Oxytocin administration during labor. Results from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey;Administration d'ocytocine au cours du travail en France. Résultats de l'enquête nationale périnatale 2010

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 662-670

  Belghiti, J ^a,b   Coulm, B ^a,b   Kayem, G ^a,c   Blondel, B ^a,b   Deneux Tharaux, C ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Augmentation of labor; Management of labor; Obstetrics; Oxytocin administration

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; LABOR; LABOR ONSET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; OBESITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADMINISTRATION D'OCYTOCINE; AUGMENTATION OF LABOR; CONDUITE DU TRAVAIL; MANAGEMENT OF LABOR; OBSTETRICS; OBSTÉTRIQUE; OXYTOCIN ADMINISTRATION; STIMULATION DU TRAVAIL;

ADULT; FEMALE; FRANCE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; LOGISTIC MODELS; OVERWEIGHT; OXYTOCICS; OXYTOCIN; PARITY; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84887196389     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: 17730430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49 Dystocia and augmentation of labor Obstet Gynecol 102 2003 1445 1454
2. NICE 2008. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Intrapartum care: management and delivery of care to women in labour. 2008. Disponible sur: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG55.
3. D. Cabrol, B. Carbonne, P. Lucidarme, and C. Rouxel Dystocie dynamique Encycl Med Chir 1997 9 [5-064-A-10]
4. C. Le Ray, M. Carayol, J. Zeitlin, G. Bréart, and F. Goffinet Level of perinatal care of the maternity unit and rate of cesarean in low-risk nulliparas Obstet Gynecol 107 2006 1269 1277
5. G.J. Bugg, F. Siddiqui, and J.G. Thornton Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7 2011 CD007123
6. J. Belghiti, G. Kayem, C. Dupont, R.C. Rudigoz, M.H. Bouvier-Colle, and C. Deneux-Tharaux Oxytocin during labour and risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage: a population-based, cohort-nested case-control study BMJ Open 1 2011 e000514
7. A.J. Satin, K.J. Leveno, M.L. Sherman, D.S. Brewster, and F.G. Cunningham High- versus low-dose oxytocin for labor stimulation Obstet Gynecol 80 1992 111 116
8. HAS. Déclenchement artificiel du travail à partir de 37 semaines d'aménorrhée. 2008. Disponible sur: www.has-sante.fr.
9. B. Blondel, N. Lelong, M. Kermarrec, and F. Goffinet La santé périnatale en France métropolitaine de 1995 à 2010. Résultats des enquêtes nationales périnatales J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41 2011 151 166
10. C. Le Ray, F. Goffinet, M. Palot, M. Garel, and B. Blondel Factors associated with the choice of delivery without epidural analgesia in women at low risk in France Birth 35 2008 171 178
11. Blondel B, Kermarrec M. Enquête Nationale Périnatale 2010, les naissances en 2010 et leur évolution depuis 2003. 2011. Disponible sur: http://www.drees.sante.gouv.fr.
12. M. Knight, J.J. Kurinczuk, P. Spark, and P. Brocklehurst Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy Obstet Gynecol 111 2008 97 105
13. J.J. Zwart, J.M. Richters, F. Ory, J.I.P. De Vries, K.W.M. Bloemenkamp, and J. Van Roosmalen Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study BJOG 116 2009 1069 1078
14. M.E. Oscarsson, I. Amer-Wåhlin, H. Rydhstroem, and K. Källén Outcome in obstetric care related to oxytocin use. A population-based study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85 2006 1094 1098
15. L. Selin, E. Almström, G. Wallin, and M. Berg Use and abuse of oxytocin for augmentation of labor Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88 2009 1352 1357
16. A.M. Hilliard, S.P. Chauhan, Y. Zhao, and N.C. Rankins Effect of obesity on length of labor in nulliparous women Am J Perinatol 29 2012 127 132
17. T. Bergholt, L.K. Lim, J.S. Jørgensen, and M.S. Robson Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 196 2007 163e1 163e5
18. B. Coulm, C. Le Ray, N. Lelong, N. Drewniak, J. Zeitlin, and B. Blondel Obstetric interventions for low-risk pregnant women in France: do maternity unit characteristics make a difference? Birth 39 2012 183 191
19. B. Blondel Medical responsibility of midwives in public and private maternity units. Results of a survey of 11 French regions J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 27 1998 692 701
20. M. Pel, M.H. Heres, A.A. Hart, F. Van der Veen, and P.E. Treffers Provider-associated factors in obstetric interventions Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 61 1995 129 134
21. B. Reime, M.C. Klein, A. Kelly, N. Duxbury, L. Saxell, and R. Liston Do maternity care provider groups have different attitudes towards birth? BJOG 111 2004 1388 1393
22. K.E. Fitzpatrick, J.J. Kurinczuk, Z. Alfirevic, P. Spark, P. Brocklehurst, and M. Knight Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study PLoS Med 9 2012 e1001184
23. M.B. Landon, J.C. Hauth, K.J. Leveno, C.Y. Spong, S. Leindecker, and M.W. Varner Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery N Engl J Med 351 2004 2581 2589
24. P. Deruelle, J. Lepage, S. Depret, and E. Clouqueur Mode de déclenchement du travail et conduite du travail en cas d'utérus cicatriciel J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 41 2012 788 802