Benzene adsorption at the aqueous (0 1 1) α-quartz interface: Is surface flexibility important?

Molecular Simulation

Volumn 39, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 1093-1102

  Wright, Louise B ^a   Freeman, Colin L ^b   Walsh, Tiffany R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

adsorption; interfaces; molecular simulation; potential of mean force

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID PHENYLALANINE; ATOMISTIC SIMULATIONS; FREE ENERGY OF ADSORPTION; INORGANIC SUBSTRATES; MOLECULAR ADSORPTION; MOLECULAR SIMULATIONS; POTENTIAL OF MEAN FORCE; STRUCTURAL MODELING;

ADSORBATES; ADSORPTION; AMINO ACIDS; BENZENE; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; BIOMIMETIC PROCESSES; FREE ENERGY; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); QUARTZ; SURFACES;

PHASE INTERFACES;

EID: 84886697563     PISSN: 08927022     EISSN: 10290435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2013.796589     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Herzbach D, Binder K, Muser MH. Comparison of model potentials for molecular-dynamics simulations of silica. J Chem Phys. 2005;123:124711.
2. Lopes PEM, Murashov V, Tazi M, Demchuk E, MacKerell AD. Development of an empirical force field for silica. Application to the quartz-water interface. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:2782-2792.
3. Hassanali AA, Singer SJ. Static and dynamic properties of the water/amorphous silica ineterface: a model for the undissociated surface. J Comput Aided Mater Des. 2007;14:53-63.
4. Cole DJ, Payne MC, Csanyi G, Spearing SM, Ciacchi LC. Development of a classical force field for the oxidized Si surface: application to hydrophilic water bonding. J Chem Phys. 2007;127: 204704.
5. Heinz H, Vaia RA, Farmer BL, Naik RR. Accurate simulation of surfaces and interfaces of face-centered cubic metals using 12-6 and 9-6 Lennard-Jones potentials. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112: 17281-17290.
6. Raiteri P, Gale JD, Quigley D, Rodger PM. Derivation of an accurate force-field for simulating the growth of calcium carbonate from aqueous solution: a new model for the calcite-water interface. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:5997-6010.
7. Hassanali AA, Zhang H, Knight C, Shin YK, Singer SJ. The dissociated amorphous silica surface: model development and evaluation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6:3456-3471.
8. Schneider J, Colombi Ciacchi L. A classical potential to model the adsorption of biological molecules on oxidized titanium surfaces. J Chem Theory Comput. 2011;7:473-484.
9. Patwardhan SV, Emami FS, Berry RJ, Jones SE, Naik RR, Deschaume O, Heinz H, Perry CC. Chemistry of aqueous silica nanoparticle surfaces and the mechanism of selective peptide adsorption. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;143:6244-6256.
10. Hill JR, Sauer J. Molecular mechanics potential for silica and zeolite catalysts based on ab-initio calculations. 1. Dense and microporous silica. J Phys Chem. 1994;98:1238-1244.
11. Brodka A, Zerda TW. Properties of liquid acetone in silica pores: molecular dynamics simulation. J Chem Phys. 1996;104: 6319-6326.
12. Argyris D, Cole DR, Striolo A. Dynamic behaviour of interfacial water at the silica surface. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113: 19591-19600.
13. Cygan RT, Liang JJ, Kalinichev AG. Molecular models of hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, and clay phases and the development of a general force field. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:1255-1266.
14. Predota M, Bandura AV, Cummings PT, Kubicki JD, Wesolowski DJ, Chialvo AA, Machesky ML. 1. Structure of surfaces and interfacial water from molecular dynamics by use of ab initio potentials. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:12049-12060.
15. Cruz-Chu ER, Aksimentiev A, Schulten K. Water-silica force field for simulating nanodevices. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110: 21497-21508.
16. Tomasio SD, Walsh TR. Atomistic modelling of the interaction between peptides and carbon nanotubes. Mol Phys. 2007;105: 221-229.
17. Iori F, Felice D, Molinari E, Corni S. GolP: an atomistic force-field to describe the interaction of proteins with Au(111) surfaces in water. J Comput Chem. 2009;30:1465-1476.
18. Lorenz CD, Crozier PS, Anderson JA, Travesset A. Molecular dynamics of ionic transport and electrokinetic effects in realistic silica channels. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:10222-10323.
19. Butenuth A, Moras G, Schneider J, Koleini M, Köppen S, Meissner R, Wright LB, Walsh TR, Colombi Ciacchi L. Ab initio derived force-field parameters for molecular dynamics simulations of deprotonated amorphous-SiO2/water interfaces. Phys Status Solidi B. 2012;249:292-305.
20. Wright LB, Rodger PM, Corni S, Walsh TR. GolP-CHARMM: first-principles based force-fields for the interaction of proteins with Au(111) and Au(100). J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9:1616-1630.
21. Skelton AA, Wesolowski DJ, Cummings PT. Investigating the quartz (10(1)over-bar0)/water interface using classical and ab initio molecular dynamics. Langmuir. 2011;27:8700-8709.
22. Skelton AA, Fenter P, Kubicki JD, Wesolowski DJ, Cummings PT. Simulations of the quartz(10(1)over-bar1)/water interface: a comparison of classical force fields, ab initio molecular dynamics, and X-ray reflectivity experiments. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115: 2076-2088.
23. Ho TA, Argyris D, Papvassiliou CV, Striolo A, Lee LL, Cole DR. Interfacial water on crystalline silica: a comparative molecular dynamics simulation study. Mol Simulat. 2011;37:172-195.
24. Phan A, Ho TA, Cole DR, Striolo A. Molecular structure and dynamics in thin water films at metal oxide surfaces: magnesium, aluminum, and silicon oxide. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116: 15962-15973.
25. Forrey C, Douglas JF, Gibson MK. The fundamental role of flexibility on the strength of molecular binding. Soft Matter. 2012;8: 6385-6392.
26. Seeman NC, Belcher AM. Emulating biology: building nanostructures from the bottom up. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99: 6451-6455.
27. Evans JS, Samudrala R, Walsh TR, Oren EE, Tamerler C. Molecular design of inorganic-binding polypeptides. MRS Bull. 2008;33: 514-518.
28. Tamerler C, Khatayevich D, Gungormus M, Kacar T, Oren EE, Hnilova M, Sarikaya M. Molecular biomimetics: GEPI-based biological routes to technology. Biopolymers. 2010;94:78-94.
29. Briggs BD, Knecht MR. Nanotechnology meets biology: peptide-based methods for the fabrication of functional materials. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:405-418.
30. Hnilova M, So CR, Oren EE, Wilson BR, Kacar T, Tamerler C, Sarikaya M. Peptide-directed co-assembly of nanoprobes on mutlimaterial patterned solid surfaces. Soft Matter. 2012;8: 4327-4334.
31. Mirau PA, Naik RR, Gehring P. Structure of peptides on metal oxide surfaces probed by NMR. J AmChem Soc. 2011;133:18243-18248.
32. Ju S, Yeo WS. Quantification of proteins on gold nanoparticles by combining MALDI-TOF MS and proteolysis. Nanotechnology. 2012;23:135701.
33. Wright LB, Walsh TR. Facet selectivity of binding on quartz surfaces: free energy calculations of amino-acid analogue adsorption. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:2933-2945.
34. Wright LB, Walsh TR. First-principles molecular dynamics simulations of NH+ 4 and CH3COO2 adsorption at the aqueous quartz interface. J Chem Phys. 2012;137:224702-1-224702-8.
35. Wright LB, Walsh TR. Efficient conformational sampling of peptides adsorbed onto inorganic surfaces: insights from a quartz binding peptide. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15:4715-4726.
36. Oren EE, Notman R, Kim IW, Evans JS, Walsh TR, Samudrala R, Tamerler C, Sarikaya M. Probing the molecular mechanisms of quartz-binding peptides. Langmuir. 2010;26:11003-11009.
37. Leuty GM, Tsige M. Structure and dynamics of tetrahalomethane adsorption on (0 0 1) surfaces of graphite and alpha-quartz. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:13970-13981.
38. Argyris D, Cole DR, Striolo A. Hydration structure on crystalline silica substrates. Langmuir. 2009;25:8025-8035.
39. Notman R, Walsh TR. Molecular dynamics studies of the interactions of water and amino acid analogues with quartz surfaces. Langmuir. 2009;25:1638-1644.
40. Lindahl E, Hess B, Spoelvan D. der, GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model. 2001;7: 306-317.
41. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modelling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102:3586-3616.
42. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79:926-935.
43. Neria E, Fischer S, Karplus M. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 1996;105:1902-1921.
44. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA. SETTLE: an analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithms for rigid water models. J Comput Chem. 1992;13:952-962.
45. Nosé S. A molecular-dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol Phys. 1984;52:255-268.
46. Hoover WG. Canonical dynamics-equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A. 1985;31:1695-1697.
47. Hockney RW, Goel SP, Eastwood J. Quiet high-resolution computer models of a plasma. J Comput Phys. 1974;14:148-158.
48. Parrinello M, Rahman A. Polymorphic transitions in singlecrystals-a new molecular-dynamics method. J Appl Phys. 1981;52:7182-7190.
49. Nosé S, Klein ML. Constant pressure molecular-dynamics for molecular-systems. Mol Phys. 1983;50:1055-1076.
50. Hess B. Determining the shear viscosity of model liquids from molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys. 2002;116:209-217.
51. Shim Y, Jeong D, Choi MY, Kim HJ. Rotational dynamics of a diatomic solute in the room-temperature ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate. J Chem Phys. 2006;125: 061102.
52. Skelton AA, Liang TN, Walsh TR. Interplay of sequence, conformation, and binding at the peptide-titania interface as mediated by water. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2009;1:1482-1491.
53. Jena KC, Hore DK. Water structure at solid surfaces and its implications for biomolecule adsorption. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:14383-14404.
54. Schneider J, Colombi Ciacchi L. Specific material recognition by small peptides mediated by the interfacial solvent structure. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:2407-2413.
55. Vellore NA, Yancey JA, Collier G, Latour RA, Stuart SJ. Assessment of the transferability of a protein force field for the simulation of peptide-surface interactions. Langmuir. 2010;26: 7396-7404.
56. Yancey JA, Vellore NA, Collier G, Stuart SJ, Latour RA. Development of molecular simulation methods to accurately represent protein-surface interactions: the effect of pressure and its determination for a system with constrained atoms. Biointerphases. 2010;5:85-94.
57. Collier G, Vellore NA, Yancey JA, Stuart SJ, Latour RA. Comparison between empirical protein force field for the simulation of the adsorption behavior of structures LK peptides on functionalized surfaces. Biointerphases. 2012;7:1-19.