The benefits of single-touch screens in intersubjective meaning making

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 2, Issue , 2013, Pages 10-13

  Davidsen, Jacob ^a   Christiansen, Ellen ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; EMBODIED INTERACTION; MEANING MAKINGS; MULTI-TOUCH TECHNOLOGIES; SCREEN INTERACTION; TASK-ORIENTED; TURN-TAKING; WORK SPACE;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

TOUCH SCREENS;

EID: 84886493344     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Davidsen, J., & Georgsen, M. (2010). ICT as a tool for collaboration in the classroom. Design for Learning, 3(1-2), 54-69.
2. Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1-24.
3. Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, Mass.
4. Harris, A., Rick, J., Bonnett, V., Yuill, N, Fleck, R., Marshall, P., & Rogers, Y. (2009). Around the table: are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions? Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 1, CSCL'09 (pp. 335-344).
5. Heap, J. L. (1990). Applied ethnomethodology: Looking for the local rationality of reading activities. Human Studies, 13(1), 39-72.
6. Higgins, S., Mercier, E., Burd, L., & Joyce-Gibbons, A. (2011). Multi-touch tables and collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology.
7. Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Dalton, N. S., & Rogers, Y. (2008). Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW '08 (pp. 167-176). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
8. Koschmann, T., & LeBaron, C (2002). Learner Articulation as Interactional Achievement: Studying the Conversation of Gesture. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 249-282.
9. Koschmann, T., Stahl, G, & Zemel, A. (2007). The video analyst's manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel's policies for studying practice within design-based research).
10. Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 25-45.
11. Mostmans, L., Vleugels, C, & Bannier, S. (2012). Raise Your Hands or Hands-on? The Role of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in Stimulating Intercreativity in Education. Educational Technology & Society, 2012(15(4)), 104-113.
12. Rick, J., Marshall, P., & Yuill, N. (2011). Beyond one-size-fits-all: How interactive tabletops support collaborative learning. Proceedings of IDC (Vol. 11).
13. Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133-1152.
14. Scott, S. D., and Grant., K. D., & Mandryk, R. L. (2003). System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. Proceedings of the eighth conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 159-178).
15. Stahl, G, Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). CSCL: An Historical Perspective on Computer-supported collaborative learning. (R. K. Sawyer, Ed.). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Streeck, J., Goodwin, C, & LeBaron, C. D. (2011). Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Yuill, N, & Rogers, Y. (2012). Mechanisms for collaboration: A design and evaluation framework for multiuser interfaces. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact, 19(1), 1:1-1:25.