Direct Contra Naïve-Indirect Comparison of Clinical Failure Rates between High-Viscosity GIC and Conventional Amalgam Restorations: An Empirical Study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Mickenautsch, Steffen ^a   Yengopal, Veerasamy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ERROR; HUMAN; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL SURGERY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; VISCOSITY;

AMALGAM; GLASS IONOMER;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84886618618     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078397     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Frencken JE, Van't Hof MA, Van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ, (2004) Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: A meta-analysis. J Dent Res 83: 120-123.
2. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, et al. (2000) Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 79: 709-771.
3. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Leal SC, Oliveira LB, Bezerra AC, et al. (2009) Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: A meta- analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent 10: 41-46.
4. Ericson D, Kidd EAM, McComb D, Mjor I, Noack MJ, (2003) Minimally invasive dentistry-concept and techniques in cariology. Oral Health Prev Dent 1: 59-72.
5. Fuks AB, (2002) The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 24: 448-455.
6. Carvalho CA, Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Ferrari M, Navarro MF, (2007) Influence of ultrasonic setting on microhardness of glass-ionomer cements. Int Dent SA 9: 24-32.
7. Torabzadeh H, Ghasemi A, Shakeri S, Alireza Baghban AA, Razmavar S, (2011) Effect of powder/liquid ratio of glass ionomer cements on flexural and shear bond strengths to dentin. Braz J Oral Sci 10: 204-207.
8. Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer HC, (2001) Laboratory strength of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements. J Prosthodont 10: 140-147.
9. Zahra VN, Kohen SG, Macchi R, (2011) Powder-liquid ratio and properties of two restorative glass ionomer cements. Acta Odontol Latinoam 24: 200-204.
10. Busanello L, Telles M, Miranda WG Jr, Imparato JC, Jacques LB, et al. (2009) Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements used for atraumatic restorative treatment. Rev Odonto Ciênc 24: 295-298.
11. Bresciani E, Barata Tde J, Fagundes TC, Adachi A, Terrin MM, et al. (2004) Compressive and diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci 12: 344-348.
12. Heintze SD, (2007) Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent 9Suppl 1: 77-106.
13. Heintze SD, Zimmerli B, (2011) Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. A review in 3 parts. Part 3: in vitro tests of adhesive systems. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 121: 1024-1040.
14. DGZ/DGZMK (2005) [Direkte Kompositrestaurationen im Seitenzahnbereich-Indikation und Lebensdauer] (Document in German). Available: http://www.dgzmk.de/uploads/tx_szdgzmkdocuments/ Kompositrestaurationen im_Seitenzahnbereich.pdf. Accessed 2012 Sep 29.
15. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R, (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29: 481-508.
16. Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, et al. (2005) Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess 9: 1-134.
17. Ibiyemi O, Bankole OO, Oke GA, (2011) Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years. Afr J Med Med Sci 40: 127-134.
18. Lopez N, Simpser-Rafalin S, Berthold P, (2005) Atraumatic restorative treatment for prevention and treatment of caries in an underserved community. Am J Public Health 95: 1338-1339.
19. van Gemert-Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IH, (2007) Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Investig 11: 337-343.
20. Zanata RL, Fagundes TC, Freitas MC, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, (2011) Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 15: 265-271.
21. Ibiyemi O, Bankole OO, Oke GA, (2011) Assessment of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) on the permanent dentition in a primary care setting in Nigeria. Int Dent J 61: 2-6.
22. Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Mattos MC, Lauris JR, Ericson D, et al. (2008) Comparison of two minimally invasive methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: short-term results of a pilot study. J Appl Oral Sci 16: 155-160.
23. Ercan E, Dülgergil CT, Soyman M, Dalli M, Yildirim I, (2009) A field-trial of two restorative materials used with atraumatic restorative treatment in rural Turkey: 24-month results. J Appl Oral Sci 17: 307-314.
24. Ziraps A, Honkala E, (2002) Clinical trial of a new glass ionomer for an atraumatic restorative treatment technique in class I restorations placed in Latvian school children. Med Princ Pract 11Suppl 1: 44-47.
25. Wang L, Lopes LG, Bresciani E, Lauris JR, Mondelli RF, et al. (2004) Evaluation of Class I ART restorations in Brazilian schoolchildren: three-year results. Spec Care Dentist 24: 28-33.
26. Lo EC, Holmgren CJ, Hu D, van Palenstein Helderman W, (2007) Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35: 387-392.
27. Abid A, Chkir F, Ben Salem K, Argoubi K, Sfar-Gandoura M, (2002) Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass ionomer sealants in Tunisian children: survival after 3 years. East Mediterr Health J 8: 315-323.
28. Cefaly DF, Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Fagundes TC, Lauris JR, et al. (2007) Clinical evaluation of multiple-surface ART restorations: 12 month follow-up. J Dent Child (Chic) 74: 203-208.
29. Sachdeo A, Gray GB, Sulieman MA, Jagger DC, (2004) Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 12: 15-20.
30. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C, (2007) The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc 138: 763-772.
31. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, et al. (2007) Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 138: 775-783.
32. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V, (2003) Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 31: 395-405.
33. Kiremitci A, Bolay S, (2003) A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. J Oral Rehabil 30: 664-667.
34. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, (2012) Failure rate of high-viscosity GIC based ART compared to that of conventional amalgam restorations- evidence from a systematic review update. S Afr Dent J 67: 329-331.
35. Yip KH, Smales RJ, Gao W, Peng D, (2002) The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: An evaluation after 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc 133: 744-751.
36. Frencken JE, Taifour D, van 't Hof MA, (2006) Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years. J Dent Res 85: 622-666.
37. Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen E, (2002) Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities. ASDC J Dent Child 69: 16-26.
38. Jüni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M, (2002) Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 31: 115-123.
39. Moher D, Pham B, Klassen TP, Schulz KF, Berlin JA, et al. (2000) What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? J Clin Epidemiol 53: 964-972.
40. Pocock SJ (1983) Clinical trials: A practical approach. Chichester: Wiley.
41. Wang D, Bakhai A (2006) Clinical Trials- A Practical Guide to Design, Analysis, and Reporting. Remedica: London.
42. Huitema BE (2011) Uncontrolled Clinical Trials. In: The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives: Statistical Methods for Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Single-Case Studies, 2nd Edition; John Willey and Sons Inc, pp. 609.
43. Reed RB, (1967) The rationale of longitudinal studies. J Dent Res 46: 1208.
44. Arabi Y, (2005) Study Designs in healthcare research. Saudi Med J 26: 1175-1179.
45. White A, Ernst E, (2001) The case for uncontrolled clinical trials: A starting point for the evidence base for CAM. Compl Therapies Med 9: 111-115.
46. Türp JC, Schwarzer G, (2003) The effectiveness of therapeutic measures: the post-hoc-ergo-propter-hoc fallacy. (Article in German). Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 113: 36-46.
47. James KE, (1973) Regression toward the mean in uncontrolled clinical studies. Biometrics 29: 121-130.
48. Sutherland SE: Evidence-based dentistry, (2001) Part IV. Research design and levels of evidence. J Can Dent Assoc 67: 375-378.
49. Mickenautsch S, (2012) Research gaps identified during systematic reviews of clinical trials: Glass-ionomer cements. BMC Oral Health 12: 18.
50. Wang X, Nie J, Cai X, Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S (2012) Failure rate of atraumatic restorative treatment using high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement compared to conventional amalgam restorative treatment in primary and permanent teeth: A systematic review of Chinese trials. J Minim Interv Dent 5: 377-415.