Alleviation of flux decline in cross flow nanofiltration of two-component dye and salt mixture by low frequency ultrasonic irradiation

Desalination

Volumn 317, Issue , 2013, Pages 132-141

  Patel, Tejal M ^a   Nath, Kaushik ^a  

^a G H PATEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Flux; Membrane; Nanofiltration; Reactive dye; Resistance; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; CROSS-FLOW NANOFILTRATION; LOW FREQUENCY ULTRASONIC IRRADIATIONS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; REACTIVE DYES; RESISTANCE-IN-SERIES MODEL; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; ULTRASONIC IRRADIATION;

ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; FLUXES; IRRADIATION; MEMBRANES; ULTRASONICS; WATER TREATMENT;

NANOFILTRATION;

DYE; FILTRATION; HIGH PRESSURE; IRRADIATION; MEMBRANE; STEADY-STATE EQUILIBRIUM; TEMPERATURE; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 84876333096     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Van der Bruggen B., Bracken L., Vandecasteele C. Evaluation of parameters describing flux decline in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds. Desalination 2002, 147:281-288.
2. Petrinic I., Andersen N.R., Soster-Turk S., Marechal A.M.L. The removal of reactive dye printing compounds using nanofiltration. Dyes Pigments 2007, 74:512-518.
3. Najarian S., Bellhouse B.J. Effect of liquid pulsation on protein fractionation using ultrafiltration processes. J. Mem. Sci. 1996, 114:245-253.
4. Cui Z.F., Chang S., Fane A.G. The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. J Mem. Sci. 2003, 221(1-2):1-35.
5. Schwinge J., Wiley D.E., Fane A.G. Novel spacer design improves observed flux. J Mem. Sci. 2004, 229:53-61.
6. Hargrove S.C., Parthasarathy H., Ilias S. Flux enhancement in crossflow membrane filtration by flow reversal: a case study on ultrafiltration of BSA. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2003, 38:3133-3144.
7. Auddy K., De S., DasGupta S. Flux enhancement in nanofiltration of dye solution using turbulent promoters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40:31-39.
8. Rai P., Majumdar G.C., Dasgupta S., De S. Flux enhancement during ultrafiltration of mosambi (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) juice. J. Food Process Eng. 2010, 33:554-557.
9. Aztecan A., Menniti A., Kang S., Elimelech M., Morgenroth E., Mayes A.M. Antifouling nanofiltration membranes for membrane bioreactors from self-assembling graft copolymers. J Mem. Sci 2006, 285:81-89.
10. Kyllonen H.M., Pirkonen P., Nyström M. Membrane filtration enhanced by ultrasound: a review. Desalination 2005, 181:319-335.
11. Muthukumaran S., Kentish S.E., Stevens G.W., Ashokkumar M. Application of ultrasound in membrane separation processes: a review. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2011, 22:155-194.
12. Feng D., van Deventer J.S.J., Aldrich C. Ultrasonic defouling of reverse osmosis membranes used to treat wastewater effluents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 50:318-323.
13. Muthukumaran S., Kentish S.E., Ashokkumar M., Stevens G.W. Mechanisms for the ultrasonic enhancement of dairy whey ultrafiltration. J Mem. Sci. 2005, 258:106-114.
14. Tarleton E.S., Wakeman T.J. Electro-acoustic cross flow microfiltration. Filtr. Sep. 1992, 29:425-432.
15. Chai X., Kobayashi T., Fujii N. Ultrasound effect on cross-flow filtration of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes. J Mem. Sci. 1998, 148:129-135.
16. Alegria A.E., Lion Y., Kondo T., Riesz P. Sonolysis of aqueous surfactant solutions: probing the interfacial region of cavitation bubbles by spin trapping. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93:4908-4913.
17. Fersi C., Gzara L., Dhahbi M. Flux decline study for textile wastewater treatment by membrane processes. Desalination 2009, 244:321-332.
18. Simon A., Gondrexon N., Taha S., Cabon J., Dorange G. Low frequency ultrasound to improve dead-end ultrafiltration performance. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2000, 35:2619-2637.
19. APHA.American Public Health Association Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-Water 2005, (Washington, D.C.). L.S. Clesceri, A.E. Greenberg, A.D. Eaton (Eds.).
20. Ensminger D. Ultrasonics: Fundamentals, Technology. Applications 1988, Marcel Dekker, New York, (Chapter 11). 2nd Edition.
21. Adewuyi Y.G. Sonochemistry: environmental science and engineering applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40:4681-4715.
22. Muthukumaran S., Yang K., Seuren A., Kentish S., Ashokkumar M., Stevens G.W., Grieser F. The use of ultrasonic cleaning for ultrafiltration membranes in the dairy industry. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 39:99-107.
23. Leighton T.G. The Acoustic Bubble 1994, Academic Press, San Diego.
24. Muralidhara H.S., Senapati N., Ensminger D., Chauhan S.P. Proc. 4th World Filtration Congress, Ostend, Belgium, 22-25 April 1986.
25. Yu S., Liu M., Ma M., Qi M., Lü Z., Gao C. Impacts of membrane properties on reactive dye removal from dye/salt mixtures by asymmetric cellulose acetate and composite polyamide nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 350:83-91.
26. Al-Aseeri M., Bu-Ali Q., Haji S., Al-Bastaki N. Removal of Acid Red and sodium chloride mixtures from aqueous solutions using nanofiltration. Desalination 2007, 206:407-413.
27. Avlonitis S.A., Poulios I., Sotiriou D., Pappas M., Moutesidis K. Simulated cotton dye effluents treatment and reuse by nanofiltration. Desalination 2008, 221:259-267.
28. Scholz W., Lucas M. Techno-economic evaluation of membrane filtration for the recovery and re-use of tanning chemicals. Water Res. 2003, 37:1859-1867.
29. Maheswari G.P., Al-Ramadhan, Al-Abdulhadi M. Energy requirement of water production in dual-purpose plants. Desalination 1995, 101:133-140.
30. Masselin I., Chasseray X., Durand-Bourlier L., Laine J.-M., Syzaret P.-Y., Lemordant D. Effect of sonication on polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 181:213-220.