Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 92, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1256-1263

  Studsgaard, Anne ^a   Skorstengaard, Malene ^a   Glavind, Julie ^a   Hvidman, Lone ^a   Uldbjerg, Niels ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

adverse neonatal outcome; elective repeat cesarean delivery; mode of delivery; Trial of labor after cesarean; uterine rupture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; EMERGENCY SURGERY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; STILLBIRTH; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADVERSE NEONATAL OUTCOME; ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN DELIVERY; MODE OF DELIVERY; TRIAL OF LABOR AFTER CESAREAN; UTERINE RUPTURE;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LOGISTIC MODELS; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84886924652     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12240     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bujold E, Hammoud AO, Hendler I, Berman S, Blackwell SC, Duperron L, et al. Trial of labor in patients with a previous cesarean section: does maternal age influence the outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 1113-8.
2. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 1016-23.
3. Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G,. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 824-30.
4. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP,. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 3-8.
5. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 2581-9.
6. Stamilio DM, DeFranco E, Pare E, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Allsworth JE, et al. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1075-82.
7. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 12-20.
8. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010; 191: 1-397.
9. Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Hashima J, Kraemer DF, Eden KB, Berlin M, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2003; 71: 1-8.
10. Gilbert SA, Grobman WA, Landon MB, Spong CY, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, et al. Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 311.e1-9.
11. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D,. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4): CD004224.
12. Dodd J, Pearce E, Crowther C,. Women's experiences and preferences following Caesarean birth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 44: 521-4.
13. Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS,; Birth After Caesarean Study Group. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2012; 9: e1001192.
14. Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R,. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA. 2002; 287: 2684-90.
15. Hoskins IA, Gomez JL,. Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 591-3.
16. Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, Te C, Karrison T, Ismail MA,. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 1365-71; discussion 1371-3.
17. Bujold E, Goyet M, Marcoux S, Brassard N, Cormier B, Hamilton E, et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 43-50.
18. Fitzpatrick KE, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, Knight M,. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS Med. 2012; 9: e1001184.
19. Roberge S, Chaillet N, Boutin A, Moore L, Jastrow N, Brassard N, et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011; 115: 5-10.
20. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199:30.e1- 30.e1-5.
21. Robson MS,. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 15: 179-94.
22. Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK,. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1187-97.
23. Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP,. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 66: 89-92.