Comparative analysis of transit assignment: Evidence from urban railway system in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area

Transportation

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 775-799

  Kato, Hironori ^a   Kaneko, Yuichiro ^b   Inoue, Masashi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Creative Research and Planning Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Comparative analysis; Tokyo Metropolitan Area; Transit assignment; Urban rail

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS RESULTS; CASE ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; COMPUTATION TIME; DATA SETS; ERROR COMPONENTS; IN-VEHICLE; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT; MULTINOMIALS; RAIL ROUTES; REVEALED PREFERENCE; ROUTE CHOICE; STOCHASTIC TRAFFIC; STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM; TOKYO METROPOLITAN AREAS; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT; TRANSIT ASSIGNMENT; URBAN RAIL; URBAN RAILWAY; USER EQUILIBRIUM;

RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

COST FUNCTIONS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEURISTICS; LOGIT ANALYSIS; METROPOLITAN AREA; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; STOCHASTICITY; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; URBAN TRANSPORT;

HONSHU; JAPAN; KANTO; TOKYO [KANTO]; TOKYO [TOKYO (PRF)];

EID: 77956416473     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-010-9295-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aoki, E.: Dawn of Japanese railways. Jpn. Railw. Transp. Rev. 1, 28-30 (1994).
2. Aoki, E., Imashiro, M., Kato, S., Wakuda, Y.: A History of Japanese Railways 1872-1999. East Japan Railway Culture Foundation, Tokyo (2000).
3. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S. R.: Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985).
4. Boyce, D., Bar-Gera, H.: Validation of multiclass urban travel forecasting models combining origin-destination, mode, and route choices. J. Reg. Sci. 43(3), 517-540 (2003).
5. Cascetta, E., Nussolo, A., Russo, F., Vietta, A.: A new route choice logit model overcoming IIA problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Lesort, J. B. (ed.) Transportation and Traffic Theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996).
6. Cominetti, R., Correa, J.: Common lines and passenger assignment in congested transit networks. Transp. Sci. 35, 250-267 (2001).
7. Daganzo, C.: Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Applications to Demand Forecasting. Academic Press, New York (1979).
8. Daganzo, C., Sheffi, Y.: On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transp. Sci. 11, 253-274 (1977).
9. De Cea, J., Fernandez, E.: Transit assignment for congested public transport systems: An equilibrium model. Transp. Sci. 27(2), 133-147 (1993).
10. Dial, R. B.: A probabilistic multi-path traffic assignment model which obviates the need for path enumeration. Transp. Res. 5, 83-111 (1971).
11. Flyvbjerg, B.: Measuring inaccuracy in travel demand forecasting: methodological consideration regarding ramp up and sampling. Transp. Res. 39A(6), 522-530 (2005).
12. Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., Buhl, S. L.: Inaccuracy in traffic forecasts. Transp Rev 26(1), 1-24 (2006).
13. Hibino, N.: A Study on Analyzing Methods for Future Urban Railway Planning Focusing on Travel Behavior of Railway Passengers. Dissertation, Tokyo University of Science (2004).
14. Institute for Transport Policy Studies: Metropolitan Transport Census in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area (in Japanese) (2000).
15. Kain, J. F.: Deception in Dallas: strategic misrepresentation in rail transit promotion and evaluation. J. Am. Plan Assoc. 56(2), 184-196 (1990).
16. Kato, S.: Development of large cities and progress in railway transportation. Jpn. Railw. Transp. Rev. 44-48 (1996).
17. Kato, H., Shikai, J., Kato, S., Ishida, H.: Cost-benefit analysis for improvement of transfer service at urban railway stations. In: World Transport Research: Selected Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research. CD-ROM (2003).
18. Kato, H., Kaneko, Y., Inoue, M.: Choice of travel demand forecast models: comparative analysis in urban rail route choice. In: Proceedings of European Transport Conference 2007, Noordwijkerhout (October 2007).
19. Kurauchi, F., Bell, M. G. H., Schoemaker, J. D.: Capacity constrained transit assignment with common lines. J. Model Algorithm 2(4), 309-327 (2003).
20. Kuwahara, M.: Empirical comparison of traffic assignment methods. Traffic Eng. 23(2), 17-25 (1988). (in Japanese).
21. Lam, W. H. K., Lo, H. K.: Traffic assignment methods. In: Hensher, D. A., Button, K. J., Haynes, K. E., Stopher, P. R. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, pp. 609-625. Elsevier, London (2004).
22. Maher, M. J., Hughes, P. C.: A probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model. Transp. Res. 31B(4), 341-355 (1997).
23. Ministry of Transport, Japan: Research Report on Indexes of Level of Rail Service and Impact of Rail Investment (in Japanese) (March 1995).
24. Morichi, S., Iwakura, S., Morishige, S., Itoh, M., Hayasaki, S.: Tokyo metropolitan rail network long-range plan for the 21st century. In: Presented at the Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (January 2001).
25. Ortuzar, J. de D., Willmusen, L. G.: Modelling Transport. Wiley, New York (1990).
26. Powell, W. B., Sheffi, Y.: The convergence of equilibrium algorithm with predetermined step sizes. Transp. Sci. 16(1), 45-55 (1982).
27. Ryan, J.: Predicted and actual ridership for recent new starts projects. In: Presented at the 83rd Annual TRB Meeting, Washington, DC (January 2004).
28. Schmocker, J. D., Bell, M. G. H., Kurauchi, F.: A quasi-dynamic capacity constrained frequency-based transit assignment model. Transp. Res. 42B(10), 925-945 (2008).
29. Sheffi, Y.: Urban Transportation Networks. Prentice-Hall, INC, New Jersey (1985).
30. Train, K. E.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).
31. van Vliet, D., Bergman, T., Scheltes, W. H.: Equilibrium traffic assignment with multiple user classes. In: Proceedings of Seminar M, PTRC 14th Summer Annual Meeting, pp. 111-121. PTRC Education and Research Services Ltd, London (1986).
32. Yai, T., Iwakura, S., Morichi, S.: Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior. Transp. Res. 31B(3), 195-208 (1997).
33. Zhao, Y., Kockelman, K. M.: The propagation of uncertainty through travel demand models: An exploratory analysis. Ann. Reg. Sci. 36(1), 145-163 (2002).