Predictive Validity and the Impact of Change in Total LSI-R Score on Recidivism

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1383-1396

  Vose, Brenda ^a   Smith, Paula ^b   Cullen, Francis T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

LSI R; offender assessment; offender classification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887181941     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854813508916     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.LSI-R the Level of Service Inventory-Revised user's manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems; 1995:.
2. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.The psychology of criminal conduct. 1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Cincinnati, OH: Anderson; 1998:.
3. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.,Wormith J. S.The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment.Crime & Delinquency. 2006;52:7-27.
4. Andrews D. A.,Zinger I.,Hoge R. D.,Bonta J.,Gendreau P.,Cullen F. T.Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically-informed meta-analysis.Criminology. 1990;28:369-404.
5. Barnoski R.,Aos S.Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2003:.
6. Cohen R. L.Probation and parole violators in state prison, 1991. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 1995:.
7. Cullen F. T.,Gendreau P.Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system: Criminal justice 2000. Horney J., ed. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2000:109-175.
8. Cullen F. T.,Gilbert K. E.Reaffirming rehabilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson; 1982:.
9. Cullen F. T.,Myer A. J.,Latessa E. J.Eight lessons learned from moneyball: The high cost of ignoring evidence-based corrections.Victims & Offenders. 2009;4:197-213.
10. Cummings G.,Finch S.Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.American Psychologist. 2005;60:170-180.
11. Dowdy E. R.,Lacy M. G.,Unnithan N. P.Correctional prediction and the Level of Supervision Inventory.Journal of Criminal Justice. 2002;30:29-39.
12. Feeley M. M.,Simon J.The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications.Criminology. 1992;30:449-474.
13. Gendreau P.Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply. Harland A. T., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1996:117-130.
14. Gendreau P.,Goggin C. E.,Law M. A.Predicting prison misconducts.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 1997;24:414-431.
15. Gendreau P.,Goggin C. E.,Smith P.Is the PCL-R really the "unparalleled" measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2002;29:397-426.
16. Gendreau P.,Little T.,Goggin C. E.A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!.Criminology. 1996;34:575-607.
17. Gendreau P.,Ross R. R.Effective correctional treatment: Bibliotherapy for cynics.Crime & Delinquency. 1979;25:463-489.
18. Gendreau P.,Smith P.,French S. A.Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. Cullen F. T.Wright J. P.Blevins K. R., ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 2006:419-446.
19. Glaze L. E.,Bonczar T. P.Probation and parole in the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 2011:.
20. Hendricks B.,Werner T.,Shipway L.Recidivism among spousal abusers: Predictions and program evaluations.Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2006;21:703-716.
21. Hirschi T.,Gottfredson M. R.Age and the explanation of crime.American Journal of Sociology. 1983;89:552-584.
22. Hollin C. R.,Palmer E. J.,Clark D.The Level of Service Inventory-Revised profile of English prisoners: A needs analysis.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2003;30:422-440.
23. Holsinger A. M.,Lowenkamp C. T.,Latessa E. J.Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised with Native American offenders.Journal of Criminal Justice. 2006;34:331-337.
24. Holtfreter K.,Reisig M. D.,Morash M.Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders.Criminology & Public Policy. 2004;3:185-208.
25. Hsu C. I.,Caputi P.,Byrne M. K.The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R): A useful risk assessment measure for Australian offenders?.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2009;36:728-740.
26. Hubbard D. J.Getting the most out of correctional treatment: Testing the responsivity principle on male and female offenders.Federal Probation. 2007;71 (1): 2-8.
27. Latessa E. J.,Cullen F. T.,Gendreau P.Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment.Federal Probation. 2002;66 (2): 43-49.
28. Lipsey M. W.Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. Cook T. D.Cooper H.Corday D. S.Hartmann H.Hedges L. V.Light R. J.Lewis A.Mosteller F., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1992:83-127.
29. Losel F.What works: Reducing reoffending. McGuire J., ed. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1995:77-111.
30. Lowenkamp C. T.,Bechtel K.The predictive validity of the LSI-R on a sample of offenders drawn from the records of the Iowa Department of Corrections data management system.Federal Probation. 2007;71 (3): 25-29.
31. Lowenkamp C. T.,Lovins B.,Latessa E. J.Validating the Level of Service Inventory-Revised and the Level of Service Inventory: Screening version with a sample of probationers.The Prison Journal. 2009;89:192-204.
32. MacKenzie D. L.Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works.Crime & Delinquency. 2000;46:457-471.
33. Manchak S. M.,Skeem J. L.,Douglas K. S.Utility of the revised Level of Service Inventory (LSI-R) in predicting recidivism after long-term incarceration.Law and Human Behavior. 2008;32:477-488.
34. Marczyk G. R.,Heilbrum K.,Lander T.,DeMatteo D.Predicting juvenile recidivism with the PCL:YV, MAYSI, and YLS/CMI.International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 2003;2:7-18.
35. Marlowe D. B.,Festinger D. S.,Lee P. A.,Dugosh K. L.,Benasutti K. M.Matching judicial supervision to clients' risk status in drug court.Crime & Delinquency. 2006;52:52-76.
36. Miles H.,Raynor P.Community sentences in Jersey: Risk, need and rehabilitation. St. Helier, UK: Jersey Probation and After Care Service; 2004:.
37. Mills J. F.,Jones M. N.,Kroner D. G.An examination of the generalizability of the LSI-R and VRAG probability bins.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2005;32:565-585.
38. Minor K. I.,Wells J. B.,Sims C.Recidivism among federal probationers-Predicting sentence violations.Federal Probation. 2003;67 (1): 31-36.
39. O'Keefe M. L.,Klebe K.,Hromas S.Validation of the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI) for community based offenders in Colorado: Phase II. Colorado Springs: Colorado Department of Corrections; 1998:.
40. Olver M. E.,Stockdale K. C.,Wormith J. S.Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2009;36:329-353.
41. Raynor P.Risk and need assessment in British probation: The contribution of LSI-R.Psychology, Crime & Law. 2007;13:125-138.
42. Reisig M. D.,Holtfreter K.,Morash M.Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime.Justice Quarterly. 2006;23:384-405.
43. Schlager M. D.,Pacheco D.An examination of changes in LSI-R scores over time: Making the case for needs-based case management.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2011;38:541-552.
44. Schlager M. D.,Simourd D. J.Validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) among African American and Hispanic male offenders.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2007;34:545-554.
45. Schmidt F.,Hoge R. D.,Gomes L.Reliability and validity analyses of the youth Level of Services/Case Management Inventory.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2005;32:329-344.
46. Simourd D. J.Use of dynamic risk/needs assessment instruments among long term incarcerated offenders.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2004;31:306-323.
47. Smith P.,Cullen F. T.,Latessa E. J.Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders.Criminology & Public Policy. 2009;8:183-208.
48. Smith P.,Gendreau P.,Goggin C.Correctional counseling & rehabilitation. 2004). Correctional treatment: Accomplishments and realities. In Van VoorhisP.BraswellM.LesterD. (Eds.), Correctional counseling & rehabilitation (5th ed., pp. 285-294). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Van Voorhis P.Braswell M.Lester D., ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson; 2004:285-294.
49. Vose B.,Cullen F. T.,Smith P.The empirical status of the Level of Service Inventory.Federal Probation. 2008;72 (3): 22-29.
50. Whitehead J. T.The effectiveness of felony probation: Results from an eastern state.Justice Quarterly. 1991;8:525-543.