Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 23, 2013, Pages

  Maruo, Keishi ^a,b   Ha, Yoon ^c   Inoue, Shinichi ^a,b   Samuel, Sumant ^d   Okada, Eijiro ^e   Hu, Serena S ^a   Deviren, Vedat ^a   Burch, Shane ^a   William, Schairer ^a   Ames, Christopher P ^a   Mummaneni, Praveen V ^a   Chou, Dean ^a   Berven, Sigurd H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HYOGO COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^e SAISEIKAI CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

adult spinal deformity; complication; fusions to the sacrum; long fusion surgery; proximal junctional kyphosis; vertebral fracture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INCIDENCE; KYPHOSCOLIOSIS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SACRUM; SPINE FRACTURE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE STABILIZATION; VERTEBRA DISLOCATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SACRUM; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84887322246     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a51d43     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 2024-9.
2. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society- Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 1077-82.
3. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, et al. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1828-33.
4. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al. Adult spinal deformitypostoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 2224-31.
5. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E599-606.
6. Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, et al. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16: 547-64.
7. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 682-8.
8. Berven SH, Deviren V, Smith JA, et al. Management of fixed sagittal plane deformity: outcome of combined anterior and posterior surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 1710-5; discussion 6.
9. Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK, et al. Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28: E3.
10. Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Cheh G, et al. Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2238-44.
11. Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, et al. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2171-8.
12. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, et al. Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 817-24.
13. Cloyd JM, Acosta FL, Jr, Cloyd C, et al. Effects of age on perioperative complications of extensive multilevel thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 402-8.
14. Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E60-8.
15. Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 1479-89.
16. Mendoza-Lattes S, Ries Z, Gao Y, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult reconstructive spine surgery results from incomplete restoration of the lumbar lordosis relative to the magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis. Iowa Orthop J 2011; 31: 199-206.
17. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 2179-84.
18. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1643-9.
19. Kim HJ, Yagi M, Nyugen J, et al. Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 1633-9.
20. Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: S144-64.
21. Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Proximal junctional vertebral fracture in adults after spinal deformity surgery using pedicle screw constructs: analysis of morphological features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 138-45.
22. Lewis SJ, Abbas H, Chua S, et al. Upper instrumented veterbra (UIV) fractures in long lumbar fusions: what are the associated risk factors? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 1407-14.
23. Kim JH, Kim SS, Suk SI. Incidence of proximal adjacent failure in adult lumbar deformity correction based on proximal fusion level. Asian Spine J 2007; 1: 19-26.
24. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 2359-66.
25. Lafage V, Ames C, Schwab F, et al. Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: E180-7.
26. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, et al. Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36" radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 427-33.
27. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998; 7: 99-103.
28. Rajpal S, Resnick DK. Rod cantilever techniques. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 157-62.
29. Cahill PJ, Wang W, Asghar J, et al. The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: E687-95.
30. Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH, 3rd, et al. Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 795-9.