Spatial inference machines

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2985-2992

  Shapovalov, Roman ^a   Vetrov, Dmitry ^a   Kohli, Pushmeet ^b  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D point clouds; computer vision; depth images; inference machines; scene understanding; semantic segmentation

Indexed keywords

3D POINT CLOUD; DEPTH IMAGE; INFERENCE MACHINE; SCENE UNDERSTANDING; SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION;

COMPUTER VISION; SEMANTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 84887355850     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.384     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5-32, 2001. 3, 6
2. E. Brill. A simple rule-based part of speech tagger. In ACL, pages 112-116, Trento, IT, 1992. 1
3. C. Desai, D. Ramanan, and C. Fowlkes. Discriminative models for multi-class object layout. In ICCV, pages 229-236, 2009. 2, 5
4. J. Domke. Parameter Learning with Truncated Message-Passing. In CVPR, number x, pages 2937-2944, Colorado Springs, CO, 2011. 2
5. B. Fulkerson, A. Vedaldi, and S. Soatto. Class segmentation and object localization with superpixel neighborhoods. In ICCV, pages 670-677, 2009. 1
6. G. Heitz and D. Koller. Learning spatial context: Using stuff to find things. In ECCV, pages 30-43, Marseille, France, 2008. 2, 5
7. P. Kohli, L. Ladický, and P. H. S. Torr. Robust Higher Order Potentials for Enforcing Label Consistency. IJCV, 82(3):302-324, Jan. 2009. 1
8. H. S. Koppula, A. Anand, T. Joachims, and A. Saxena. Semantic Labeling of 3D Point Clouds for Indoor Scenes. In NIPS, Granada, ES, 2011. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8
9. P. Krähenbühl and V. Koltun. Efficient inference in fully connected crfs with gaussian edge potentials. In NIPS, 2011. 1
10. A. Montillo, J. Shotton, J. M. Winn, J. E. Iglesias, D. N. Metaxas, and A. Criminisi. Entangled decision forests and their application for semantic segmentation of ct images. In IPMI, 2011. 1
11. D. Munoz, J. A. Bagnell, and M. Hebert. Stacked hierarchical labeling. In ECCV, Heraklion, Grece, 2010. 1, 4
12. D. Munoz, J. A. Bagnell, N. Vandapel, and M. Hebert. Contextual classification with functional Max-Margin Markov Networks. In CVPR, pages 975-982, Miami, FL, June 2009. 1, 2
13. S. Nowozin and C. H. Lampert. Global connectivity potentials for random field models. In CVPR, pages 818-825, June 2009. 1
14. A. Rabinovich, A. Vedaldi, C. Galleguillos, E. Wiewiora, and S. Belongie. Objects in Context. In ICCV, 2007. 2
15. S. Ross, D. Munoz, M. Hebert, and J. A. Bagnell. Learning Message-Passing Inference Machines for Structured Prediction. In CVPR, pages 2737-2744, Colorado Springs, CO, 2011. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
16. R. Shapovalov and A. Velizhev. Cutting-Plane Training of Nonassociative Markov Network for 3D Point Cloud Segmentation. In 3DIMPVT, pages 1-8, Hangzhou, China, 2011. 2
17. J. Shotton, M. Johnson, and R. Cipolla. Semantic texton forests for image categorization and segmentation. In CVPR, June 2008. 1, 2
18. R. Szeliski, R. Zabih, D. Scharstein, O. Veksler, V. Kolmogorov, A. Agarwala, M. Tappen, and C. Rother. A comparative study of energy minimization methods for Markov random fields. LNCS, 3952(6):16-29, 2006. 1
19. Z. Tu. Auto-context and its application to high-level vision tasks. In CVPR, Anchorage, AL, June 2008. 1, 2
20. O. J. Woodford, C. Rother, and V. Kolmogorov. A global perspective on MAP inference for low-level vision. In ICCV, number Iccv, pages 2319-2326. ICCV, 2009. 1
21. X. Xiong, D. Munoz, J. A. Bagnell, and M. Hebert. 3-D Scene Analysis via Sequenced Predictions over Points and Regions. In ICRA, Shanghai, China, 2011. 1