journal of Physiology Paris. 2008;102:59-70.
14. Masson M. E. J.A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.Behavior Research Methods. 2011;43:679-690.
15. Pecher D.,van Dantzig S.,Schifferstein H. N. J.Concepts are not represented by imagery.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2009;16:914-919.
16. Pecher D.,van Dantzig S.,Zwaan R. A.,Zeelenberg R.Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2009;62:1108-1114.
17. Pecher D.,Zeelenberg R.,Barsalou L. W.Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs.Psychological Science. 2003;14:119-124.
18. Pecher D.,Zeelenberg R.,Raaijmakers J. G. W.Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation.Journal of Memory and Language. 1998;38:401-418.
19. Pulvermüller F.Brain mechanisms linking language and action.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2005;6:576-582.
20. Pylyshyn Z. W.The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge.Psychological Review. 1981;88:16-45.
21. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009:.
22. Raaijmakers J. G. W.,Schrijnemakers J. M. C.,Gremmen F.How to deal with "the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions.Journal of Memory and Language. 1999;41:416-426.
23. Raftery A. E.Sociological methodology 1995. Marsden P. V., ed. Cambridge, England: Blackwell; 1995:111-196.
24. Richardson D. C.,Spivey M. J.,Barsalou L. W.,McRae K.Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs.Cognitive Science. 2003;27:767-780.
25. Rommers J.,Meyer A. S.,Praamstra P.,Huettig F.The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: Activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to.Neuropsychologia. 2013;51:437-447.
26. Schreuder R.,Flores d'Arcais G. B.,Glazenborg G.Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming.Psychological Research. 1984;45:339-354.
27. Sereno S. C.,O'Donnell P. J.,Sereno M. E.Size matters: Bigger is faster.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2009;62:1115-1122.
28. Solomon K. O.,Barsalou L. W.Perceptual simulation in property verification.Memory & Cognition. 2004;32:244-259.
29. StanfieldR. A. (2000). The effects of verbal context on picture recognition. Unpublished master's thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
30. Stanfield R. A.,Zwaan R. A.The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition.Psychological Science. 2001;12:153-156.
31. van Dam W. O.,van Dijk M.,Bekkering H.,Rueschemeyer S.-A.Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations.Human Brain Mapping. 2012;33:2322-2333.
32. Wagenmakers E.-J.A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2007;14:779-804.
33. Wassenburg S. I.,Zwaan R. A.Readers routinely represent implied object rotation: The role of visual experience.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2010;63:1665-1670.
34. Zwaan R. A.The psychology of learning and motivation. Ross B. H., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2004:35-62.
35. ZwaanR. A.PecherD. (2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: Six replication attempts. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51382. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051382.
36. Zwaan R. A.,Stanfield R. A.,Yaxley R. H.Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects.Psychological Science. 2002;13:168-171.