Correctional prediction and the Level of Supervision Inventory

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 29-39

  Dowdy, Eric R ^a   Lacy, Michael G ^a   Unnithan, N Prabha ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10644244358     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00120-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrews, D. A. (1982). The Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI): the first follow-up. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.
2. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4. Andrews, D. A., & Robinson, D. (1984). The Level of Supervision Inventory: second report. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.
5. Baird, C. S. (1981). Probation and parole classification: the Wisconsin model. Corrections Today, 43, 36-41.
6. Bartol, C. R. (1995). Criminal behavior: a psychosocial approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Berecochea, J. E., & Gibbs, J. B. (1991). Inmate classification: a correctional program that works. Evaluation Review, 15, 333-363.
8. Bond, J. (1998). Power Calculator. UCLA Statistics (Online application).
9. Bonta, J. (1989). Native inmates: institutional response, risk, and needs. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 31, 49-62.
10. Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L. L. (1985). Utilization of an interview-based classification instrument: a study of correctional halfway houses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 333-352.
11. Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L. L. (1987). The diversion of incarcerated offenders to correctional halfway houses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 302-323.
12. Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L. L. (1990). Classification to halfway houses: a quasi-experimental evaluation. Criminology, 28, 497-506.
13. Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L. L. (1992). Inmate classification. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 343-353.
14. Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment (pp. 18-32). In: A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Brennan, T. (1987). Classification: an overview of selected methodological issues (pp. 201-248). In: J. M. Gottfredson, M. Tonry (Eds.), Prediction and classification: criminal justice decision making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Cantor, A. B. (1996). Sample-size calculations for Cohen's Kappa. Psychological Methods, 1, 150-153.
17. Coulson, G., Ilacqua, G., Nutbrown, V., Giulekas, D., & Cudjoe, F. (1996). Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 427-439.
18. Feldman, P. (1993). The psychology of crime. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: what works. Criminology, 34, 575-607.
20. Hsieh, F. Y. (1989). Sample size tables for logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 795-802.
21. Kirkpatrick, B. (1998). A study of offenders under intensive community supervision. Perspectives: The Journal of the American Probation and Parole Association, 22, 24-28.
22. Kirkpatrick, B. (1999). Exploratory research of female risk prediction and LSI-R. Corrections Compendium, 24, 1-17.
23. Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 68-99.
24. Loza, W., & Simourd, D. J. (1994). Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI) among male Canadian federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 468-480.
25. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Motiuk, L. L., Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (1986). Classification in correctional halfway houses: the relative and incremental predictive criterion validities of the Megargee-MMPI and LSI systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 33-46.
27. Motiuk, M. S., Motiuk, L. L., & Bonta, J. (1992). A comparison between self-report and interview-based inventories in offender classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 143-159.
28. O'Keefe, M. L., Klebe, K., & Hromas, S. (1998). Validation of the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI) for community based offenders in Colorado: Phase II. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Corrections.
29. Philbrick, P., Gat, L., & Guisti, L. (1993). A community corrections study: the LSI as a predictor of program success? Unpublished manuscript.