Clinical application of controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in a higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA)-volumetric interpolated breathhold (VIBE) sequence for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1020-1026

  Yu, Mi Hye ^a   Lee, Jeong Min ^a,b   Yoon, Jeong Hee ^a   Kiefer, Berthold ^c   Han, Joon Koo ^a,b   Choi, Byung Ihn ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA); Gadoxetic acid enhanced liver MR; high resolution; imaging; T1 weighted gradient echo (GRE); three dimensional (3D); volumetric interpolated breathhold examination (VIBE)

Indexed keywords

GADOXETIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED ALIASING IN PARALLEL IMAGING RESULTS IN HIGHER ACCELERATION TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; LIVER BLOOD VESSEL; LIVER INJURY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CONTROLLED ALIASING IN PARALLEL IMAGING RESULTS IN HIGHER ACCELERATION (CAIPIRINHA); GADOXETIC ACID-ENHANCED LIVER MR; HIGH-RESOLUTION; IMAGING; T1-WEIGHTED GRADIENT-ECHO (GRE); THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D); VOLUMETRIC INTERPOLATED BREATHHOLD EXAMINATION (VIBE);

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BREATH HOLDING; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIVER DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886853766     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24088     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Maniam S, Szklaruk J,. Magnetic resonance imaging: review of imaging techniques and overview of liver imaging. World J Radiol 2010; 2: 309-322.
2. Ba-Ssalamah A, Baroud S, Bastati N, Qayyum A,. MR imaging of benign focal liver lesions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 2010; 18: 403-419, ix.
3. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999; 212: 876-884.
4. Kim MJ, Mitchell DG, Ito K, Kim PN,. Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of 2D and 3D gradient echo techniques. Abdom imaging 2001; 26: 269-276.
5. Kim YK, Kim CS, Han YM, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging versus multi-detector row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33: 844.
6. Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO,. MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007; 6: 43-52.
7. Akai H, Kiryu S, Matsuda I, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI: comparison with triple phase 64 detector row helical CT. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 310-315.
8. Kim YK, Park G, Kim CS, Yu HC, Han YM,. Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the detection and characterisation of liver metastases: comparison with multidetector-row CT. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 539-547.
9. Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 195: 785-792.
10. Reimer P, Rummeny EJ, Shamsi K, et al. Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. Radiology 1996; 199: 177-183.
11. Vogl TJ, Kummel S, Hammerstingl R, et al. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1996; 200: 59-67.
12. Ahn SS, Kim MJ, Lim JS, Hong HS, Chung YE, Choi JY,. Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2010; 255: 459-466.
13. Wile GE, Leyendecker JR,. Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: sequence optimization and artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 2010; 18: 525.
14. McKenzie CA, Lim D, Ransil BJ, et al. Shortening MR image acquisition time for volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination with a recently developed parallel imaging reconstruction technique: clinical feasibility. Radiology 2004; 230: 589-594.
15. Vogt FM, Antoch G, Hunold P, et al. Parallel acquisition techniques for accelerated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen: assessment of image quality and lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21: 376-382.
16. Breuer FA, Blaimer M, Heidemann RM, Mueller MF, Griswold MA, Jakob PM,. Controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) for multi-slice imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 684-691.
17. Breuer FA, Blaimer M, Mueller MF, et al. Controlled aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA). Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 549-556.
18. Herédia V, Ramalho M, de Campos ROP, et al. Comparison of a single shot T1-weighted in-and out-of-phase magnetization prepared gradient recalled echo with a standard two-dimensional gradient recalled echo: preliminary findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 1482-1490.
19. Zech CJ, Vos B, Nordell A, et al. Vascular enhancement in early dynamic liver MR imaging in an animal model: comparison of two injection regimen and two different doses Gd-EOB-DTPA (gadoxetic acid) with standard Gd-DTPA. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 305-310.
20. Sun HY, Lee JM, Shin CI, et al. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (< or =2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging. Invest Radiol 2010; 45: 96-103.
21. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P,. 2D SENSE for faster 3D MRI. MAGMA 2002; 14: 10-19.
22. Wu B, Millane RP, Watts R, Bones PJ,. Improved matrix inversion in image plane parallel MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 27: 942-953.
23. Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP,. MR artifacts, safety, and quality control: 1. Radiographics 2006; 26: 275-297.
24. Glockner JF, Hu HH, Stanley DW, Angelos L, King K,. Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide: 1. Radiographics 2005; 25: 1279-1297.
25. Yang RK, Roth CG, Ward RJ, Mitchell DG,. Optimizing abdominal MR imaging: approaches to common problems: 1. Radiographics 2010; 30: 185-199.
26. Deshmane A, Gulani V, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N,. Parallel MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 55-72.
27. Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO,. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 375-385.
28. Asbach P, Warmuth C, Stemmer A, et al. High spatial resolution T1-weighted MR imaging of liver and biliary tract during uptake phase of a hepatocyte-specific contrast medium. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 809-815.