Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: A comprehensive radiographic analysis

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Lafage, Virginie ^a   Ames, Christopher ^d   Schwab, Frank ^a   Klineberg, Eric ^b   Akbarnia, Behrooz ^c   Smith, Justin ⁱ   Boachie Adjei, Oheneba ^e   Burton, Douglas ^f   Hart, Robert ^g   Hostin, Richard ^h   Shaffrey, Christopher ⁱ   Wood, Kirkham ^j   Bess, Shay ^k  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR SPINAL DISORDERS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h Baylor Scoliosis Center   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^j MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

junctional failure; pelvic tilt; PSO; sagittal imbalance; selective fusion; spinopelvic alignment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR LORDOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; OSTEOTOMY; PARAMETERS; PEDICLE SUBTRACTION OSTEOTOMY; PELVIC INCIDENCE; PELVIC TILT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SAGITTAL VERTICAL AXIS; SPINE FUSION; T1 SPINOPELVIC INCLINATION; THORACIC KYPHOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856737153     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318225b926     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 2024-9. (Pubitemid 41363744)
2. Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, et al. Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2186-90.
3. Schwab F, Dubey A, Pagala M, et al. Adult scoliosis: a health assessment analysis by SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 602-6. (Pubitemid 36343751)
4. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, et al. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery 2009; 65: 86-93; discussion 93-4.
5. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year followup. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1693-8.
6. Schwab F, Farcy JP, Bridwell K, et al. A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 2109-14.
7. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 682-8. (Pubitemid 40388653)
8. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E599-606.
9. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, et al. Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 47-55.
10. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 1712-20. (Pubitemid 29387928)
11. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Edwards C, et al. Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 2093-101. (Pubitemid 37140198)
12. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A: 454-63. (Pubitemid 36538751)
13. Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2245-52. (Pubitemid 47415108)
14. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2189-97. (Pubitemid 47415100)
15. Mummaneni PV, Dhall SS, Ondra SL, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 171-6.
16. Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 785-91.
17. Yang BP, Ondra SL, Chen LA, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 5: 9-17. (Pubitemid 47325409)
18. Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH, et al. Influence of lumbar lordosis restoration on thoracic curve and sagittal position in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 280-4.
19. Newton PO, Yaszay B, Upasani VV, et al. Preservation of thoracic kyphosis is critical to maintain lumbar lordosis in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 1365-70.
20. Chiffolot X, Lemaire JP, Bogorin I, et al. Pedicle closing-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2006; 92: 257-65. (Pubitemid 43828063)
21. Gill JB, Levin A, Burd T, et al. Corrective osteotomies in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2509-20.
22. Heary RF, Bono CM. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the treatment of chronic, posttraumatic kyphotic deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 5: 1-8. (Pubitemid 47325408)
23. Ikenaga M, Shikata J, Takemoto M, et al. Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 330-6. (Pubitemid 47066091)
24. Murrey DB, Brigham CD, Kiebzak GM, et al. Transpedicular decompression and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (eggshell procedure): a retrospective review of 59 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 2338-45. (Pubitemid 35266219)
25. van Loon PJ, van Stralen G, van Loon CJ, et al. A pedicle subtraction osteotomy as an adjunctive tool in the surgical treatment of a rigid thoracolumbar hyperkyphosis; a preliminary report. Spine J 2006; 6: 195-200.
26. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, et al. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1828-33.
27. Aurouer N, Obeid I, Gille O, et al. Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine [published online ahead of print July 14, 2009]. Surg Radiol Anat.
28. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, et al. Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36" radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 427-33. (Pubitemid 40262156)
29. Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P, et al. Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2003; 89: 218-27. (Pubitemid 36626613)
30. Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A, et al. Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 982-91. (Pubitemid 43873789)
31. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 2359-66. (Pubitemid 44423536)
32. Hyun SJ, Rhim SC. Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients: a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010; 47: 95-101.
33. Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Smith JS, et al. PSO Failures Can Be Predicted by High Pre-Op SVA and Pelvic Tilt. Salt Lake City, UT: Scoliosis Research Society; 2009.
34. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Risk factors of sagittal decompensation after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 1595-601.
35. Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, et al. Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: E959-67. (Pubitemid 44885699)
36. Gottfried ON, Daubs MD, Patel AA, et al. Spinopelvic parameters in postfusion flatback deformity patients. Spine J 2009; 9: 639-47.
37. Husson JL, Mallet JF, Parent H, et al. The lumbar-pelvic-femoralcomplex: applications in spinal imbalance. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96S: 1-9.
38. Kallman DA, Plato CC, Tobin JD. The role of muscle loss in the age-related decline of grip strength: cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. J Gerontol 1990; 45: M82-8. (Pubitemid 20171148)
39. Balogun JA, Akindele KA, Nihinlola JO, et al. Age-related changes in balance performance. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16: 58-62. (Pubitemid 24156045)
40. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Arthrodesis to L5 versus S1 in long instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 531-7.
41. Swamy G, Berven SH, Bradford DS. The selection of L5 versus S1 in long fusions for adult idiopathic scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2007; 18: 281-8. (Pubitemid 46860339)
42. Bridwell KH. Where to stop the fusion distally in adult scoliosis: L4, L5, or the sacrum? Instr Course Lect 1996; 45: 101-7.
43. Cho KJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis: the sagittal stable vertebra concept. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 765-70.
44. Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, et al. Complications and results of long adult deformity fusions down to l4, l5, and the sacrum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: E182-92.
45. Bridwell KH, Edwards CC II, Lenke LG. The pros and cons to saving the L5-S1 motion segment in a long scoliosis fusion construct. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: S234-42. (Pubitemid 37266731)
46. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2653-61. (Pubitemid 350135375)