Cost-effectiveness analysis: Comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Clinical article

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 546-554

  Qureshi, Sheeraz A ^a   McAnany, Steven ^a   Goz, Vadim ^a   Koehler, Steven M ^a   Hecht, Andrew C ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Cervical disc replacement; Cost effectiveness; Quality adjusted life year

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERVICOBRACHIAL NEURALGIA; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL CHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION COST; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; MEDICARE; PHYSICIAN; PROSTHESIS; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; REIMBURSEMENT; SINGLE LEVEL ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION; SINGLE LEVEL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT; SPINE FUSION; SPINE SURGERY; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DISKECTOMY; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; RADICULOPATHY; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84887053782     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12623     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD: Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1305-1312, 2008.
2. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP, Carlson CS, Goffin J: The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J 4 (6 Suppl):303S-309S, 2004. (Pubitemid 39497319)
3. Bhadra AK, Raman AS, Casey AT, Crawford RJ: Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 18:232-237, 2009.
4. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK: Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty- Two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1298-1307, 1993.
5. Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV: Longterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:308-318, 2010.
6. Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB: A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA 275:858-865, 1996. (Pubitemid 26087223)
7. Coric D, Finger F, Boltes P: Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan Cervical Disc: Early clinical results from a single investigational site. J Neurosurg Spine 4:31-35, 2006.
8. Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, et al: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:348-358, 2011.
9. Emery SE, Bolesta MJ, Banks MA, Jones PK: Robinson anterior cervical fusion comparison of the standard and modified techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:660-663, 1994. (Pubitemid 24098304)
10. Epstein NE: Efficacy and outcomes of dynamic-plated singlelevel anterior diskectomy/fusion with additional analysis of comparative costs. Surg Neurol Int 2:9, 2011.
11. Fraser JF, Hartl R: Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: A meta-analysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 6:298-303, 2007. (Pubitemid 47066085)
12. Fryback DG, Dasbach EJ, Klein R, Klein BE, Dorn N, Peterson K, et al: The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality factors. Med Decis Making 13: 89-102, 1993. (Pubitemid 23113445)
13. Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC: Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:367-371, 2010.
14. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, et al: Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery 51:840-847, 2002. (Pubitemid 36331083)
15. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, et al: Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: singlelevel and bi-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2673-2678, 2003. (Pubitemid 37543472)
16. Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Lipscomb B: A clinical analysis of 4- And 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 12:261-269, 2010.
17. Gore DR, Sepic SB: Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs: A review of one hundred and forty-six patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:667-671, 1984. (Pubitemid 15190612)
18. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ, et al: Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:101-107, 2009.
19. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519-528, 1999. (Pubitemid 29211592)
20. Malter AD, Larson EB, Urban N, Deyo RA: Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for the treatment of herniated intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1048-1055, 1996. (Pubitemid 26148161)
21. McAfee PC, Reah C, Gilder K, Eisermann L, Cunningham B: A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:943-952, 2012.
22. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA: Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198-209, 2007. (Pubitemid 47066071)
23. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, et al: Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275-286, 2009.
24. Naimark D, Krahn MD, Naglie G, Redelmeier DA, Detsky AS: Primer on medical decision analysis: part 5-working with Markov processes. Med Decis Making 17:152-159, 1997. (Pubitemid 27157030)
25. Nesterenko SO, Riley LH III, Skolasky RL: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: current state and trends in treatment for cervical disc pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1470-1474, 2012.
26. Peng CW, Yue WM, Basit A, Guo CM, Tow BP, Chen JL, et al: Intermediate results of the prestige LP cervical disc replacement: clinical and radiological analysis with minimum twoyear follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E105-E111, 2011.
27. Riew KD, Buchowski JM, Sasso RC, Zdeblick T, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA: Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2354-2364, 2008.
28. Robertson JT, Papadopolous SM, Traynelis VC: Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical arthroplasty: A prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine 3:417-423, 2005.
29. Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC: The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. JAMA 276:1172-1177, 1996. (Pubitemid 26329746)
30. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG: Artificial disc versus fusion: A prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow- up on 99 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2933-2942, 2007.
31. Schulman KA: Medicare and cost-effectiveness analysis. N Engl J Med 354:207-209, 2006 (Letter).
32. Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR: Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. JAMA 276: 1339-1341, 1996. (Pubitemid 26346934)
33. SooHoo NF, Kominski G: Cost-effectiveness analysis of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2446-2455, 2004. (Pubitemid 39473086)
34. Tengs TO, Wallace A: One thousand health-related quality-oflife estimates. Med Care 38:583-637, 2000.
35. Tumeh JW, Moore SG, Shapiro R, Flowers CR: Practical approach for using Medicare data to estimate costs for cost-effectiveness analysis. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 5:153-162, 2005. (Pubitemid 40553026)
36. Upadhyaya CD, Wu JC, Trost G, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Tay B, et al: Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16:216-228, 2012.
37. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB: Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 276:1253-1258, 1996. (Pubitemid 26337709)
38. Wohns R: Safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient cervical disc arthroplasty. Surg Neurol Int 1:77, 2010.
39. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR: Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating: A 5- To 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2138-2144, 2005. (Pubitemid 41429192)
40. Zechmeister I, Winkler R, Mad P: Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: A systematic review. Eur Spine J 20:177-184, 2011.