|
Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 269-276
|
Hepatic MR imaging: Comparison of 2D and 3D gradient echo techniques
a a a a |
Author keywords
Liver; Liver, MR; MR, pulse sequence
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
FEMALE;
HEPATOGRAPHY;
HUMAN;
IMAGE QUALITY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LIVER TUMOR;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS;
SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;
SPLEEN;
THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
EVALUATION STUDIES;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
LIVER;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
|
EID: 0035004802
PISSN: 09428925
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s002610000177 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (33)
|
References (18)
|