An experiment to evaluate how to better present user models to the users

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 462, Issue , 2009, Pages 21-33

  Vernero, Fabiana ^a   Petromilli, Alessandra ^a   Cena, Federica ^a   Gena, Cristina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION DECISIONS; CULTURAL EVENTS; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; ON-LINE EVALUATION; SOCIAL RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; USER MODELING; USER MODELS; WEB APPLICATION;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTS; VISUALIZATION;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 84887216567     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. S. Bull and Kay J. A framework for designing and analysing open learner modelling. In Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, 2005.
2. S. Bull, M. Mangat, A. Mabbott, A. S. Abu Issa, and J. Marsh. Reactions to inspectable learner models: Seven year olds to university students. In Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, AIED, pages 1-10, 2005.
3. S. Bull and M. Mckay. An open learner model for children and teachers: Inspecting knowledge. In Level of Individuals and Peers, Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 7th Int. Conf, pages 646-655. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
4. S. Bull and H. Pain. Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me? Inspecting and questioning the student model. In Proceedings of AI in Education, AACE, pages 501-508, 1995.
5. F. Carmagnola, F. Cena, L. Console, O. Cortassa, C. Gena, A. Goy, I. Torre, A. Toso, and F. Vernero. Tag-based user modeling for social multi-device adaptive guides. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., 18(5):497-538, 2008.
6. H. S. M. Cramer, V. Evers, S. Ramlal, M. van Someren, L. Rutledge, N. Stash, L. Aroyo, and B. J. Wielinga. The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., 18(5):455-496, 2008.
7. V. Dimitrova. Style-olm: Interactive open learner modelling. International Journal of AI in Education, 13(1):35-78, 2003.
8. Kay J. Learner know thyself: Student models to give learner control and responsibility. In AACE, International Conference on Computers in Education, pages 17-24, 1997.
9. J. Kay. A scrutable user modelling shell for user-adapted interaction. PhD thesis, Basser Department of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 1999.
10. J. Kay. Scrutable adaptation: Because we can and must. In AH, pages 11-19, 2006.
11. J. Kay, R. J. Kummerfeld, and P. Lauder. Personis: a server for user models. In AH'2002, Adaptive Hypertext 2002. AH'2002, Adaptive Hypertext 2002, 2002.
12. L. Li and J. Kay. Assess: promoting learner reflection in student self-assessment. In Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modeling for Reflection, to Support Learner Control. Metacognition and Improved Communication, pages 32-41, 2005.
13. S. Mohanarajah, R. Kemp, and E. Kemp. Opening a fuzzy learner model. In Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, AIED, page 6271, 2005.
14. D. Norman. The Design of Future Things. New York: Basic Books, 2007.
15. K. A. Papanikolaou, M. Grigoriadou, H. Kornilakis, and G. D. Magoulas. Inspire: an intelligent system for personalized instruction in a remote environment. In In Proceedings of 3 rd Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, pages 13-24, 2001.
16. Singleton A. Royce and Bruce C. Straits. Approaches to Social Research (3rd Edition). New York: Oxford University Press., 1999.
17. G. Weber and P. Brusilovsky. Elm-art: An adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction. International Journal of AI in Education, 12(4):351-384, 2001.
18. J. D. Zapata-Rivera and J. Greer. Construction and inspection of learner models. In Computer Support For Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002, pages 495-497, 2002.
19. J. D. Zapata-Rivera, J. S. Underwood, and M. Bauer. Advanced reporting systems in assessment environments. In Proceedings ofWorkshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, AIED, pages 23-32, 2005.