Efficacy evaluation of treating cervical spondylopathy with the Discover artificial cervical disc prosthesis

National Medical Journal of China

Volumn 93, Issue 37, 2013, Pages 2965-2968

  Fang, Li Ming ^a   Zhang, Ya Jun ^a   Zhang, Jun ^a   Li, Qin ^b  

^a Second Hospital of Beijing Municipal Corps   (China)

^b Beijing Jishuitan Hospital   (China)

Author keywords

Bioartificial organs; Cervical spondylosis; Intervertebral disk; Postoperative complications

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DISK PROSTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION SCORE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADICULOPATHY; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL OSTEOPHYTOSIS; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84886740886     PISSN: 03762491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.37.013     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hilibrand A S, Carlson G D, Palumbo M A, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999, 81: 519-528.
2. Hilibrand A S, Bobbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J, 2004, 4 Suppl6: 190-194.
3. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine, 1999, 24: 670-675.
4. Peng C W, Quirnoa M, Bendo J A, et al. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Spine J, 2009, 9: 551-555.
5. Auerbach J D, Jones K J, Fras C I, et al. The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J, 2008, 8: 711-716.
6. Yi S, Shin H C, Kim K N, et al. Modified techniques to prevent sagittal imbalance after cervical arthroplasty. Spine, 2007, 32: 1986-1991.
7. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine, 1993, 18: 2167-2173.
8. DePalma A F, Rothman R H, Lewinnek G E, et al. Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1972, 134: 755-758.
9. Gore D R, Sepic S B. Anterior cervical fusion ior degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients. Spine, 1984, 9: 667-671.
10. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J, 2009, 9: 275-286.
11. Goflin J. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine, 2003, 28: 2673-2678.
12. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery, 2002, 51: 840-845.
13. Kim S W, Limson M A, Kim S B, et al. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18: 218-231.
14. Yang S H, Wu X H, Hu Y, et al. Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Spine, 2008, 33: 371-377.
15. Odom G L, Finney W, Woodhall B. Cervical disc lesions. JAMA, 1958, 166: 23-28.
16. Sahoo P K, Bhatoe H S. Cervical disc replacement for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. MJAFI, 2006, 62: 112-115.
17. Rabin D, Bertagnoli R, Wharton N, et al. Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an invivo study with ProDisc-C. Spine J, 2009, 9: 129-133.