Digital tomosynthesis of the thorax: The influence of respiratory motion artifacts on lung nodule detection

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 634-639

  Kim, Sung Mok ^a   Chung, Myung Jin ^a   Lee, Kyung Soo ^a   Kang, Hee ^a   Song, In Young ^a   Lee, Eun Joo ^a   Hwang, Hye Sun ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Adults; Digital radiography; Lung; Motion artifacts; Observer performance

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; X RAY RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULTS; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; LUNG; MOTION ARTIFACT; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ADULTS; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BREATHING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LUNG; LUNG NODULE; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MOTION ARTIFACTS; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY; X RAY FILM;

ADULTS; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; LUNG; MOTION ARTIFACTS; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; ARTIFACTS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; RESPIRATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 84886609932     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0284185113481593     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Geitung JT, Skjaerstad LM, Göthlin JH. Clinical utility of chest roentgenograms. Eur Radiol 1999;9:721-3.
2. Speets AM, van der Graaf Y, Hoes AW, et al. Chest radiography in general practice: indications, diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:574-8.
3. Schueller G, Matzek W, Kalhs P, et al. Pulmonary infections in the late period after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: chest radiography versus computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:489-94.
4. Blanchon T, Bréchot JM, Grener PA, et al. Base line results of the Depiscan study: A French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest x-ray (CXR). Lung Cancer 2007;58:50-8.
5. Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR. Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. Radiology 1999;213:727-34.
6. Hakansson M, Bath M, Borjesson S, et al. Nodule detection in digital chestradiography: effect of system noise. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:97-101.
7. Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR, et al. Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 1999;26:1365-70.
8. Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL. Radiation exposure at chest CT: A statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2003;228:15-21.
9. Renton J, Kincaid S, Ehrlich PF. Should helical CT scanning of the thoracic cavity replace the conventional chest x-ray as a primary assessment tool in pediatric trauma? an efficacy and cost analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:793-7.
10. Payne JT. CT radiation dose and image quality. Radiol Clin North Am 2005;43:953-62.
11. James TD, McAdams HP, Song JW, et al. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIH sponsored trial. Med Phys 2008;35:2554-7.
12. Vikgren J, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, et al. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology 2008;249:1034-41.
13. Johnsson AA, Vikgren J, Svalkvist A, et al. Overview of two years of clinical experience of chest tomosynthesis at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;139:124-9.
14. Kim EY, Chung MJ, Lee HY, et al. Pulmonary mycobacterial disease: diagnostic performance of low-dose digital tomosynthesis as compared with chest radiography. Radiology 2010;257:266-77.
15. Sabol JM. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis. Med Phys 2009;36:5480-7.
16. Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology 2007;245:742-50.
17. Sung YM, Chung MJ, Lee KS, et al. The influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for the detection of interstitial lung markings on both storage phosphor and flat-panel-detector chest radiography. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:275-9.
18. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27:723-731.
19. Obuchowski NA. New methodological tools for multi-reader ROC studies. Radiology 2007;243:10-220.
20. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Lenth RV. Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic methodology: A bootstrap analysis. Acad Radiol 1995;2:626-33.
21. Bath M, Svalkvist A, von Wrangel A, et al. Effective dose to patients from chest examinations with tomosynthesis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;139:153-8.
22. Zachrisson S, Vikgren J, Svalkvist A, et al. Effect of clinical experience of chest tomosynthesis on detection of pulmonary nodules. Acta Radiol 2009;50:884-91.
23. Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA, et al. Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA 2011;306:1865-73.
24. National Cancer Institute. Lung cancer trial results show mortality benefit with low-dose CT: Twenty percent fewer lung cancer deaths seen among those who were screened with low-dose spiral CT than with chest X-ray. November 4, 2010. See http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/newsfromnci/2010/ NLSTresultsRelease.
25. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395-409.
26. Gomi T, Nakajima M, Fujiwara H, et al. Comparison between chest digital tomosynthesis and CT to detect artificial pulmonary nodules for screening: A phantom study. Br J Radiol 2012;85:e622-9.
27. Jung HN, Chung MJ, Koo JH, et al. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest: utility for detection of lung metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Radiol 2012;67:232-8.
28. Petkovska I, Brown MS, Goldin JG, et al. The effect of lung volume on nodule size on CT. Acad Radiol 2007;14:476-85.