Generation and calibration of transit hyperpaths

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 36, Issue , 2013, Pages 406-418

  Schmöcker, Jan Dirk ^a   Shimamoto, Hiroshi ^a   Kurauchi, Fumitaka ^b  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bus network; Choice set calibration; Discrete choice modelling; Hyperpath; Smart card data

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; SMART CARDS;

BUS NETWORKS; CHOICE SET FORMATIONS; DISCRETE CHOICE; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS; HYPERPATH; MODEL FORMULATION; TRANSIT ASSIGNMENT;

BUSES;

BUS TRANSPORT; CALIBRATION; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

JAPAN;

EID: 84887160728     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bekhor S., Ben-Akiva M.E., Ramming M.S. Evaluation of choice set generation algorithms for route choice models. Annals of Operation Research 2006, 144:235-247.
2. Bierlaire M. A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 144(1):287-300.
3. Bovy P.H.L. On modelling route choice sets in transportation networks: a synthesis. Transport Reviews 2009, 29(1):43-68.
4. Dial R.B. A probabilistic multi-path traffic assignment mode which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Research 1971, 5:83-111.
5. Fiorenzo-Catalno, M.S., 2007. Choice Set Generation in Multi-Modal Transportation Networks. TRAIL Research Thesis. http://repository.tudelft.nl/assets/uuid:ef3b9c22-b979-4f46-9b02-110c82d67535/ceg_fiorenzo_20070605.pdf.
6. Fonzone, A., Schmöcker, J.-D., Kurauchi, F., Hemdam, S.M.H., 2012. Determinants of Hyperpath Choice in Transit Networks. Presented at 12th Conference on Advanced Systems for Public Transport (CASPT), July 2012.
7. Fonzone A., Schmöcker J.-D., Ma J.S., Fukuda D. Link-based route choice considering risk aversion and regret. Transportation Research Records 2013, 2322:119-128.
8. Frejinger E., Bierlaire M., Ben-Akiva M. Sampling of alternatives for route choice modelling. Transportation Research 2009, 43B(10):984-994.
9. Friedrich M., Hofsass I., Wekeck S. Timetable-based transit assignment using branch and bound techniques. Transportation Research Record 2001, 1754:100-107.
10. Gaudry M., Dagenais M. The dogit model. Transportation Research 1979, 13B:105-112.
11. Hoogendorn-Lanser, S., 2006. A Rule-Based Approach to Choice Set Generation. Bijdrage aan het Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk 2006. http://www.cvs-congres.nl/.
12. Horowitz J.L., Louviere J.J. What is the role of consideration sets in choice modelling?. International Journal of Research in Marketing 1995, 12:39-54.
13. Jotisankasa A., Polak J.W. Modelling learning and adaptation in route and departure time choice behaviour: achievements and prospects. Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models 2005, 133-157. Elsevier, Oxfords. M. Lee-Gosselin, S. Doherty (Eds.).
14. Kato H., Kaneko Y., Inoue M. Comparative analysis of transit assignment evidence from urban railway system in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Transportation 2010, 37(5):775-799.
15. Kurauchi F., Schmöcker J.-D., Fonzone A., Hemdam S.M.H., Shimamto H., Bell M.G.H. Estimation of weights of times and transfers for hyperpath travellers. Transportation Research Records 2012, 2284:89-99.
16. Kurauchi, F., Schmöcker, J.-D., Shimamto, H., 2012. Understanding demand/supply variations on transit network using smartcard data. Paper submitted for presentation at the 5th International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability, Hong Kong, December 2012.
17. Lerman S.R., Ben-Akiva M. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, The MIT press.
18. Manski C. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 1977, 8:229-254.
19. Morikawa T. Destination choice analysis of vacation trips considering attractiveness of regions and probabilistic choice sets. Infrastructure Planning Review 1991, 9:117-124. (in Japanese).
20. Nguyen S., Pallottino S. Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks. European Journal of Operational Research 1988, 37:176-186.
21. Nguyen S., Pallottino S., Gendreau M. Implicit enumeration of hyperpaths in a logit model for transit networks. Transportation Science 1998, 32(1):54-64.
22. Nökel, K., Wekeck, S., 2009. Boarding and alighting in frequency-based transit assignment. Paper presented at 88th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington DC, January 2009.
23. Nuzzolo A. Schedule-based transit assignment models. Advanced Modeling for Transit Operations and Service 2003, Pergamon. W.H.K. Lam, M.G.H. Bell (Eds.).
24. Ortuzar J., Willumsen L.G. Modelling Transport 2002, Wiley. third ed.
25. Pelletier M., Trepanier M., Morency C. Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transportation Research 2011, 19C:557-568.
26. Schmöcker, J.-D., Bell, M.G.H., Kurauchi, F., Shimamto, H., 2009. A game theoretic approach to the determination of hyperpaths in transportation networks. In: Selected Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (ISTTT). Hong Kong, July 2009.
27. Spiess H., Florian M. Optimal strategies: a new assignment model for transit networks. Transportation Research 1989, 23B:83-102.
28. Swait J. Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice. Transportation Research 2001, 25B:643-666.
29. Swait, J., Ben-Akiva, M., 1986. An analysis of the effects of captivity on travel time and cost elasticities. In: Annals of the 1985 International Conference on Travel Behavior, 16-19 April, Noordwijk, Holland, pp. 113-128.