Effects of Conversation Partners' Gender-Language Consistency on References to Emotion, Tentative Language, and Gender Salience

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 433-451

  Ye, Zhenzhen ^a   Palomares, Nicholas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

accommodation; CMC; email; gender based language; social interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887370815     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: 15526526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X13494832     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aries E.Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996:.
2. Bakeman R.,Gottman J. M.Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1986:.
3. Cargile A. C.,Bradac J. J.Communication yearbook 25. Gudykunst W. B., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001:347-382.
4. Carli L.Gender, language, and influence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;59:941-951.
5. Coupland N.,Coupland J.,Giles H.,Henwood K.Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory.Language in Society. 1988;17:1-41.
6. Dragojevic M.,Gasiorek J.,Giles H.International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication. Berger C. R.Roloff M., ed. New York, NY: Wiley; in press:.
7. Fitzpatrick M. A.,Mulac A.,Dindia K.Gender-preferential language use in spouse and stranger interaction.Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1995;14:18-39.
8. Gallois C.,Ogay T.,Giles H.Theorizing about intercultural communication. Gundykunst W., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:121-148.
9. Giles H.,Willemyns M.,Gallois C.,Anderson M. C.Social communication. Fiedler K., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2007:129-162.
10. Hannah A.,Murachver T.Gender preferential responses to speech.Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 2007;26:274-190.
11. Hogg M. A.Masculine and feminine speech in dyads and groups: A study of speech style and gender salience.Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1985;4:99-112.
12. Hyde J. S.The gender similarities hypothesis.American Psychologist. 2005;60:581-592.
13. Hyde J. S.Sex differences and similarities in communication. 2006). Epilogue. In DindiaK.CanaryD. J. (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (2nd ed., pp. 413-418). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Dindia K.Canary D. J., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006:413-418.
14. Lakoff R.Language and women's place. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1975:.
15. Leaper C.,Ayres M. M.A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults' language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2007;11:328-363.
16. Mulac A.Sex differences and similarities in communication. 2006). The gender-linked language effect: Do language differences really make a difference? In DindiaK.CanaryD. J. (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (2nd ed., pp. 219-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Dindia K.Canary D. J., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006:219-239.
17. Mulac A.,Bradac J. J.,Gibbons P.Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences.Human Communication Research. 2001;27:121-152.
18. Mulac A.,Lundell T. L.Effects of gender-linked language differences in adult's written discourse: Multivariate tests of language effects.Language and Communication. 1994;14:299-309.
19. Ng S.,Bradac J. J.Power in language: Verbal communication and social influence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1993:.
20. Palomares N. A.Gender schematicity, gender identity salience, and gender-linked language use.Human Communication Research. 2004;30:556-588.
21. Palomares N. A.Explaining gender-based language use: Effects of gender identity salience on references to emotion and tentative language in intra- and intergroup contexts.Human Communication Research. 2008;34:263-286.
22. Palomares N. A.Women are sort of more tentative than men, aren't they? How men and women use tentative language differently, similarly, and counter-stereotypically as a function of gender salience.Communication Research. 2009;36:538-560.
23. Palomares N. A.The interrelationship of business and communication. Hinner M. B., ed. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang; 2010:135-148.
24. Palomares N. A.The handbook of intergroup communication. Giles H., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012:197-210.
25. Palomares N. A.,Reid S. A.,Bradac J. J.Language matters: Communication, identity, and culture. Ng S. H.Candlin C. N.Chiu C. Y., ed. Hong Kong: City University Press; 2004:85-109.
26. Reid S. A.,Keerie N.,Palomares N. A.Language, gender salience, and social influence.Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 2003;22:210-233.
27. Reid S. A.,Palomares N. A.,Anderson G. L.,Bondad-Brown B.Gender, language, and social influence: A test of expectation states, role congruity, and self-categorization theories.Human Communication Research. 2009;35:465-490.
28. Robertson K.,Murachver T.Children's speech accommodation to gendered language styles.Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 2003;22:321-333.
29. Shepard C. A.,Giles H.,Le Poire B. A.The new handbook of language and social psychology. Robinson W. P.Giles H., ed. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2001:33-56.
30. Thomson R.,Murachver T.,Green J.Where is gender in gendered language?.Psychological Science. 2001;12:171-175.