Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 29, Issue , 2014, Pages 125-127

  Park, Babette ^a   Plass, Jan L ^b   Brünken, Roland ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Emotion; Interest; Motivation; Multimedia learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887017542     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.005     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. D'Mello S., Lehman B., Pekrun R., Graesser A. Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction 2013, 29:153-170.
2. Gottfried A. Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990, 82:525-538. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.525.
3. Kalyuga S., Ayres P., Chandler P., Sweller J. The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist 2003, 38:23-32. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4.
4. Leutner D. Cognitive and affective processes in learning with multimedia: commentary on papers by Magner etal., Plass etal., and D'Mello, etal. Learning and Instruction 2013, in press.
5. Magner U.I.E., Schwonke R., Aleven V., Popescu O., Renkl A. Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction 2013, 29:141-152.
6. The cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
7. Mayer R.E. Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 2013, 29:171-173.
8. McGuinness C. Talking about thinking: The role of metacognition in teaching thinking. Lines of thinking 1990, 310-312. Academic Press, San Diego. K. Gilhooly, M. Deane, G. Erdos (Eds.).
9. Moreno R. Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback on discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science 2004, 32:99-113. 10.1023/B: TRUC.0000021811.66966.1d.
10. Moreno R. Instructional technology: promise and pitfalls. Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together 2005, 1-19. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT. L. Pytlik Zillig, M. Bodvarsson, R. Bruning (Eds.).
11. Moreno R. Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2006, 22:149-158. 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x.
12. Moreno R. Optimizing learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2007, 21:765-781. 10.1002/acp.1348.
13. Moreno R. Learning from animated classroom exemplars: the case for guiding student teachers' observations with metacognitive prompts. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation 2009, 15:487-501. 10.1080/13803610903444592.
14. Moreno R., Durán R. Do multiple representations need explanations? The role of verbal guidance and individual differences in multimedia mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 2004, 96:492-503. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.492.
15. Moreno R., Mayer R.E., Spires H., Lester J. The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents?. Cognition and Instruction 2001, 19:177-213. 10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_02.
16. Moreno R., Park B. Cognitive load theory: historical development and relation to other theories. Cognitive load theory 2010, 9-28. Cambridge University Press, New York. J. Plass, R. Moreno, R. Brünken (Eds.).
17. Morris C.C. Retrieval processes underlying confidence in comprehension judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:223-232. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.223.
18. Park B., Moreno R., Seufert T., Brünken R. Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect: a multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior 2011, 27:5-10. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.006.
19. Plass J.L., Chun D.M., Mayer R.E., Leutner D. Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90:25-36. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.25.
20. Plass J.L., Heidig S., Hayward E.O., Homer B.D., Um E. Emotional design in multimedia learning: effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction 2013, 29:128-140.
21. Cognitive load theory 2010, Cambridge University Press, New York. J. Plass, R. Moreno, R. Brünken (Eds.).
22. Robinson D. Editor's note: remembering Roxana Moreno. Educational Psychology Review 2010, 22:363-374. 10.1007/s10648-010-9147-2.
23. Seufert T., Schütze M., Brünken R. Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: an aptitude-treatment-interaction study. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:28-42. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.01.002.
24. Um E.R., Plass J.L., Hayward E.O., Homer B.D. Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 104:485-498. 10.1037/a0026609.