Being transparent or spinning the message? An experiment into the effects of varying message content on trust in government

Information Polity

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 35-50

  Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

experiments; policy transparency; spin; trust in government; Websites

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886999217     PISSN: 15701255     EISSN: 18758754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/IP-2011-0222     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. P.J. Birkinshaw, Freedom of information and openness, fundamental human rights, Administrative Law Review 58(1) (2006), 177-218.
2. R. Blendon, J. Benson, R. Morin, D. Altman, M. Brodie, M. Brossard and M. James, Changing Attitudes in America, in: Why People Don't Trust Government, J. Nye, P. Zelikow and D. King, eds, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1997, pp. 205-216.
3. D. Bok, Measuring the Performance of Government, in: Why People Don't Trust Government, J. Nye, P. Zelikow and D. King, eds, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1997, pp. 55-75.
4. M.A.P. Bovens, De Digitale Republiek: Democratie en rechtsstaat in de informatiemaatschappij, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2003.
5. B. Bozeman and P. Scott, Laboratory Experiments in Public Policy and Management, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2(3) (1992), 293-313.
6. G.D. Brin, The Transparent Society: will privacy force use to choose between privacy and freedom? Perseus, Reading MA, 1998.
7. T.E. Cook and P. Gronke, The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions, The Journal of Politics 67(3) (2005), 784-803. (Pubitemid 41638737)
8. F.L. Cook, L.R. Jacobs and D. Kim, Trusting What You Know: Information, Knowledge, and Confidence in Social Security, The Journal of Politics 72(2) (2010), 397-412.
9. D. Curtin and A.J. Meijer, Does Transparency Strengthen Legitimacy? Information polity 11(2) (2006), 109-123.
10. R. Dalton, Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices. The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
11. Th. Davenport, Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology, Boston: Harvard School Press, 1993.
12. R. Davis, The Web of politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System, Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
13. C.C. Demchak, C.F. Friis and T.M. La Porte, Reflections on Configuring Public Agencies in Cyberspace: A Conceptual Investigation, In: Public Administration in an Information Age: A Handbook, I.T.M. Snellen and W.B.H.J. van de Donk, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2001, pp. 225-244
14. J.A.G.M. van Dijk, O. Peters and W. Ebbers, Explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands, Government Information Quarterly 25(3) (2008), 379-399.
15. C.H. Drew and T.L. Nyerges, Transparency of environmental decision making: A case study of soil cleanup inside the Hanford 100 area, Journal of Risk Research 7(1) (2004), 33-71.
16. A. Etzioni, Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant? The Journal of Political Philosophy (2010), early view (not yet indexed).
17. A. Florini, Introduction: the battle over transparency, in: The Right to Know. Transparency for an Open World, A. Florini, ed., Colombia University Press, New York, NY, 2007, pp. 1-16.
18. F. Fukuyama, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1995.
19. J. Gerring and S.C. Thacker, Political Institutions and Corruption: The Role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism, British Journal of Political Science 34 (2004), 295-330. (Pubitemid 38482877)
20. I. Gaber, 'Lies, damn lies. . . and political spin', British Journalism Review 11(1) (2000), 60-70.
21. S.G. Grimmelikhuijsen and E.W. Welch, A theoretical framework for government transparency. Factors affecting disclosure of environmental information of local governments in the Netherlands, paper presented at the annual EGPA conference, Toulouse, September 7-9, 2010.
22. D. Heald, Varieties of Transparency, in: Transparency, The Key to Better Governance? C. Hood and D. Heald, eds, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 25-43.
23. M.J. Hetherington, The Political Relevance of Political Trust, The American Political Science Review 92(4) (1998), 791-808. (Pubitemid 128185279)
24. J.R. Hibbing and E. TheissMoore, Stealth Democracy. American's Beliefs about How Government Should Work, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
25. J.R. Hibbing and E. TheissMoore, Congress as Public Enemy. Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
26. C. Hood, Beyond Exchanging First Principles? Some Closing Comments, in: Transparency, The Key to Better Governance? C. Hood and D. Heald, eds, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 211-226.
27. R. Inglehart, Trust, wellbeing and democracy, in: Democracy and trust, M.E. Warren, ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 88-120.
28. S.L., Jarvenpaa, K. Knoll and D.E. Leidner, Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams, Journal of Management Information Systems 14(4) (1998), 29-64.
29. S. Kim, The Role of Trust in the Modern Administrative State, An Integrative Model, Administration and Society 37(5) (2005), 611-635. (Pubitemid 41560998)
30. D.C. King, The Polarization of American Parties and Mistrust of Government, in: Why people don't trust government, J.S. Nye, P.D. Zelikow and D.C. King, eds, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997, pp. 155-178.
31. A.M. Kjaer, Governance, Malden, Polity Press, 2004.
32. T.M. La Porte, National Differences in How Governments Use Web Sites, The Internet Connection: Your Guide to Government Resources, 1999.
33. M. Levi and L. Stoker, Political Trust and Trustworthiness, Annual Review of Political Science 3 (2000), 375-507.
34. J. Mahler and P.M. Regan, Crafting the message: Controlling content on agency Web sites, Government Information Quarterly 24(3) (2007), 505-521.
35. H. Margetts, Transparency and Digital Government, in: Transparency, The Key to Better Governance?, C. Hood and D. Heald, eds, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 197-207.
36. R.Mayer, J.H. Davis and D. Schoorman, An IntegrativeModel of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review 20(3) (1995), 709-734.
37. D.H.McKnight, V.Choudhury andC.Kacmar, Developing andValidating TrustMeasures for Ecommerce, An integrative Typology, Information Systems Research 13(3) (2002), 334-359.
38. D.H. McKnight and N.L. Chervany, Reflections on an initial trustbuilding model, in: Handbook of Trust Research, R. Bachman and A. Zaheer, eds, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006, pp. 29-51.
39. A.J. Meijer, Understanding computermediated transparency, International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(2) (2009), 255-269.
40. A.K. Mishra, Organizational Responses to Crisis, The Centrality of Trust, in: Trust in Organizations, Frontiers of theory and Research, R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler, eds, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1996, pp. 261-287.
41. P. Norris, Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
42. O. O'Neill, A Question of Trust, The BBC Reith Lectures 2002, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
43. R.G. Peters, V.T. Covello and D.B. McCallum, The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study, Risk Analysis 17(1) (1997), 43-54.
44. V. Pina, T. Lourdes and S. Royo, Are ICTs Improving Transparency and Accountability in the EU Regional and Local Governments? An Empirical Study, Public Administration 85(2) (2007), 449-472. (Pubitemid 46831295)
45. R. Putnam, Bowling Alone, The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, Simon and Schuster, 2000.
46. S.J. Piotrowski and G.G. Van Ryzin, Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government, The American Review of Public Administration 37(3) (2007), 306-323.
47. J.E. Relly and M. Sabharwal, Perceptions of Transparency of Government Policymaking: A CrossNational Study, Government Information Quarterly 26(1) (2009), 148-157.
48. A. Roberts, Spin Control and Freedom of Information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada, Public Administration 83(1) (2005), 1-23.
49. D.M. Rousseau, S.B. Sitkin, R.S. Burt and C. Camerer, Not so Different after All: A CrossDiscipline View of Trust, The Academy of Management Review 23(3) (1998), 393-404. (Pubitemid 128114429)
50. R. Snell, FOI and the Delivery of Diminishing Returns, or How SpinDoctors and Journalists have Mistreated a Volatile Reform, The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs 2(3) (2002), 187-207.
51. D. Stone, Policy Paradox, the Art of Political Decision Making, WW Norton & Co, 2nd revised edition, 2002.
52. E.W. Welch, E.W. Hinnant and M.J. Moon, Linking Citizen Satisfaction with Egovernment and trust in government, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3) (2005), 371-391. (Pubitemid 41350834)
53. B. Worthy, More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 23(4) (2010), 561-582.