Debating Deviance: Responding to those Who Fall from Grace

Rebels in Groups: Dissent, Deviance, Difference and Defiance

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 117-134

  Jetten, Jolanda ^a   Iyer, Aarti ^a   Hornsey, Matthew J ^a   Hutchison, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communicating with deviant; Debating deviance responding to those who fall from grace; Factors, affecting responses to two questions a group member who appears to have committed a transgression; Functionality of deviance for group; Group norms as determinants of what is deviant; Groups, endorsing norms encouraging tolerance of differences (diversity norms); Ingroup members whether behaviour is deviant or not; Morality, strong responses evoked when morality is involved; People's attributions of what motivated individual's transgression; Responding to deviants

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886569256     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444390841.ch7     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bandura, A., Baranelli, C., Caprara, G.V. & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-74.
2. Birchmeier, Z., Joinson, A.N. & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2005). Storming and forming a normative response to a deception revealed online. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 108-21.
3. Durkheim, E. (1958). Les Règles de lamèthode sociologique [The rules of sociological method]. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4. Emler, N.&Reicher, S. (2005). Delinquency: cause or consequence of social exclusion. In D. Abrams, M.A. Hogg & J.M. Marques (eds), The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion (pp. 211-42). New York: Psychology Press.
5. Erikson, K.T. (1966). Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Festinger, L., Schachter, S. & Back, K. (1950). Social Pressures in Informal Groups. New York: Harper.
7. Gollwitzer, M. & Keller, L. (2010). What you did only matters if you are one of us: offenders' group membership moderates the effect of criminal history on punishment severity. Social Psychology, 41, 20-6.
8. Haslam, S.A. & McGarty, C. (2001). A hundred years of certitude? Social psychology, the experimental method and the management of scientific uncertainty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1-21.
9. Hornsey, M.J. (2006). Ingroup critics and their influence on groups. In T. Postmes& J. Jetten (eds), Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity (pp. 74-91). London: Sage.
10. Hornsey, M.J. & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: an identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365-83.
11. Hornsey, M.J. & Jetten, J. (2003). Not being what you claim to be: impostors as sources of group threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 639-57.
12. Hornsey, M.J., Jetten, J., McAuliffe, B. & Hogg, M.A. (2006). The impact of individualist and collectivist group norms on evaluations of dissenting group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 57-68.
13. Hutchison, P. & Abrams, D. (2003). Ingroup identification moderates stereotypes change in reaction to ingroup deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 497-506.
14. Hutchison, P., Jetten, J. & Gutierrez, R. (2010). Deviant but desirable: Perceived Group Variability and Judgements of Atypical Group Members. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Irvin, J. (2006, August 19). G€unter Grass ismyhero, as a writer and a moral compass. The Guardian. Retrieved 21 April 2009 from www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/aug/19/comment.germany.
16. Iyer, A. & Jetten, J. (2009). Unpublished data, University of Queensland, Australia.
17. Iyer, A., Jetten, J. & Haslam, S.A. (2010). Sugaring o'er the Devil: Moral Superiority and Group Identification Help Individuals Downplay the Implications of Ingroup Rule-Breaking. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Jetten, J. & Branscombe, N.R. (2009). Seeking minority group memberships: responses to discrimination when group membership is self-selected. In F. Butera&J. Levine (eds), Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion (pp. 155-76). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N.R., Schmitt, M.T. & Spears, R. (2001). Rebels with a cause: group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204-13.
20. Jetten, J., Hornsey, M.J., Spears, R., Haslam, S.A. & Cowell, E. (2010). Rule transgressions in groups: the conditional nature of newcomers' willingness to confront deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 338-48.
21. Leach, C.W., Ellemers, N. & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-49.
22. Levine, J.M. (1989). Reactions to opinion deviance in small groups. In P.P. Paulus (ed.), Psychology of Group Influence (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Marques, J.,Abrams, D.&Serôdio, R.G. (2001).Being better by being right: subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-77.
24. Marques, J.M. & Paez, D. (1994). The black sheep effect: social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37-68). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Matheson, K., Cole, B. & Majaka, K. (2002). Dissidence from within: examining the effects of intergroup context on group members' reactions to attitudinal opposition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 161-9.
26. Morton, T.A., Postmes, T. & Jetten, J. (2007). Playing the game: strategic considerations and responses to normative and deviant group members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 599-616.
27. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social Influence and Social Change. New York: Academic Press. Packer, D.J. (2008). On being both with us and against us: a normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50-72.
28. Postmes, T. & Jetten, J. (eds) (2006). Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity. London: Sage.
29. Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-30.
30. Santee, R.T. & Maslach, C. (1982). To agree or not to agree. Personal dissent amid social pressure to conform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 690-700.
31. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
32. Turner, J.C. (2006). Tyranny, freedom and social structure: escaping our theoretical prisons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 41-6.