Intermediate results of the prestige LP cervical disc replacement: Clinical and radiological analysis with minimum two-year follow-up

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Peng, Chan Wearn Benedict ^a   Yue, Wai Mun ^a   Basit, Abdul ^a   Guo, Chang Ming ^a   Tow, Benjamin Phak Boon ^a   Chen, John Li Tat ^a   Nidu, Maran ^a   Yeo, William ^a   Tan, Seang Beng ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Cervical arthroplasty; clinical outcome; radiologic outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; JAPANESE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATION SCORE; LORDOSIS; MALE; MODIFIED AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NERVE COMPRESSION; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADICULOPATHY; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SPINAL CORD ATROPHY; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MOBILITY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VISUAL ANALOGUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADICULOPATHY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPONDYLOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551536744     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d76f99     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clnical follow-up study. Spine 2005;30: 2138-44.
2. Epstein NE. Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion without plate instrumentation in 178 patients. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:1-8.
3. Thorell W, Cooper J, Hellbusch L, et al. The long-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy with and without intervertebral bone graft placement. Neurosurgery 1998;43:268-73.
4. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 2002;27:2431-4.
5. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 1999;24:670-5.
6. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:519-28.
7. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2002;96:17-21.
8. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. Late radiographic fi ndings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 1993; 18:2167-73.
9. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F, et al. Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:403-10.
10. Cummins BH, Robertson JT, Gill SS. Surgical experience with an implanted artifi cial cervical joint. J Neurosurg 1998;88:943-8.
11. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery 2002;51:840-7.
12. Goffi n J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, et al. Intermediate followup after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 2003;23:2673-8.
13. Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:307-13.
14. Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Nelson RJ, et al. The new Frenchay artifi cial cervical joint: results from a two year pilot study. Spine 2002;27:2446-52.
15. Robertson JT, Metcalf NH. Long-term outcome after implantation of the Prestige I disc in an end-stage indication: 4-year results from a pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:E10.
16. Porchet F, Metcalf NH. Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:E6.
17. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, et al. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;6:198-209.
18. Pickett GD, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, et al. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:30-5.
19. Shim CS, Lee SH, Park HJ, et al. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:465-70.
20. Johnson JP, Lauryssen C, Cambron HO, et al. Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artifi cial disc. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17: E14.
21. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, et al. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J2001;10:320-4.
22. Albert TJ, Vaccaro A. Postlaminectomy kyphosis. Spine 1998;23: 2738-45.
23. Ferch RD, Shad A, Cadoux-Hudson TA, et al. Anterior correction of cervical kyphotic deformity: effect on myelopathy, neck pain, and sagittal alignment. J Neurosurg 2004;100:13-9.
24. Shim CS, Shin HD, Lee SH. Posterior avulsion fracture at adjacent vertebral body during cervical disc replacement with Prodisc-C: a case report. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:468-72.
25. Bartels RH, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report. Neurosurgery 2005;57:E194.
26. Parkinson JF, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:377-80.