Dissemination and implementation of comparative effectiveness evidence: Key informant interviews with Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 185-194

  Morrato, Elaine H ^a   Concannon, Thomas W ^b   Meissner, Paul ^c,d   Shah, Nilay D ^e   Turner, Barbara J ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

comparative effectiveness research; dissemination; implementation; NIH

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH DISPARITY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84886943507     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.13.10     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Balas EA. From appropriate care to evidence-based medicine. Pediatr. Ann. 27(9), 581-584 (1998). (Pubitemid 28447617)
2. Timmermans S, Mauck A. The promises and pitfalls of evidence-based medicine. Health Aff. (Millwood) 24(1), 18-28 (2005). (Pubitemid 40169771)
3. Brownson RC, Kreuter MW, Arrington BA, True WR. Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward? Public Health Rep. 121(1), 97-103 (2006). (Pubitemid 43200193)
4. Committee on Identifying Priority Areas for Quality Improvement and Board on Health Care Services. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. Adams K, Corrigan J (Eds). Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington DC, USA (2003).
5. Institute of Medicine. Learning What Works: Infrastructure Required for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA (2011).
6. Sox HC, Greenfield S. Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(3), 203-205 (2009).
7. Conway PH, Clancy C. Comparative-effectiveness research-implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's report. N. Engl. J. Med. 361(4), 328-330 (2009).
8. Conway PH, Clancy C. Charting a path from comparative effectiveness funding to improved patient-centered health care. JAMA 303(10), 985-986 (2010).
9. Benner JS, Morrison MR, Karnes EK, Kocot SL, Mcclellan M. An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: priorities, gaps, and next steps. Health Aff. (Millwood) 29(10), 1768-1776 (2010).
10. Garber AM. How The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute can best influence real-world health care decision making. Health Aff. (Millwood) 30(12), 2243-2251 (2011).
11. Collins FS. Reengineering translational science: the time is right. Sci. Transl. Med. 3(90), 90cm17 (2011).
12. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations (5th Edition). Free Press, NY, USA (2003).
13. Solberg LI, Glasgow RE, Unutzer J et al. Partnership research: a practical trial design for evaluation of a natural experiment to improve depression care. Med. Care 48(7), 576-582 (2010).
14. Shah ND, Mullan RJ, Breslin M, Yawn BP, Ting HH, Montori VM. Translating comparative effectiveness into practice: the case of diabetes medications. Med. Care 48(Suppl. 6), S153-S158 (2010).
15. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N. Engl. J. Med. 355(26), 2725-2732 (2006). (Pubitemid 46021509)
16. Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Harnessing the potential of health care collaboratives: lessons from the Keystone ICU project. In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML (Eds). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA (2008).
17. Schoen MJ, Tipton EF, Houston TK et al. Characteristics that predict physician participation in a web-based CME activity: the MI-Plus study. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 29(4), 246-253 (2009).
18. Levine DA, Funkhouser EM, Houston TK et al. Improving care after myocardial infarction using a 2-year internet-delivered intervention: the Department of Veterans Affairs myocardial infarction-plus cluster-randomized trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 171(21), 1910-1917 (2011).
19. Michener L, Cook J, Ahmed SM, Yonas MA, Coyne-Beasley T, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. Aligning the goals of community-engaged research: why and how academic health centers can successfully engage with communities to improve health. Acad. Med. 87(3), 285-291 (2012).
20. Timbie JW, Schneider EC, Van Busum K, Fox DS. Five reasons that many comparative effectiveness studies fail to change patient care and clinical practice. Health Aff. (Millwood) 31(10), 2168-2175 (2012).
21. Luce BR, Drummond MF, Dubois RW et al. Principles for planning and conducting comparative effectiveness research. J. Compar. Effect. Res. 1(5), 431-440 (2012).
22. Wilensky GR. Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information. Health Aff. (Millwood) 25(6), w572-w585 (2006). (Pubitemid 44871704)
23. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am. J. Public Health 102(7), 1274-1281 (2012).
24. Grumbach K, Mold JW. A health care cooperative extension service: transforming primary care and community health. JAMA 301(24), 2589-2591 (2009).
25. Bonham AC, Solomon MZ. Moving comparative effectiveness research into practice: implementation science and the role of academic medicine. Health Aff. (Millwood) 29(10), 1901-1905 (2010).
26. Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27(8), 985-991 (2012).
27. Woolf SH. Society's choice: the tradeoff between efficacy and equity and the lives at stake. Am. J. Prev. Med. 27(1), 49-56 (2004). (Pubitemid 38813184)
28. Giacomini M, Cook D. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 284(3), 357-362 (2000). (Pubitemid 30469863)