Can we trust corporates GHG inventories? An investigation among Canada's large final emitters

Energy Policy

Volumn 63, Issue , 2013, Pages 1075-1085

  Talbot, David ^a   Boiral, Olivier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Climate change; GHG accounting; GHG emissions

Indexed keywords

CAP AND TRADE; CARBON ACCOUNTING; CORPORATES; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; ETHICAL ISSUES; GHG EMISSION; POLICY MAKERS; SHEDDING LIGHT;

CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; INDUSTRY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION INVENTORY; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS;

CANADA;

EID: 84887168698     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.054     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Andrew J., Cortese C. Accounting for climate change and the self-regulation of carbon disclosures. Accounting Forum 2011, 35:130-138.
2. Bansal P., Roth K. Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 2000, 43:717-736.
3. Bebbington J., Larrinaga-González C. Carbon trading: accounting and reporting issues. European Accounting Review 2008, 17:697-717.
4. Boiral O. Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a rational myth?. Organization Science 2007, 18:127-146.
5. Boiral O. Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2013, 26:1.
6. Boiral O., Gendron Y. Sustainable development and certification practices: lessons learned and prospects. Business Strategy and the Environment 2011, 20:331-347.
7. Boiral O., Henri J.-F., Talbot D. Modeling the impacts of corporate commitment on climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment 2012, 21:495-516.
8. Bowen F., Wittneben B. Carbon accounting: negotiating accuracy, consistency and certainty across organisational fields. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2011, 24:1022-1036.
9. Burritt R.L., Schaltegger S., Zvezdov D. Carbon management accounting: explaining practice in leading german companies. Australian Accounting Review 2011, 21:80-98.
10. Busch T. Which emissions do we need to account for in corporate carbon performance? Response to Murray and colleagues. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2011, 15:160-163.
11. Carbon Finance, 2011. State and Trends of the Carbon Market Report 2011. Washington.
12. Cho C.H., Roberts R.W., Patten D.M. The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2010, 35:431-443.
13. Cowan S., Deegan C. Corporate disclosure reactions to Australia's first national emission reporting scheme. Accounting and Finance 2011, 51:409-436.
14. Deegan C. Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures - a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15:282-311.
15. Desrosières A. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning 1998, Harvard University Press; London.
16. Desrosières A. How real are statistics? Four possible attitudes. Social Research 2001, 68:339-355.
17. Dhanda K.K., Hartman L.P. The ethics of carbon neutrality: a critical examination of voluntary carbon offset providers. Journal of Business Ethics 2011, 100:119-149.
18. Downie J., Stubbs W. No title evaluation of Australian companies' scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013, 56:156-163.
19. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14:532-550.
20. Engels A. The European emissions trading scheme: an exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2009, 34:488-498.
21. Environment Canada, 2012a. Facility Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Program - Overview of Reported 2010 Emissions. Ottawa.
22. Environment Canada, 2012b. A Climate Change Plan for the Purposes of the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act 2012. Ottawa.
23. Espeland W., Stevens M. A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology 2008, 49:401.
24. Gendron Y., Spira L.F. What went wrong? The downfall of Arthur Andersen and the construction of controllability boundaries surrounding financial auditing. Contemporary Accounting Research 2009, 26:987-1027.
25. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research 1967, Aldine, Chicago.
26. Government of Quebec, 2012a. 2013-2020 Climate Change Action Plan. Quebec.
27. Government of Quebec, 2012b. Regulation to Amend the Regulation Respecting a Cap-and-Trade System for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowances. Government of Quebec, Quebec.
28. Gray R. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability. and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2010, 35:47-62.
29. Green W., Li Q. Evidence of an expectation gap for greenhouse gas emissions assurance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2012, 25:146-173.
30. Gupta J., Olsthoorn X., Rotenberg E. The role of scientific uncertainty in compliance with the Kyoto protocol to the climate change convention. Environmental Science and Policy 2003, 6:475-486.
31. Hoffman A.J. Getting Ahead of the Curve: Corporate Strategies that Address Climate Change, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington 2006.
32. Hoffmann V.H., Busch T. Corporate carbon performance indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2008, 12:505-520.
33. Hopwood A.G. Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2009, 34:433-439.
34. Hrasky S. Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action?. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2012, 25:174-198.
35. Huang Y.A., Lenzen M., Weber C.L., Murray J., Matthews H.S. The role of input-output analysis for the screening of corporate carbon footprints. Economic Systems Research 2009, 21:217-242.
36. Huang Y.A., Weber C.L., Matthews H.S. Categorization of scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43:8509-8515.
37. IPCC Climate Change 2007 - The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Science 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. ISO, 2007. Greenhouse Gases - Requirements for Greenhouse Gas Validation and Verification Bodies for use in Accreditation or Other Forms of Recognition.
39. Kolk A., Levy D., Pinkse J. Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: the institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review 2008, 17:719-745.
40. Kornberger M., Justesen L., Mouritsen J. When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you: an ethnography of managers in a Big 4 accounting firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2011, 36:514-533.
41. Laufer W. Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics 2003, 43:253-261.
42. MacKenzie D. Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2009, 34:440-455.
43. 2 from fossil fuels. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2008, 12:136-139.
44. 2 emissions?. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2009, 13:4-7.
45. Matthews H.S., Hendrickson C.T., Weber C.L. The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environmental Science and Technology 2008, 42:5839-5842.
46. Maxwell J.A. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, Applied Social Research Methods Series 2005, Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks.
47. McKinsey How companies think about climate change: a McKinsey global survey. McKinsey Quarterly 2008, 1-10.
48. Meinrenken C.J., Kaufman S.M., Ramesh S., Lackner K.S. Fast carbon footprinting for large product portfolios. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2012, 16:669-679.
49. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations, formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 1977, 83:340-363.
50. Midanik L.T., Greenfield T.K. Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: results of the 2000 national alcohol survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2003, 72:209-214.
51. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis 1994, Sage, London. 2nd ed.
52. Milne M.J., Grubnic S. Climate change accounting research: keeping it interesting and different. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2011, 24:948-977.
53. Minx J.C., Wiedmann T., Wood R., Peters G.P., Lenzen M., Owen A., Scott K., Barrett J., Hubacek K., Baiocchi G., Paul A., Dawkins E., Briggs J., Guan D., Suh S., Ackerman F. Input-output analysis and carbon footprinting: an overview of applications. Economic Systems Research 2009, 21:187-216.
54. Moneva J.M., Archel P., Correa C. GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum 2006, 30:121-137.
55. Monni S., Syri S., Pipatti R., Savolainen I. Extension of EU emissions trading scheme to other sectors and gases: consequences for uncertainty of total tradable amount. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus 2007, 7:529-538.
56. Monni S., Syri S., Savolainen I. Uncertainties in the finish greenhouse gas emission inventory. Environmental Science and Policy 2004, 7:87-98.
57. Moore D.A., Tetlock P.E., Tanlu L., Bazerman M.H. Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review 2006, 31:10-29.
58. Neuendorf K.A. The Content Analysis Guidebook, International Organization 2002, Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks.
59. O'Dwyer B. Stakeholder democracy: challenges and contributions from social accounting. Business Ethics A European Review 2005, 14:28-41.
60. O'Dwyer B., Unerman J., Hession E. User needs in sustainability reporting: perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland. European Accounting Review 2005, 14:759-787.
61. Owen D.L., Swift T.a., Humphrey C., Bowerman M. The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions?. European Accounting Review 2000, 9:81-98.
62. Pinkse J., Kolk A. International Business and Global Climate Change 2009, Routledge; New York.
63. Porter T.M. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life 1995, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
64. Power M. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.
65. Power M. Counting, control and calculation: reflections on measuring and management. Human Relations 2004, 57:765-783.
66. Prado-Lorenzo J.M., Garcia-Sanchez I.M. The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 97:391-424.
67. Prado-Lorenzo J.M., Rodríguez-Domínguez L., Gallego-Álvarez I., García-Sánchez I.M. Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in companies world-wide. Management Decision 2009, 47:1133-1157.
68. Rankin M., Windsor C., Wahyuni D. An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system: Australian evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2011, 24:1037-1070.
69. Ratnatunga J. An inconvenient truth about accounting. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research 2007, 5:1-20.
70. Roeser F., Jackson T. Early experiences with emissions trading in the UK. Greener Management International 2002, 43-54.
71. Rypdal K., Winiwarter W. Uncertainties in greenhouse gas emission inventories-evaluation, comparability and implications. Environmental Science and Policy 2001, 4:107-116.
72. Schaltegger S., Csutora M. Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012, 36:1-16.
73. Schultz K., Williamson P. Gaining competitive advantage in a carbon-constrained world: Strategies for european business. European Management Journal 2005, 23:383-391.
74. Simnett R., Nugent M., Huggins A.L. Developing an international assurance standard on greenhouse gas statements. Accounting Horizons 2009, 23:347.
75. Stechemesser K., Guenther E. Carbon accounting: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012, 36:17-38.
76. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques 1990, Sage Publications, London.
77. Sturges J.E., Hanrahan K.J. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qualitative Research 2004, 4:107-118.
78. Sullivan R., Gouldson A. Does voluntary carbon reporting meet investors' needs?. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012, 36:60-67.
79. Thomas D.R. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 2006, 27:237-246.
80. Thomson Reuters, 2012. Point Carbon - Providing Critical Insights Into Energy and Environmental Markets [WWW Document], http://www.pointcarbon.com/.
81. Unerman J., Bebington J., O'Dwyer B. Sustainability, Accounting and Accountability 2007, Routledge, New York.
82. Vine E., Kats G., Sathaye J., Joshi H. International greenhouse gas trading programs: a discussion of measurement and accounting issues. Energy Policy 2003, 31:211-224.
83. WBCSD, WRI, 2004. A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Washington.
84. WCI, 2011. Final Essential Requirements of Mandatory Reporting.
85. Wiedmann T. Editorial: carbon footprint and input-output analysis - an introduction. Economic Systems Research 2009, 21:175-186.
86. Winiwarter W. National greenhouse gas inventories: understanding uncertainties versus potential for improving reliability. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus 2007, 7:443-450.
87. Yin R.K. Case study research: design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods 2008, Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks.