Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 29, Issue , 2014, Pages 171-173

  Mayer, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive load; Instructional design; Motivation; Multimedia learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887020163     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brunken R., Plass J.L., Moreno R. Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. Cognitive load theory 2010, 253-272. Cambridge University Press, New York. J.L. Plass, R. Moreno, R. Brunken (Eds.).
2. D'Mello S., Lehman B., Pekrun R., Graesser A. Confusion can be beneficial to learning. Learning and Instruction 2013, 29:153-170.
3. Grosse C.S., Renkl A. Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: can this foster learning outcomes?. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17:612-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.008.
4. Magner U.I.E., Schwonke R., Aleven V., Popescu O., Renkl A. Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction 2013, 29:141-152.
5. Mayer R.E. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 31-48. Cambridge University Press, New York. R. Mayer (Ed.).
6. Mayer R.E. Learning and instruction 2008, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2nd ed.
7. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
8. Mayer R.E. Applying the science of learning 2011, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
9. Moreno R. Instructional technology: promise and pitfalls. Technology-based education 2005, 1-20. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT. L.M. PytlikZillig, M. Bodvarsson, R. Brunning (Eds.).
10. Moreno R. Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2006, 23:149-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x.
11. Moreno R. Optimising learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2007, 21:765-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1348.
12. Moreno R. Learning from animated classroom exemplars: the case for guiding student teachers' observations with metacognitive prompts. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation 2009, 15:487-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803610903444592.
13. Moreno R., Mayer R.E. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review 2007, 19:309-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2.
14. Plass J.L., Heidig S., Hayward E.O., Homer B.D., Um E. Emotional design in multimedia learning: effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction 2013, 29:128-140.
15. Schnotz W. An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 49-70. Cambridge University Press, New York. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
16. Sweller J. Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 19-30. Cambridge University Press, New York. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
17. Sweller J., Ayres P., Kalyuga S. Cognitive load theory 2011, Springer, New York.
18. Um E., Plass J.L., Hayward E.O., Homer B.D. Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 2011, 104:485-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026609.