Electro-catalytic oxidation in treating C.I. Acid Red 73 wastewater coupled with nanofiltration and energy consumption analysis

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 452, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-10

  Xu, Li ^a   Zhang, Lichao ^a   Du, Lishun ^b   Zhang, Shaoxing ^c  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Hualu Engineering and Technology Co Ltd   (China)

^c Tianjin Mainland Hydrogen Equipment Company Limited   (China)

Author keywords

Electro catalytic oxidation; Electrode; Nanofiltration; Permeation flux

Indexed keywords

CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; ELECTRO-CATALYTIC OXIDATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS; INITIAL FEED CONCENTRATION; OPERATING CONDITION; OPERATING PARAMETERS; OPERATING PRESSURE; PERMEATION FLUXES;

ANTIMONY; AZO DYES; ELECTRODES; ENERGY UTILIZATION; NANOFILTRATION; SOL-GELS; VARNISH; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION;

CATALYTIC OXIDATION;

ANTIMONY DERIVATIVE; AZO DYE; CI ACID RED 73; TIN OXIDE; TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; YTTRIUM;

ARTICLE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; NANOFILTRATION; OXIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; VARNISH; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84887003476     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.064     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Vandevivere P.C., Bianchi R., Verstraete W. Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wet-processing industry: review of emerging technologies. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1998, 72:289-302.
2. Van Der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C., Van Gestel T., Doyen W., Leysen R. A review of pressure-driven membrane processes in wastewater treatment and drinking water production. Environ. Prog. 2003, 22:46-56.
3. A. Al-Amoudi, R.W. Lovitta, Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency, J. Membr. Sci. 303 (2007) 4-28.
4. Gao W., Liang H., Ma J., Han M., Chen Z.L., Han Z.S., Li G.B. Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: a review. Desalination 2011, 272:1-8.
5. Jung C.W., Son H.J., Kang L.S. Effects of membrane material and pretreatment coagulation on membrane fouling: fouling mechanism and NOM removal. Desalination 2006, 197:154-164.
6. Lim A.L, Bai R. Membrane fouling and cleaning in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 216:279-290.
7. Martinelli L., Guigui C., Line A. Characterisation of hydrodynamics induced by air injection related to membrane fouling behavior. Desalination 2010, 250:587-591.
8. Boributh S., Chanachai A., Jiraratananon R. Modification of PVDF membrane by chitosan solution for reducing protein fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:97-104.
9. Weigert T., Altmann J., Ripperger S. Crossflow electrofiltration in pilot scale. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 159:253-262.
10. Sung M., Huang C.P., Weng Y.H., Lin Y.T., Li K.C. Enhancing the separation of nano-sized particles in low-salt suspensions by electrically assisted cross-flow filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 54:170-177.
11. Chiu T.Y., Garcia F.J. Critical flux enhancement in electrically assisted microfiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 78:62-68.
12. Hakimhashemi M., Gebreyohannes A.Y., Saveyn H., Van der Meeren Paul, Verliefde Arne Combined effects of operational parameters on electro-ultrafiltration process characteristics. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 403-404:227-235.
13. Yang G.C., Yang T.Y., Tsai S.H. Crossflow electro-microfiltration of oxide CMP wastewater. Water Res. 2003, 37:785-792.
14. Weng Y.H., Li K.C., Chaung H.L., Huang C.P. Removal of humic substances (HS) from water by electro-microfiltration (EMF). Water Res. 2006, 40:1783-1794.
15. Kim J.O., Jung J.T., Yeom I.T., Aoh G.H. Electric fields treatment for the reduction of membrane fouling, the inactivation of bacteria and the enhancement of particle coagulation. Desalination 2007, 202:31-37.
16. Chen G. Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 38:11-41.
17. Comninellis C., Kapalka A., Malato S., Parsons S.A., Poulios Ioannis, Mantzavinos Dionissios Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: advances and trends for R&D. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 83:769-776.
18. Zhu X., Ni J., Lai P. Advanced treatment of biologically pretreated coking wastewater by electrochemical oxidation using boron-doped diamond electrodes. Water Res. 2009, 43:4347-4355.
19. Martinez-Huitle C.A., Ferro S. Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for the wastewater treatment: direct and indirect processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35:1324-1340.
20. Panizza M., Cerisola G. Direct and mediated anodic oxidation of organic pollutants. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109:6541-6569.
21. Li X.Y., Cui Y.H., Feng Y.J., Xie Z.M., Gu J.D. Reaction pathways and mechanisms of the electrochemical degradation of phenol on different electrodes. Water Res. 2005, 39:1972-1981.
22. Xiong Y., Strunk P.J., Xia H., Zhu X., Karlsson H.T. Treatment of dye wastewater containing acid orange II using a cell with three-phase three-dimensional electrode. Water Res. 2001, 35:4226-4230.
23. Xu L., Du L.S., Wang C., Xu W. Nanofiltration coupled with electrolytic oxidation in treating simulated dye wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 409-410:329-334.
24. 5 anode preparation for electrochemical oxidation of organic contaminants in water and wastewater. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2008, 38:31-37.
25. 2 electrodes in the oxidation of 4-chlorophenol. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 19:1380-1386.
26. 5 anodes. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1997, 27:970-974.
27. 2 electrode and its application in the anodic degradation of the azo dye Acid Black 194. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2011, 6:4341-4354.
28. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance-a general assessment. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1998, 76:885-893.
29. Choi H., Zhang K., Dionysiou D.D., Oerther D.B., Sorial G.A. Effect of permeation flux and tangential flow on membrane fouling for wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 45:68-78.
30. Cho J., Amy G., Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 164:89-110.
31. Hine F., Yasuda M., Noda T., Yoshida T., Okauda J. Electrochemical behavior of the oxide-coated metal anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1979, 126:1439.
32. Chakraborty S., Purkait M.K., DasGupta S., De S., Basu J.K. Nanofiltration of textile plant effluent for color removal and reduction in COD. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 31:141-151.
33. 2 electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55:3606-3613.
34. Martinez-Huitle C.A., Brillas E. Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical method: a general review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 87:105-145.
35. Patel T., Nath K. Alleviation of flux decline in cross flow nanofiltration of two-component dye and salt mixture by low frequency ultrasonic irradiation. Desalination 2013, 317:132-141.
36. Sarkar B., DasGupta S., De S. Flux decline during electric field-assisted cross-flow ultrafiltration of mosambi (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) juice. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 331:75-83.
37. Chiu T.Y., Garcia Garcia F.J. Critical flux enhancement in electrically assisted microfiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 78:62-68.
38. Bes-Pia A., Cuartas-Uribe B., Mendoza-Roca J., Alcaina-Miranda M.I. Study of the behavior of different NF membranes for the reclamation of a secondary textile effluent in rinsing processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 178:341-348.
39. Van wagner E.M., Sagle A.C., Sharma M.M., La Y.H., Freeman B.D. Surface modification of commercial polyamide desalination membranes using poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether to enhance membrane fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 367:273-287.