Young women's experience with using videoconferencing for the assessment of sexual behavior and microbicide use

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 866-871

  Mabragaña, Marina ^a   Carballo Diéguez, Alex ^a   Giguere, Rebecca ^a  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Interview; Microbicide; Qualitative research; Sexual behavior; videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DATA COLLECTION TOOLS; DEGREE OF SATISFACTION; FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES; INTERVIEW; MICROBICIDE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEXUAL BEHAVIORS;

DATA ACQUISITION; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH; TOOLS; VIDEO CONFERENCING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; ASTODRIMER; DENDRIMER; POLYLYSINE;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GEL; HUMAN; INTRAVAGINAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL; PUERTO RICO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES; VIDEOCONFERENCING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL; ADOLESCENT; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; DENDRIMERS; FEMALE; GELS; HUMANS; POLYLYSINE; PUERTO RICO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES; VIDEOCONFERENCING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887325155     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0008     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Richardson LK, Christopher Frueh B, Grubaugh AL, Egede L, Elhai JD. Current directions in videoconferencing tele-mental health research. Clin Psychol (New York) 2009;16:323-338
2. Frueh BC. Procedural and methodological issues in telepsychiatry research and program development. Psychiatr Serv 2000;51:1522-1527
3. Angaran D. Telemedicine and telepharmacy: Current status and future implications. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999;56:1405-1426
4. Laitinen J, Korkiakangas E, Alahuhta M, et al. Feasibility of videoconferencing in lifestyle group counselling. Int J Circumpolar Health 2010;69:500-511
5. Bernard M-M, Janson F, Flora PK, et al. Videoconference-based physiotherapy and tele-assessment for homebound older adults: A pilot study. Activ Adapt Aging 2009;33:39-48
6. Russell T, Truter P, Blumke R, Richardson B. The diagnostic accuracy of telerehabilitation for nonarticular lower-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:585-594
7. O'Malley C, Langton S, Anderson A, Doherty-Sneddon G, Bruce V. Comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated interaction. Interact Comput 1996;8:177-192
8. Sorlie T, Gammon D, Bergvik S, Sexton H. Psychotherapy supervision face-toface and by video conferencing: A comparative study. Br J Psychother 1999;15:452-462
9. Pauleen DJ, Yoong P. Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels. Internet Res 2001;11:190-202
10. Motamedi V. A critical look at the use of videoconferencing in United States distance education. Education 2001;122:386-394
11. Yellowlees P, Shore J, Roberts L. Practice guidelines for videoconferencingbased telemental health-October 2009. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:1074-1089
12. Sedgwick M, Spiers J. The use of videoconferencing as a medium for the qualitative interview. Int J Qual Methods 2009;8:1-11
13. King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2010
14. Dobscha SK, Corson K, Solodky J, Gerrity MS. Use of videoconferencing for depression research: Enrollment, retention, and patient satisfaction. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:84-89
15. Dijkstra W. How interviewer variance can bias the results of research on interviewer effects. Qual Quant 1983;17:179-187
16. Lavrakas PJ. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2008
17. Biemer PP, Lyberg L. Introduction to survey quality. New York: john Wiley and Sons, 2003
18. Hewson C. Gathering data on the Internet: Qualitative approaches and possibilities for mixed methods research. In: joinson AN, McKenna KYA, Postmes T, Reips UD, eds. The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007:405-428
19. Chapman DS, Rowe PM. The influence of videoconference technology and interview structure on the recruiting function of the employment interview: A field experiment. Int J Select Assess 2002;10:185-197
20. Tang JC, Isaacs E. Why do users like video? Comput Support Coop Work 1992;1:163-196
21. Sellen AJ. Remote conversations: The effects of mediating talk with technology. Hum Comput Interact 1995;10:401-444
22. Joinson AN. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. Eur J Soc Psychol 2001;31:177-192
23. Opdenakker R. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qual Soc Res 2006;7(4):11
24. Mari'n G, Mari'n BV. A comparison of three interviewing approaches for studying sensitive topics with Hispanics. Hisp J Behav Sci 1989;11:330-340
25. Galesic M, Tourangeau R, Couper MP. Complementing random-digit-dial telephone surveys with other approaches to collecting sensitive data. Am J Prev Med 2006;31:437-443
26. Tourangeau R, Smith TW. Asking sensitive questions. The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opin Q 1996;60:275-304
27. Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health 2008;31:391-398
28. Mensch BS, Hewett PC, Erulkar A. The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: A methodological experiment in Kenya. Demography 2003;40:247-268
29. Jaya, Hindin MJ, Ahmed S. Differences in young people's reports of sexual behaviors according to interview methodology: A randomized trial in India. Am J Public Health 2008;98:169-174
30. Lee RM. Doing research on sensitive topics. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 1993
31. Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2007
32. Moss CM, Shank G. Using qualitative processes in computer technology research on online learning: Lessons in change from ''teaching as intentional learning.'' Forum Qual Soc Res 2002;3(2). Available at http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0202218 (last accessed September 12, 2013).
33. Chapman DS, Rowe PM. The impact of videoconference technology, interview structure, and interviewer gender on interviewer evaluations in the employment interview: A field experiment. J Occup Organ Psychol 2001;1;74:279-298
34. Matthews J, Cramer EP. Using technology to enhance qualitative research with hidden populations. Qual Rep 2008;13:301-315
35. Mann C, Stewart F. Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2000
36. McGowan I, Gomez K, Bruder K, et al. Phase 1 randomized trial of the vaginal safety and acceptability of SPL7013 gel (VivaGel) in sexually active young women (MTN-004). AIDS 2011;25:1057-1064
37. Carballo-Die'guez A, Giguere R, Dolezal C, et al. ''Tell Juliana'': Acceptability of the candidate microbicide VivaGel- and two placebo gels among ethnically diverse, sexually active young women participating in a phase 1 microbicide study. AIDS Behav 2012;16:1761-1774
38. Giguere R, Carballo-Die'guez A, Ventuneac A, et al. Variations in microbicide gel acceptability among young women in the USA and Puerto Rico. Cult Health Sex 2011;14:151-166