What went wrong? The downfall of Arthur Andersen and the construction of controllability boundaries surrounding financial auditing

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 987-1027

  Gendron, Yves ^a   Spira, Laura F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthur Andersen; Financial auditing; Organizational controls; Regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 76249127806     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: 19113846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1506/car.26.4.1     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abbott, A. D. 1988. The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott. 2002. Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies 39(5):619-44.
3. Anderson-Gough, F, C. Grey, and K. Robson. 2005. "Helping them to forget...": The organizational embedding of gender relations in public audit firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30(5):469-90.
4. Bailey, A. D., Jr. 1995. The practicing professional's mental model: Are we creating the right mental models for new professionals? Issues in Accounting Education 10(1):191-5.
5. Barrett, M., and Y. Gendron. 2006. WebTrust and the "commercialistic auditor": The unrealized vision of developing auditor trustworthiness in cyberspace. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(5):631-62.
6. Bell, T., F. Marrs, I. Solomon, and H. Thomas. 1997. Auditing organizations through a strategic-systems lens. New York: KPMG LLP.
7. Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality. New York: Penguin Books.
8. Briers, M., and W. F. Chua. 2001. The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: A field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26(3):237-69.
9. Burchell, S., C. Clubb, A. Hopwood, J. Hughes, and J. Nahapiet. 1980. The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5(1):5-27.
10. Carpenter, B. W., M. W. Dirsmith, and P. P. Gupta. 1994. Materiality judgments and audit firm culture: Social-behavioral and political perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19(4-5):355-80.
11. Chapman, C. S. 1997. Reflections on a contingent view of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22(2):189-205.
12. Chiapello, E. 1996. Les typologies des modes de contrôle et leurs facteurs de contingence: Un essai d'organisation de la littérature. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit 2(2):51-74.
13. Cooper, D. J., and K. Robson. 2006. Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31(4-5):415-44.
14. Covaleski, M. A., M. W. Dirsmith, J. B. Heian, and S. Samuel. 1998. The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(2):293-327.
15. Dirsmith, M. W., J. B. Heian, and M. A. Covaleski. 1997. Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: The application and social transformation of control in the Big Six. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22(1):1-27.
16. Dirsmith, M. W., and J. P. McAllister. 1982. The organic vs. the mechanistic audit. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 5(3):214-28.
17. Erez, M., and P. C. Earley. 1993. Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Fischer, M. J. 1996. "Real-izing" the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21(2-3):219-42.
19. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
20. Free, C. 2008. Walking the talk? Supply chain accounting and trust among UK supermarkets and suppliers. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(6):629-62.
21. Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Gendron, Y. 2001. The difficult client-acceptance decision in Canadian audit firms: A field investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 18(2):283-310.
23. Gendron, Y. 2002. On the role of the organization in auditors' client-acceptance decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(7):659-84.
24. Gendron, Y, and M. Barrett. 2004. Professionalization in action: Accountants' attempt at building a network of support for the WebTrust seal of assurance. Contemporary Accounting Research 21(3):563-602.
25. Gendron, Y, and L. F. Spira. 2009. Identity narratives under threat: A study of former members of Arthur Andersen. Accounting, Organizations and Society, doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.09.001.
26. Gephart, R. P. 2004. Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal 47(4):454-62.
27. Gibbins, M., and K. Jamal. 2006. The more things change.... CA Magazine 139(6):41-5.
28. Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Glaser, B. 1962. Secondary analysis: A strategy for the use of knowledge from research elsewhere. Social Problems 10(1):70-4.
31. 2-form" strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships. Academy of Management Journal 33(4):725-55.
32. Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby, and C. R. Hinings. 2002. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Accounting, Organizations and Society 45(1):58-80.
33. Hall, R. H. 1968. Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review 33(1):92-104.
34. Heaton, J. 2004. Reworking qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Humphrey, C. 2008. Auditing research: A review across the disciplinary divide. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(2):170-203.
36. Humphrey, C, P. Moizer, and S. Turley. 1992. The audit expectations gap - Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3(2):137-61.
37. Jenkins, J. G., D. R. Deis, J. C. Bedard, and M. B. Curtis. 2008. Accounting firm culture and governance: A research synthesis. Behavioral Research in Accounting 20(1):45-74.
38. Knights, D., and D. Collinson. 1987. Disciplining the shopfloor: A comparison of the disciplinary effects of managerial psychology and financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(5):457-77.
39. Lyon, D. 2001. Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
40. Macdonald, K. M. 1995. The sociology of the professions. London, UK: Sage Publications.
41. McNair, C. J. 1991. Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16(7):635-53.
42. Mélèse, J. 1990. Approches systémiques des organisations. Paris: Les Édition d'Organisation.
43. Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1984. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Morrison, M. A. 2004. Rush to judgment: The lynching of Arthur Andersen & Co. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15(3):335-75.
45. Neu, D., E. Ocampo Gomez, C. Graham, and M. Heincke. 2006. "Informing" technologies and the World Bank. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31(7):635-62.
46. Ouchi, W. G. 1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science 25(9):833-48.
47. Ouchi, W. G. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 25(1):129-41.
48. Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
49. Power, M. 2003. Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28(4):379-94.
50. Power, M. 2004. The risk management of everything: Rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London, UK: Demos.
51. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 2002. Pub. L. no 107-204, 116 Stat. 745.
52. Schutz, A. 1967. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
53. Shafer, W. E., and Y. Gendron. 2005. Analysis of a failed jurisdictional claim: The rhetoric and politics surrounding the AICPA global credential project. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18(4):453-91.
54. Sikka, P., A. Puxty, H. Willmott, and C. Cooper. 1998. The impossibility of eliminating the expectations gap: Some theory and evidence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 9(3):299-330.
55. Squires, S. E., C. J. Smith, L. McDougall, and W. R. Yeack. 2003. Inside Arthur Andersen: Shifting values, unexpected consequences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Stein, M. 2004. The critical period of disasters: Insights from sense-making and psychoanalytic theory. Human Relations 57(10):1243-61.
57. Sullivan, J. D. 1984. The case for the unstructured audit approach. In Auditing Symposium VII: Proceedings of the 1984 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems, eds. J. F. Stettler and N. A. Ford, 61-8. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas.
58. Thompson, K. 1997. Introduction. In Media and cultural regulation, ed. K. Thompson, 1-7. London: Sage Publications.
59. Turner, B. A. 1976. The organizational and interorganizational development of disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(3):378-97.
60. Tyrrall, D., and D. Parker. 2005. The fragmentation of a railway: A study of organizational change. Journal of Management Studies 42(3):507-37.
61. U. S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. 2002. Destruction of Enron-related documents by Andersen personnel. January 24. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives.
62. Weick, K. E. 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(4):628-52.
63. Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.