Designing and evaluating representations to model pedagogy

Research in Learning Technology

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages

  Masterman, Elizabeth ^a   Craft, Brock ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epistemic efficacy; Evaluation; Learning Design; Representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886665190     PISSN: 21567069     EISSN: 21567077     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20205     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agostinho, S. (2006) 'The use of a visual learning design representation to document and communicate teaching ideas', ascilite 2006, Who's learning? Whose technology, Sydney, pp. 3-8.
2. Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R., (eds) (2007) Rethinking Pedagogy for the Digital Age, 1st edn, Routledge, London.
3. Charlton, P., Magoulas, G. & Laurillard, D. (2012) 'Enabling creative learning design through semantic technologies', Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 231-253.
4. Cheng, P. C.-H. (1996) 'Problem solving and learning with diagrammatic representations in physics', in Forms of Representation: An interdisciplinary theme for Cognitive Science, ed. D. Peterson, Intellect, Exeter, UK, pp. 47-66.
5. Conole, G. (2013) Designing for Learning in an Open World, Springer, New York.
6. Dalziel, J. R. (2003) 'Implementing learning design: the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS)', ascilite 2003, 'Interact, Integrate, Impact', Adelaide, Australia.
7. Falconer, I. & Littlejohn, A. (2009) 'Representing models of practicé, in Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications, and Technologies (vol. 1), eds L. Lockyer, et al., Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA, pp. 20-40.
8. Larkin, J. H. & Simon, H. A. (1987) 'Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words', Cognitive Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65-100.
9. Laurillard, D. (2002) Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies, 2nd edn, RoutledgeFalmer, London.
10. Laurillard, D., et al., (2013) 'A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs', Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 15-30.
11. Masterman, E. (2004) Representation, Mediation, Conversation: Integrating Socio-Cultural and Cognitive Perspectives in the Design of a Learning Technology Artefact for Reasoning about Historical Causation. Doctoral Thesis ., University of Birmingham.
12. Masterman, E. (2009) 'Activity theory and the design of pedagogic planning tools', in Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications, and Technologies (vol. 1), eds L. Lockyer, et al., Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA, pp. 209-227.
13. Masterman, E. & Manton, M. (2011) 'Teachers' perspectives on digital tools for pedagogic planning and design', Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 227-246.
14. Masterman, L. (2013) 'The challenge of teachers' design practicé, in Rethinking Pedagogy for the Digital Age, 2nd edn, eds H. Beetham & R. Sharpe, Routledge, London, pp. 64-77.
15. Norman, D. A. (1993) Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
16. Peterson, D., (ed) (1996) Forms of Representation: An interdisciplinary theme for Cognitive Science, Intellect, Exeter, UK.
17. Reusser, K. (1992) 'Tutoring systems and pedagogical theory: representational tools for understanding, planning, and reflection in problem solving', in Computers as Cognitive Tools, eds S. Lajoie & S. Derry, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 143-177.
18. Rogers, Y. & Scaife, M. (1998) 'How can interactive multimedia facilitate learning?', in Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces: Research and Applications, ed. J. Lee, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.
19. San Diego, J. P., et al., (2007) 'The feasibility of modelling lecturers' approaches to learning design', ALT-J, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15-29.
20. Stenning, K. & Oberlander, J. (1995) 'A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation', Cognitive Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 97-140.