A translation table for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: Guidance to improve the value of research for clinical and health policy decision-making

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 259-262

  Tunis, Sean R ^a   Messner, Donna A ^a   Mohr, Penny ^a   Gliklich, Richard E ^b   Dubois, Robert W ^c  

^a Center for Medical Technology Policy   (United States)

^b IQVIA   (United States)

^c National Pharamceutical Council   (United States)

Author keywords

comparative effectiveness research; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; patient centered outcomes research; Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute; research methods; stakeholders; translation table

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EVALUATION RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; TREATMENT PLANNING;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84886943943     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.12.22     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 290, 1624-1632 (2003).
2. Wilensky GR. Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information. Health Aff. (Millwood) 25(6), w572-w585 (2006).
3. Orszag PR. Congressional Budget Office Testimony. Research on the Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Treatments: Options for an Expanded Federal Role. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC, USA (2007).
4. Teutsch SM, Berger ML, Weinstein MC. Comparative effectiveness: asking the right questions, choosing the right method. Health Aff. (Millwood) 24(1), 128-132 (2005).
5. Rawlins M. De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions. Lancet 372(9656), 2152-2161 (2008).
6. Tunis SR, Benner J, McClellan M. Comparative effectiveness research: policy context, methods development and research infrastructure. Stat. Med. 29(19), 1963-1976 (2010).
7. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH. Building useful evidence: changing the clinical research paradigm to account for comparative effectiveness research. J. Compar. Effect. Res. 1(3), 263-270 (2012).
8. Montori VM, Kim SP, Guyatt GH, Shah ND. Which design for which question- An exploration toward a translation table for comparative effectiveness research. J. Compar. Effect. Res. 1(3), 271-279 (2012).
9. Gliklich RE, Leavy MB, Velentgas P et al. Incorporating stakeholder perspectives in developing a translation table framework for comparative effectiveness research. J. Compar. Effect. Res. 1(3), 281-292 (2012).
10. Rawlins MD. Comparative effectiveness research: a view from the other side of the pond. J. Compar. Effect. Res. 1(3), 293-295 (2012).