Combined effects of operational parameters on electro-ultrafiltration process characteristics

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 403-404, Issue , 2012, Pages 227-235

  Hakimhashemi, Maryam ^a   Gebreyohannes, Abaynesh Yihdego ^a   Saveyn, Hans ^a   Van der Meeren, Paul ^a   Verliefde, Arne ^a,b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alumina; Conductivity; Crossflow electro ultrafiltration; Flux improvement; PH

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA SUSPENSIONS; BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; COMBINED EFFECT; CONDUCTIVITY CHANGES; CROSS FLOWS; DIFFERENT EFFECTS; ELECTRO-ULTRA-FILTRATION; ELECTRODE REACTIONS; ELECTROFILTRATION; EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS; FEED SOLUTION; FLUX ENHANCEMENT; ISO-ELECTRIC POINTS; MASS TRANSFER LIMITATION; OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS; PERMEATE FLUX; PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS; PROCESS PARAMETERS; RESPONSE FACTOR; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

ALUMINA; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC FIELDS; IONIC STRENGTH; PH; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); ULTRAFILTRATION;

PH EFFECTS;

ALUMINUM; POTASSIUM NITRATE;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROULTRAFILTRATION; FLOW KINETICS; IONIC STRENGTH; PARTICLE SIZE; PH; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURE; ULTRAFILTRATION; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 84859265910     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.054     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London. second ed.
2. Scholz W., Lucas M. Techno-economic evaluation of membrane filtration for the recovery and re-use of tanning chemicals. Water Res. 2003, 37:1859-1867.
3. Salahi A., Abbasi M., Mohammadi T. Permeate flux decline during ultrafiltration of oily wastewater: experimental and modeling. Desalination 2010, 251:153-160.
4. Lee H.H., Weng Y.H., Li K.C. Electro-ultrafiltration study on aldrich humic substances with different molecular weights. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:23-29.
5. Weng Y.H., Chaung-Hsieh L.H., Lee H.H., Li K.C., Huang C.P. Removal of arsenic and humic substances by electro-ultrafiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 122:171-176.
6. Weigert T., Altmann J., Ripperger S. Crossflow electrofiltration in pilot scale. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 159:253-262.
7. Kim J.O., Jung J.T., Yeom I.T., Aoh G.H. Electric fields treatment for the reduction of membrane fouling, the inactivation of bacteria and the enhancement of particle coagulation. Desalination 2007, 202:31-37.
8. Bowen W.R., Ahmad A.L. Pulsed electrophoretic filter-cake release in dead-end membrane processes. AlChE J. 1997, 43:959-970.
9. Enevoldsen A.D., Hansen E.B., Jonsson G. Electro-ultrafiltration of industrial enzyme solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 299:28-37.
10. Huotari H.M., Huisman I.H., Trägårdh G. Electrically enhanced crossflow membrane filtration of oily waste water using the membrane as a cathode. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:49-60.
11. Huotari H.M., Trägårdh G., Huisman I.H. Crossflow membrane filtration enhanced by an external DC electric field: a review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1999, 77:461-468.
12. Weber K., Stahl W. Improvement of filtration kinetics by pressure electrofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 26:69-80.
13. Hsieh L.H.C., Weng Y.H., Huang C.P., Li K.C. Removal of arsenic from groundwater by electro-ultrafiltration. Desalination 2008, 234:402-408.
14. Chuang C.J., Fang C.W., Tung K.L. Electro-microfiltration of colloidal suspensions. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2003, 38:797-816.
15. Jagannadh S.N., Muralidhara H.S. Electrokinetic methods to control membrane fouling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35:1133-1140.
16. Weng Y.H., Li K.C., Chaung-Hsieh L.H., Huang C.P. Removal of humic substances from water by electro-microfiltration. Water Res. 2006, 40:1783-1794.
17. Brisson G., Britten M., Pouliot Y. Electrically-enhanced crossflow microfiltration for separation of lactoferrin from whey protein mixtures. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 297:206-216.
18. Lin Y.T., Sung M., Sanders P.F., Marinucci A., Huang C.P. Separation of nano-sized colloidal particles using cross-flow electro-filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 58:138-147.
19. Sung M., Huang C.P., Weng Y.H., Lin Y.T., Li K.C. Enhancing the separation of nano-sized particles in low-salt suspensions by electrically assisted cross-flow filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 54:170-177.
20. Šmídová D., MikuláŠek P., Wakeman R.J., Velikovská P. Influence of ionic strength and pH of dispersed systems on microfiltration. Desalination 2004, 163:323-332.
21. Akay G., Wakeman R.J. Electric field enhanced crossflow microfiltration of hydrophobically modified water soluble polymers. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 131:229-236.
22. Sarkar B., DasGupta S., De S. Electric field enhanced fractionation of protein mixture using ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 341:11-20.
23. Chiu T.Y., Garcia Garcia F.J. Critical flux enhancement in electrically assisted microfiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 78:62-68.
24. Henry J.D., Lawler L.F., Kuo C.H.A. A solid/liquid separation process based on cross flow and electrofiltration. AlChE J 1977, 23:851-859.
25. 2 suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 254:295-301.
26. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.N., Leckie J.O. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 290:86-94.
27. Weng Y.H., Li K.C. Electrically enhanced crossflow ultrafiltration for treatment of water containing humic acid: a preliminary study. Adv. Asian Environ. Eng. 2003, 3:60-66.
28. Saveyn H., Van der Meeren P., Hofmann R., Stahl W. Modelling two-sided electrofiltration of quartz suspensions: importance of electrochemical reactions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60:6768-6779.